inb4 the lock!Hadriano said:Alright lets stop arguing now.
Sstew said:Hmm. I was never a fan of the touch screen anyway. If the option was presented I always chose the D-pad.
So when you use your PC you'd rather move the pointer around with the cursors on the num pad instead of using the mouse right ?
Since you are given the option, you might as well ditch that annoying extra gadget on your desk..............
Are you guys trolling me or what ?
If you own a DS you can't dismiss the usefulness and pros of the touch screen ...you might as well be in the wrong forum.......
EDIT
QUOTE(Hadriano @ Mar 23 2010, 01:36 PM) Alright lets stop arguing now.
It's a year awaym3rox said:Just when I was planning on buying the DSi XL...
Jotokun said:Too soon! The DSi hasnt been out yet for even a full year in most territories, hasnt been supported at all(Outside of very poor DSiWare... it has much more powerful internals, where's the utilization of it?), and they have the nerve to screw over the consumers by replacing it?
TM2-Megatron said:Jotokun said:Too soon! The DSi hasnt been out yet for even a full year in most territories, hasnt been supported at all(Outside of very poor DSiWare... it has much more powerful internals, where's the utilization of it?), and they have the nerve to screw over the consumers by replacing it?
This is already been said; but nobody forced you to buy a DSi. The DSi has been out more than 5 years, because it's nothing more than a DS Phat in a prettier shell with a couple cameras built in. The DSi XL has also been out more than 5 years, even though it's not even out yet.
Not too soon. Just in time!!.
Jotokun said:Faster clock rate and 4x as much ram says otherwise. Your right, nobody forced me to buy a DSi, and I admit to only purchasing one because my phat died on me. But think, why would nintendo release a portable, bother to give it better hardware(Again, CPU speed and ram, not the cameras) and then not support it? Will you be saying the same thing when support for the 3DS is dropped next year?
I have nothing against the 3DS. For those with phats and lites, I'm sure it'll be a great handheld. I've just personally had it with Nintendo between this(lack of DSi support, not the 3DS announcement) and their poor software quality of late.
For 3D to work each eye has to be presented with a slightly different image. This is how our eyes work. They are like two cameras with a slight offset capturing the world. The brain the assembles the two images to a final 3 dimensional perception. The major catch here is that only if each eye gets a different image this system works. This requires a filter right in front of each eye so the eye in question receives the appropriate image. Otherwise the effect is not working. This is physics, plain physics. Now if you make a filter on the screen what you can only do is a sort of light bending filter. So you bend the light rays either slightly to the left or right alternating between each other. This way you would sort of redirect rays either to the left or right eye. This would do a sort of filtering but only, as you mentioned, if the eyes are at the exact right location. Being slightly off would destroy the result. It's the only way you can get this physically to work but it's totally impracticable.TM2-Megatron said:Dragonlord said:Stereoscopic rendering is not 3D. When do people eventually learn this. VR is 3D but not SR. Besides SR only works with a few people. And without special glasses SR doesn't work at all since you need filtering. How else are your eyes supposed to know which of the two rendered images it should use? Exactly, there is none. Filtering on the screen is worthless since each of your eyes needs a filter not both eyes together. Your eyes are also not "interlaced". So physically this is nonsense.
Since there are a few companies that've developed displays with some kind of filter on the screen itself, my guess would be that this isn't as "impossible" as you say. Unless you're an engineer with greater skill than all those people who've been working on these problems for so long, now.
There's an article on a display from Sharp here:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/12/3d_illusion/
Apparently your eyes need to be at about the right place to perceive the effect (I guess because the two distint images are reflected by the filter in different directions), but it's some progress.