I know, but he is worried it isn't enough features or the features wouldn't be good enough. That's what I don't care about.
Actually it does. Gold is known to use in higher tier eletronics such as pcie on gpu end. Though there is one metal that make some of the strongest acid looks like total joke.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
In comparison lpddr3 for arm is at most 3GB if not less.
The PS Vita has 512 MB + 128 MB (Main/GPU)
The Wii U has 1 GB + 1GB (System/Game)
//Sent from my glorious OnePlus X
I don't know if this is a rumor or not.
But if this is true xbox one has double the amount of ram when compared to switch.
2*4=8gb ram.
Don't compare the switch specification to the wii u. Compare the switch to the latest technology.
Don't compare the switch specification to the wii u. Compare the switch to the latest technology.[/QUOTE]
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/ni...h-will-have-half-the-ram-of-xbox-one-and-ps4/
But if this is true xbox one has double the amount of ram when compared to switch.
2*4=8gb ram.
Don't compare the switch specification to the wii u. Compare the switch to the latest technology.
Don't compare the switch specification to the wii u. Compare the switch to the latest technology.[/QUOTE]
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/ni...h-will-have-half-the-ram-of-xbox-one-and-ps4/
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/ni...h-will-have-half-the-ram-of-xbox-one-and-ps4/[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but why should I compare a handheld (technically) to a high-end home console with higher price?
//Sent from my glorious OnePlus X
Only 4 of it is reserved for the games and most games are only using 2-2.5 of it. The rest is there for future proofing.
The OS is using 2-3 at all times and the last 1 is used for background processing
Yeah, but why should I compare a handheld (technically) to a high-end home console with higher price?
//Sent from my glorious OnePlus X[/QUOTE]
Really a good answer.But your answer cannot be accepted by the game companies for eg. ea sports. They closed the production of fifa for the whole nintendo consoles because of the less specs.
http://www.polygon.com/2015/5/29/86...-on-any-nintendo-platforms-a-first-since-2000
Last edited by Vishnoo,
Pro tip: more RAM doesn't automatically make your system better. Throwing more RAM into a machine that is bottlenecked elsewhere is pretty much just throwing away money to appease the people who care how consoles look on paper rather than their actual capabilities.
Last edited by grossaffe,
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 3,825
- Trophies
- 1
- Location
- The State of Denial
- Website
- gbatemp.net
- XP
- 5,666
- Country
D
Deleted User
Guest
yer still technically doing that by comparing it to the wii u, a wii u is a home console, not a portable console... the closest you can compare it with is the 3ds and the vita
or the nvidia shield tablet, open pandora or etc.
S
Saiyan Lusitano
Guest
SNES, N64 and GameCube were powerful consoles but Nintendo nowadays prefers to release weaker consoles and with little to no third party support. We're yet to see if the NS will actually have that solid third party support.
I remember how the Wii U was supposed to have a solid third party support and it went down the toilet.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 5,484
- Trophies
- 2
- Location
- Sacramento, California
- Website
- lazerlight.x10.mx
- XP
- 5,482
- Country
Something to take into account is that raw processing/capacity isn't everything. Technological advances can help in such situations. For instance, ASTC (invented by ARM) and various other texture compression formats are support by the Tegra line, meant to reduce loading times and memory footprints, not to mention improving performance, battery life, and reduces heat of the device, requiring less bandwidth while consuming less energy. Because the Switch doesn't have to worry about compatibility with other devices (like all these various Android devices and whatnot), optimizations can be made specifically for its own benefit and none other.
I mean, when people heard that the Switch may only support 32GB carts, they had second thoughts because many games on PS4/XB1 certainly extend past that. What doesn't seem to be acknowledged is what is taking up all that space and what can be done about that. We've already looked at textures. Let's look at FMVs now. On PS4/XB1, they support AVC/h264, so videos will be in that format, but what is understood for Tegra X1 and later, they support HEVC/h265, which grants AVC quality at roughly half the bitrate. 30GB of video in a PS4/XB1 game? Effectively becomes about 15GB for Switch.
I mean, when people heard that the Switch may only support 32GB carts, they had second thoughts because many games on PS4/XB1 certainly extend past that. What doesn't seem to be acknowledged is what is taking up all that space and what can be done about that. We've already looked at textures. Let's look at FMVs now. On PS4/XB1, they support AVC/h264, so videos will be in that format, but what is understood for Tegra X1 and later, they support HEVC/h265, which grants AVC quality at roughly half the bitrate. 30GB of video in a PS4/XB1 game? Effectively becomes about 15GB for Switch.
Similar threads
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
RedColoredStars:
There is an actual trailer with footage too. lol. Going to watch it tonight. Grabbed it from... a place. -
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, JonTron's back yet again until he disappears into the void for another 6 or so months.+1 -
-
-
