Gaming Who uses XP still and why?

ichidansan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
266
Trophies
1
Age
31
XP
639
Country
United States
I have Xp on my moms computer, as it's the simplest(shes a bit computer-illiterate), and until a few days ago, it only had half a GB of ram, now it has 2 though.
but the computer works well with Xp and she don't complain as much as she did with her vista machine.
 

djgarf

I Am A Raver
Former Staff
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Messages
2,954
Trophies
2
Age
44
Location
England U.K.
Website
www.gbatemp.net
XP
867
Country
i still use xp cus it does everything i want it to do and i know how to use it properly
got no interest or patience to upgrade to windows 7 and have to learn how to use it the way i like

whenever i have to fix a problem on my girlfriends parents laptop which has windows 7 running on it things always seem to take at least twice as long when compared to fixing a similar problem on a xp system
 

Depravo

KALSARIKÄNNIT
Former Staff
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
5,359
Trophies
2
Location
Purgatory
XP
4,149
Country
United Kingdom

DS1

Tired
Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
1,596
Trophies
1
Location
In the here and now, baby
XP
2,540
Country
United States
My laptop originally came with Vista, which was a serious drain on them computer thingies. *cough* By which I mean to say it ran slow. I switched to XP and it ran fast. It runs fast. I've had no problems whatsoever, and even if Windows 7 doesn't eat up as many resources, I see no reason to upgrade. I do see one reason not to -> I'm cheap as hell!

edit - and yes, I've used Ubuntu before, and it has one fatal flaw that my buddies Densetsu and Phoenix Goddess may be able to relate to - no Microsoft IME pad or even decent JP input. That is seriously like 99% of what I use my computer for, sooo.......
 

Rydian

Resident Furvert™
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
27,880
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
Website
rydian.net
XP
9,111
Country
United States
XP is still the only system that is fully compatible with a ton of awesome old 90s games like Alpha Centauri and Mechwarrior.
I'm actually buying a WXP machine just to play a few of the old games without having to mess around with things in Win7.
DOSBox or VMware. Both are free and segregate you from the security concerns.

i still use xp cus it does everything i want it to do and i know how to use it properly
got no interest or patience to upgrade to windows 7 and have to learn how to use it the way i like
You do know you can disable AERO and set the control panel icon size to the old one and all that jazz, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

djgarf

I Am A Raver
Former Staff
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Messages
2,954
Trophies
2
Age
44
Location
England U.K.
Website
www.gbatemp.net
XP
867
Country
I still use XP. Why? Because my PC is over seven years old and this is the OS that came with it.
xubuntu > xp

http://xubuntu.org/
I don't trust my technological proficiency enough to start reinstalling operating systems on my only PC. When I (eventually) get a laptop I'll use this old beast to practice stuff like that.
if you wana play with linux distros without commiting yourself you could always go the live cd/dvd route
i even got a version of linux on a flash drive for when im very bored at work and wana play solitaire


XP is still the only system that is fully compatible with a ton of awesome old 90s games like Alpha Centauri and Mechwarrior.
I'm actually buying a WXP machine just to play a few of the old games without having to mess around with things in Win7.
DOSBox or VMware. Both are free and segregate you from the security concerns.

i still use xp cus it does everything i want it to do and i know how to use it properly
got no interest or patience to upgrade to windows 7 and have to learn how to use it the way i like
You do know you can disable AERO and set the control panel icon size to the old one and all that jazz, right?

yea i know that, its not just that sorta thing though
i just really like the way i have xp setup and the way i use it and really dont see any need to change it (im a creature of habit i guess)
 

RodrigoDavy

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,453
Trophies
0
XP
879
Country
Brazil
Windows XP = faster, runs old software better, better hardware support for older hardware (16-bit software compatibility)
Windows Vista = Just use Windows 7
Windows 7 = slower, better driver support for recent hardware, runs recent software better, 32-bit and 64-bit versions (16-bit software compatibility in 32-bit version)

Which version of windows do I use? None, I use ubuntu! :D
 

Thesolcity

Wherever the light shines, it casts a shadow.
Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
2,209
Trophies
1
Location
San Miguel
XP
1,138
Country
United States
I still use XP eventhough I have brand new unopened quad core rig with Windows 7 on it, I just can't be bothered to transfer everything over
Besides I hate change -- still use IE8 because I can't be bothered to use Chrome or any other browser

still use IE8 because I can't be bothered to use Chrome

still use IE8


:wtf:

I use 7, I wouldn't touch XP with a 50 foot pole. It scares me, :cry:
 

The Pi

Lurker
Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
1,637
Trophies
1
Location
Scotland
XP
399
Country
I use XP on my netbook (7 works but not well) for windows programs (normally use Arch) and on the school PCs.

Only still use it in either case as I'm forced to.
 

wrsg

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
105
Trophies
1
XP
531
Country
United States
DOSBox or VMware. Both are free and segregate you from the security concerns.
Neither are of much use when you're playing a game that references certain CPU calls etc. from XP. I know because I tried using VMWare recently to play a game that wouldn't work right in 7. It made little difference to the performance, presumably because some things just can't be replicated perfectly in a VM. There's a reason why even today it's still impossible to play stuff like Heavy Gear 2 in VMWare on Windows 7 without gfx artifacts.
 

