YEAA ! I'm going to pay big amount of money to people who act like that. Really logical. They'll always have their puppy dogs that buy their flashcard and tbh , wasn't gateway the bestest because clons clone their features month later ? then all is saidI don't understand how you can be so happy that R4i cloned the Gateway multirom.
This is only going to anger Gateway and will force them to:
1. Add more traps into the code to prevent clones from copying
2. Slow GW down more because instead of adding useful features they will have to add more anti-clone protection
3. Consider stopping putting effort into new features as they will get cloned anyway
You mentioned that the clones should not have too much trouble copying the 7.x/8.x keys from Gateway once Gateway releases the new firmware.
So you're admitting that these clones are putting in no effort and just cloning Gateway.
Have you considered that if Gateway quits because their code and IP is always being stolen then your clone is gonna die off too?
I'm all for competition but if only one side is innovating then when that side stops it brings innovation into a grinding halt.
With that said, you should support the true innovators and get a Gateway instead.
huh did your circuitry break....what the hell is that supposed to say? gateway is the "bestest" because clones cloned it one month laterYEAA ! I'm going to pay big amount of money to people who act like that. Really logical. They'll always have their puppy dogs that buy their flashcard and tbh , wasn't gateway the bestest because clons clone their features month later ? then all is said
I would never consider a gateway given that they purposely included bricking code.
Gateway users also said multirom was impossible and required an FPGA update, yet here we are...
Now they're moaning in yet another rare R4 thread about something else that's impossible, surprise surprise...
How about sticking to Gateway threads since you're just making baseless assumptions about users and clone cards?
Im not dependent on my 3DS for games i can wait a few months for features. Have dozens of backlog games on pc and ps3 so I can wait.
this firmware is made of fail... again. you guys are playing with a ticking time bomb.
Can you explain more about it :o ?
It is not Neimod, is a fake x.x
Gw 2.0b2 had a brick code that was time based, it happened about 2-3 weeks after release (around jan 15th)
r4 which casually grabbed and got the update running without really checking anything besides changing wherever it said gateway to r4 and relased it
Who is to say its not the same thing here?
I think this version is not GW 2.0B2 based, is GW 1.0 with firmware patch changes.
It's based on 2.0, obviously. They've just done a bit of work to the launcher.
Just menu, 2.0 private beta +(With Multi-Rom), have 2mb, this version just have 1.0 mb, i think, it is a 1.0 with changes to *MultiRom*
1.0 couldn't play 4.5 games , this can tho ( except mh4) .
Just menu, 2.0 private beta +(With Multi-Rom), have 2mb, this version just have 1.0 mb, i think, it is a 1.0 with changes to *MultiRom*
I don't think file-size really has anything to do with it.