Because before the new generations, ALL legendaries have been badass, not cute.Why are they giving us "cute" legendaries? I want badass looking pokemon to be legendary... not that.
Because before the new generations, ALL legendaries have been badass, not cute.Why are they giving us "cute" legendaries? I want badass looking pokemon to be legendary... not that.
Where's the news story that confirms that this isn't real?
Because dear god that pokemon lacks inspiration. it's so bad.
Yes but mew's design was simple and could be liked. These new things they are creating as legendaries are just failure
Even though you're right that pkmn b/w was released earlier than MLP (but just by a month ), people haven't said that Nintendo stole the design or anything, if I read the thread correctly. They just mentioned that Keldeo looks like a MLP-Pony. Which it kinda does.people do realize B/W has released in japan A YEAR before the pony show was released.... I would think people would realize that this has nothing to do with bronies
>back in the day
What about Kyogre????? He was a legendary back in the day too!
No.
bronies have been in existence even before the days of Robot Unicorn Attack, the pony corruption that followed, because they just didn't know it yet.people do realize B/W has released in japan A YEAR before the pony show was released.... I would think people would realize that this has nothing to do with bronies
Yes, because liking horses automatically makes you a brony? NO!bronies have been in existence since the days of Robot Unicorn Attack, they just didn't know it yet.people do realize B/W has released in japan A YEAR before the pony show was released.... I would think people would realize that this has nothing to do with bronies
and that includes people who liked Rapidash and that pony. errr, you know, the pre-evolution. that's first gen, so there have been bronies even then. they just didn't know it yet.