Centrix

Stop Poking the Moogle!
OP
Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
1,036
Trophies
1
Age
39
Location
Seattle,WA
XP
1,600
Country
United States
Allot of interesting feedback here lol but it would seem again its all preference based? I'd like to see speed and comparability comparisons between XP, Vista, 7 and possibly 8 as I am using Windows 8 9200 at the moment :P
 

RodrigoDavy

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
1,453
Trophies
0
XP
879
Country
Brazil
LMAO Vista?! really...did you say Vista? lol sorry if I'm in hysterics, I know Vista has supposedly seen a ton of improvements but its still crap!
Well with 8 and 7 all you have to do is run it in compatibility mode simple!

I don't think you really know what you're talking about.

Vista is still fine, aside that it needs a somewhat potent computer to run on.
Compatibility mode usually only works if an application has a hard-coded OS-version check, that can't properly detect newer versions of Windows. It doesn't magically make old games with DirectX, driver and kernel issues work with just a flip of a checkbox.

The application doesn't have to be hard-coded, you just right click the application, properties and there's an option there to run in compatibity mode. The only problem is that compatibility mode requires your processor to have Virtualization support that some cheaper or older Celeron/Dual Core processor doesn't have.
 

Rydian

Resident Furvert™
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
27,880
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
Website
rydian.net
XP
9,111
Country
United States
Neither are of much use when you're playing a game that references certain CPU calls etc. from XP.
What does that even mean? CPU instruction sects have no dependency in the OS.

I know because I tried using VMWare recently to play a game that wouldn't work right in 7. It made little difference to the performance, presumably because some things just can't be replicated perfectly in a VM. There's a reason why even today it's still impossible to play stuff like Heavy Gear 2 in VMWare on Windows 7 without gfx artifacts.
Which games? You may have to use a VM with hardware acceleration.

The application doesn't have to be hard-coded, you just right click the application, properties and there's an option there to run in compatibity mode.
He's saying that the OS setting there is to get around programs that don't detect the OS properly.

The only problem is that compatibility mode requires your processor to have Virtualization support that some cheaper or older Celeron/Dual Core processor doesn't have.
You're thinking of XP mode, not compatibility mode.
 

redfalcon

GBATemp Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
250
Trophies
0
Website
code.google.com
XP
206
Country
Gambia, The
The application doesn't have to be hard-coded, you just right click the application, properties and there's an option there to run in compatibity mode. The only problem is that compatibility mode requires your processor to have Virtualization support that some cheaper or older Celeron/Dual Core processor doesn't have.

What? No. Have you even understood what I wrote? The Windows compatibility settings have nothing to do with virtualization. Virtualization is basically an abstraction layer between real hardware and an application, besides XP mode (which can't be used for games since it lacks 3D acceleration) Windows has nothing like that without additional software. IIRC, XP Mode doesn't even require a CPU with Virtualization extensions, so it would be even compatible with
 

raulpica

With your drill, thrust to the sky!
Former Staff
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
11,056
Trophies
0
Location
PowerLevel: 9001
XP
5,716
Country
Italy
I use Windows XP because I have it on my gaming computer. Uses less RAM when I play games.
Every decent gaming PC should use Win7 with a x64 variant installed on it. It's a fairy tale nowadays that games consume less RAM on XP. It's a 100MB difference at max, and it's way negligible in gaming.

DOSBox or VMware. Both are free and segregate you from the security concerns.
Neither are of much use when you're playing a game that references certain CPU calls etc. from XP. I know because I tried using VMWare recently to play a game that wouldn't work right in 7. It made little difference to the performance, presumably because some things just can't be replicated perfectly in a VM. There's a reason why even today it's still impossible to play stuff like Heavy Gear 2 in VMWare on Windows 7 without gfx artifacts.
I play all my incompatible games in VMWare. It works wonders. CPU calls et likes are virtualized perfectly (1:1, do I dare to say?), the only problem relies with old Win95-era games (obviously MS-DOS based) that might directly push things in the Framebuffer and do strange calls on the VGA bios. But I'm sure the VESA driver should handle 90% of it (it uses Bochs' implementation, iirc). That remains only with poor Direct3D implementation. I know for sure that VirtualBox uses Wine's code, but I think VMWare's implementation is proprietary. Needless to say, it's the only one who at least tries to implement D3D7 support.
 

wrsg

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2012
Messages
105
Trophies
1
XP
531
Country
United States
What does that even mean? CPU instruction sects have no dependency in the OS.
Which games? You may have to use a VM with hardware acceleration.
CPU instruction sets don't depend on an OS. I didn't say they did. Some games referenced certain obscure calls to the hardware which were only available on XP.
As for which games... too many to say, most non-mainstream games I played in the 90s wouldn't work without tweaking on 7. And I did try with full hw virtualization. I know what I'm talking about. This is what made me realize the only acceptable solution is an actual XP machine.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye: hoi