When you read the other posts, they talk about how its untested until someone says it works on the R4SDHC, but I'm guessing you would be able to infer that the ones provided are modified to work with the R4SDHC because I'm assuming you know that originally the woodR4 only works on R4 originals, thus you would also be able to infer that since the link provided on said thread is for WoodR4 version 1.05, one would feel the need to attempt searching if there is a modded version of WoodR4 1.07 by the same person (or any modded version at all) that says it would work for some clone. At this point, I'm hoping you realize the thread of thought behind this in saying that nothing in this line of logic comes close to insisting that the inital release of woodR4 v1.07 would work on a clone.
Taking into account the time and date of the latest posts on the problem with WoodR4 + R4SDHC, you would have been able to deduce that they are all talking about how the project has gotten nowhere and thus many other people have the exact problem you have.
I commend your ability to at least search before asking, though for the logical path stated above, I continue to urge you to hone your skills at searching. If we seem like "pompous, egocentric, narcissistic people" it is mainly due to the fact that we see the same question repeated for ever version of WoodR4 and it does get tiresome without poking a few nubs to keep ourselves amused, though that fact stated, we do try to always give the correct answer regardless of how many times it is asked. So with our "pompous, egocentric, narcissistic" attitude, we will try our best to give you the answer to your question in the most quick, amusing, harsh words possible so that other nubs may find this thread and use these posts as a deterrent for posting the same/similar questions which a logical and refined search can provide the answer for.
As for my cheerleading, its only when there is a really funny phrase and is in no way intended to have a negative effect (sorry if you ended up taking the rest of it the wrong way).
QUOTE said:
Apparently have either a reading problem or seem to assume that when they keep asking over and over for long enough the obvious reality will change by magic.