release.7z actuallyCurrently updating, please help me on this step:
8.Copy the contents of the arm9loaderhax zip to a9lh folder on your SD card
so which zip is that?I've downloaded all content of this page https://3ds.guide/updating-a9lh but there's no "arm9loaderhax zip".
Thanks!
Because your themes and games are stored on your SD card, but sdless is a v4(official), v3(unofficial) feature if I remembered correctly. So you should be good.After finishing all of the procedures, the 3ds can get to luma without Microsd inserted, but all my theme and games are gone..but this is normal right?does this mean I'm on v4 now?
Because your themes and games are stored on your SD card, but sdless is a v4(official), v3(unofficial) feature if I remembered correctly. So you should be good.
The only 100% brick protection available is a hardmod. Anything which writes to NAND has the potential to brick. Just make sure you make a valid NAND dump before doing anything NAND related. Then if you do get a brick which isn't software recoverable you can hardmod and restore.
If you check between both, you'll see that the files inside are the same (same hash) except on v4 there's no firm_100.bin(otpless file). That way, latest safe9installer won't try to use it.I just noticed this.The guide says to install version 3 during the process of installing a9lh for the first time but in the update section it has version 4.Why keep version 3 on the first time users install guide if its the unofficial release of sdless? I have version 3 basically because of that.Ill probably have to update too.
So your saying because the guide requires the otp it has to use the version with the otpless file correct? incase someone decides to use it even though the guide doesn't recommend it anymore.So updating to 4 is just removing the otpless file then to prevent unknown bricks.If you check between both, you'll see that the files inside are the same (same hash) except on v4 there's no firm_100.bin(otpless file). That way, latest safe9installer won't try to use it.
Since the guide reverted to OTP version, there's no danger of it with safe9installer v2.0.3
Either that or the guide wasn't fully updated (yet) to only use the v4, :-)So your saying because the guide requires the otp it has to use the version with the otpless file correct? incase someone decides to use it even though the guide doesn't recommend it anymore.So updating to 4 is just removing the otpless file then to prevent unknown bricks.
Someone made a thread that gave some details about versions, but anyways, it's recommended to update to the latest one of A9LH anyways.SInce the thread is here, is there a way to identify my version of A9LH? I did mine right before OTPLess came out.
What does this do for me? Because so far my A9LH functions properly and has no issues. I really don't want to do anything if I don't need to. Telling me it's recommended isn't an applicable answer here. And my console has a capture card form katsukity, so I'd like to minimize un-required chances of brick.Someone made a thread that gave some details about versions, but anyways, it's recommended to update to the latest one of A9LH anyways.
What it does for everyone else: booting without SD, unified screeninit/noscreeninit (call the boot file arm9loaderhax_si.bin/arm9loaderhax.bin), some internal changes especially compared to v1What does this do for me?
Fine, you're not required to upgrade; but I hope you didn't install any official updates to sysnand before you got cfw, because those bring a comparable brick risk (by rewriting the kernel partitions) with little, negative, or zero gainI'd like to minimize un-required chances of brick.
What it does for everyone else: booting without SD, unified screeninit/noscreeninit (call the boot file arm9loaderhax_si.bin/arm9loaderhax.bin), some internal changes especially compared to v1
Fine, you're not required to upgrade; but I hope you didn't install any official updates to sysnand before you got cfw, because those bring a comparable brick risk (by rewriting the kernel partitions) with little, negative, or zero gain
Your explanation on "official updates" is vague, or rather non existent. All firmwares prior to A9LH were just "official updates". So please be more specific before you pop off.