art-101: you can't use it because it requires PC software to patch the roms and send to microSD cart... and you have an iBook.
Its clean rom compatible...
art-101: you can't use it because it requires PC software to patch the roms and send to microSD cart... and you have an iBook.
art-101: you can't use it because it requires PC software to patch the roms and send to microSD cart... and you have an iBook.
Its clean rom compatible...
Don't care about Costello's words, for an unknown reason, he can't stop telling that the acekard is bullshit and that the DS-X will rule the world ...
Ninjapass X9TF is supported by any device thats compatible with mass storage usb devices (such as OS-X), and its pure drag and drop. It might be better suited to your needs. Also, the file system advantage for AceKard is that games run just like they would in a true DS cart. Even with lower speed media apparently. Or so I've heard anyway.Sorry I didn't know when i posted that the Acekard used it's own filesystem.
Is there some benefit to the Acekard team developing their own FS for it?
Oh well I guess I'll have to wait for Romman to make a slot 1 supercard with no custom filesystem and that uses clean roms so I can just drag and drop from my mac.
Costello, are you guys getting a review unit of the X9TF anytime soon? I'd love to see a review.
Whatever you say, the fact that it requires a PC software to transfer the files makes it just like patching. What difference does it make if the roms are patched or not, as long as you have to pass them through a software?
This PC software is a bad thing for the following reasons:
- it makes the acekard compatible with PC only
- will most probably require updates (I dont know that, but are there special settings to apply when writing a rom? like the M3? that would surely be annoying)
- the transfer speeds might not be as good (tbc?)
The use of AKFS is also a bad thing because:
- it doesn't support file fragmentation (so if you have this scheme [64 MB game][32 MB game][64 MB game], if you delete the 32 MB in the middle, you can't re-use this space for another game unless it's 32 MB. You're got for a re-format.)
- homebrew will not like it
- you can't use drag and drop ( which is by far my favourite feature... )
Anyway, our acekard units should be on the way now.
Its true about the fragmentation stuff I'm pretty sure. There were people talking about it on some forum I came across, so unless you REALLY want certain games on there for a while, I'd say the acekard would be a hassle for people who switch games alot.. And this just occurred to me, but if the AceKard uses a program to move roms to the SD card, then how would you get non-roms (mp3's and such) onto it? And also, why do they need a program for a new file system. Can't they just put it in the form of a windows driver? I've had experience with other files systems like the Roxio Drag to Disc format and such, and all it makes you do, is install system drivers so Windows will recognize and interact with the file system. If they made it a driver, all you'd need would be a formatting program to put the media into AKFS format, and then you could just drag and drop from windows.Whatever you say, the fact that it requires a PC software to transfer the files makes it just like patching. What difference does it make if the roms are patched or not, as long as you have to pass them through a software?
This PC software is a bad thing for the following reasons:
- it makes the acekard compatible with PC only
- will most probably require updates (I dont know that, but are there special settings to apply when writing a rom? like the M3? that would surely be annoying)
- the transfer speeds might not be as good (tbc?)
The use of AKFS is also a bad thing because:
- it doesn't support file fragmentation (so if you have this scheme [64 MB game][32 MB game][64 MB game], if you delete the 32 MB in the middle, you can't re-use this space for another game unless it's 32 MB. You're got for a re-format.)
- homebrew will not like it
- you can't use drag and drop ( which is by far my favourite feature... )
Anyway, our acekard units should be on the way now.
Yeah, these are all legitimate concerns but I have hope (nothing more than that), that they will be mostly unfounded. I don't think that it will require updates or special settings, but I really have no proof of that one way or the other and I won't pretend that I do. Also, are you sure that it doesn't support file fragmentation? That would be a pretty big issue and something that most people will not realize. My own doubts about the Acekard are more about how they are keeping the release in China too much, and their slightly misleading information (many people still don't realize that no patching doesn't mean no PC-side client).
On the other hand, to answer the part of the quote that I bolded, no patching means that it will probably allow Download Play for games to unflashed DSs. That's a big plus in my eyes and probably for many others as well.
Isn't it a bit early to make statements like that? Let's wait for the reviews.Can't they just put it in the form of a windows driver?
That would be of no use to people that don't use a windows machine.
The way I see it currently the AKFS is more trouble than it is worth (and that is before I knew about the fragmentation issue). Neither the DS-X or the X9TF had to resort to a custom FS, so is it really necessary? The AceKard team claims a benefit for running ROMs faster/more efficiently, but we will have to wait for a review to show if it is a significant advantage. If there isn't a large increase in performance, then what was the point?
Just that Acekard is the best Slot-1 card for playing NDS games and nothing else.