• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

2nd Amendment in the United States

mrdude

Developer
Developer
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
3,071
Trophies
1
Age
56
XP
8,227
Sometimes I imagine a fictitious world where gunpowder and combustion weapons were never invented, or, some magical or mystical event that removes all projectile weapons from the planet permanently.

I just imagine how that world would be, if NO ONE had a weapon that could kill a person by simply pulling a trigger or pushing a button. A modern world in 2023, where if you wanted to initiate combat, you had to do it hand-to-hand.

There would be far less conflict.
No there wouldn't. You should study some history. We've had spears, knives, swords, axe's, longbows, trebuchet's and all manner of weapons. If you get rid of guns, people will just find another way to kill you. Maybe try reading about the Mongol's, The perisans, The Assyrians, The Ottomans or many of the other empires that have existed long before guns were a thing.

If I was going to be killed - I'd prefer it was quick with a bullet to the head rather than be hacked up with a sword.

Watch this and then you'll change your mind, you'd wish you had a gun to defend yourself.
 
Last edited by mrdude,

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,534
Country
United States
See above Post.
No I fully understand why they felt it was necessary at the time, but a couple caveats would've been immensely helpful nonetheless. Every piece of shit in this country who wants to do harm to it now has a firearm, if not several. Except in the few states with red flag laws, nearly every domestic/child abuser has a firearm, if not several.
 

Smoker1

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Messages
5,045
Trophies
1
Location
California
XP
6,062
Country
United States
No there wouldn't. You should study some history. We've had spears, knives, swords, axe's, longbows, trebuchet's and all manner of weapons. If you get rid of guns, people will just find another way to kill you. Maybe try reading about the Mongol's, The perisans, The Assyrians, The Ottomans or many of the other empires that have existed long before guns were a thing.

If I was going to be killed - I'd prefer it was quick with a bullet to the head rather than be hacked up with a sword.
Or die fighting back, able to Protect and Defend myself, my Family and Home.
Post automatically merged:

No I fully understand why they felt it was necessary at the time, but a couple caveats would've been immensely helpful nonetheless. Every piece of shit in this country who wants to do harm to it now has a firearm, if not several. Except in the few states with red flag laws, nearly every domestic/child abuser has a firearm, if not several.
Look up Carol M. Bowne from New Jersey 2015
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrdude and zfreeman

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,534
Country
United States
Or die fighting back, able to Protect and Defend myself, my Family and Home.
Or you could just die of old age after living a long, happy life. Y'know, like they do in every sane country on Earth.

Look up Carol M. Bowne from New Jersey 2015
I'm not interested in an anecdote, the problems I listed are very real and very widespread. Besides public mass shootings, it's extremely common for men to shoot their families and then themselves. Reaching for your loaded gun being just as easy as scratching your nuts turns into a real problem if you spend most of your day watching rageporn on Faux News or similar.
 
Last edited by Xzi,

_47iscool

Noticer
Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2013
Messages
669
Trophies
1
XP
1,118
Country
United States
Because, at the time after the Revolutionary War, those from England thought they could control us. Wanted us to Pay them Taxes, bend to their Will. Also, wanted us to turn over our Weapons, that they would Protect us, under England's Rule. We wanted to determine our Future. So we fought and won against them. They put the 2nd Amendment in place, so The People could not only Protect and Defend themselves, but also fight against Oppression, and Tyrannical Threats, either Foreign or Domestic. That 1 Freedom, keeps our other Freedoms secure

And just look at the clown running Canada.

Also, check out what Yuri Bezmenov said about American leftists:
Yuri Bezmenov communism.png
 
Last edited by _47iscool,
  • Like
Reactions: mrdude

sombrerosonic

Idiot machine
Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2022
Messages
1,454
Trophies
2
Location
The Tower of pizza
XP
2,893
Country
United States
I can taste the pixels
My opinion is that the 2nd amendment should be eliminated and gun shops closed. Yeah, sure criminals would still be able to get guns ilegally but not the average joe, it only takes a bad day to become a criminal having access to guns. Stress, depression and anxiety can get the better of us so I think not having gun shops would help in reducing shootings (I'm not american so I'm sure most people will disagree with me)
Example of area that has these laws but are hellholes: England (Stabby Stabby)and Mexico (Remember the cartel?)
 

concept8192

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
57
Trophies
0
XP
761
Country
United States
I would like to mention, one reason people seek to stop everyone from having guns is that it's much harder and slower to kill a mass amount of people with a knife than an assault weapon.
Of course there'll always be criminals that want to kill, that's unavoidable. But if you're truly only protecting yourself like I've heard pro-gun people say, you don't need a weapon that could defend you from more than maybe 2 or 3 people, which a knife would protect you from a criminal that (in this theoretical situation) also wasn't allowed to have a firearm
 

lolcatzuru

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2012
Messages
1,458
Trophies
1
XP
2,241
Country
United States
TLDR: Trump is the only president to ever threaten the seizure of firearms without due process. Ammosexuals ruined guns for the rest of us and now we have an average of nearly two mass shootings a day, over twenty mass shootings on Memorial Day weekend alone. Somebody should probably do something about that, and three-fourths of Americans agree we need more comprehensive/universal background checks at the minimum.

i agree, liberals are the biggest problem with this.
 

concept8192

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
57
Trophies
0
XP
761
Country
United States
What about Criminals who get their Weapons Illegally??? Highly doubt this Guy got his Weapons that do not have Serial Numbers from a Gun Shop or a Store.....especially in KOMMIEFORNIA
https://www.kcra.com/article/winter...ads-not-guilty-to-felony-gun-charges/43922606
A lot of criminals do get their weapons completely legally before commiting their crimes too. So making that impossible would help.
That doesn't make much sense in my opinion. At least illegal guns are illegal and can be shut down, letting criminals get guns legally means they can't be charged with it at least.
I'd like this thread to not end with me talking to a brick wall, but I don't have high hopes of that because it seems like you guys have many preconceived biases. (Why did you call it Kommiefornia???)
 

mituzora

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2016
Messages
319
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
1,073
Country
United States
I know it's a cliche, but look at drugs; the ones that are outright illegal are still constantly being consumed despite it being illegal. People who want to harm will always find a way to harm. I remember reading or hearing somewhere (don't ask for source because I don't have it) that places like England which have banned guns still have a massive issue with violent crimes, just instead of using guns, they use stuff like chemicals to torture and burn people to death instead.

Yes, the US has some issues with guns, but outright banning guns isn't going to fix a damn thing with mass shootings.; Instead we need find a way to get people the help they need before they're pushed over the edge to kill someone. the VAST majority of people don't want to hurt each other, and if we can get the help to the people who feel the need to hurt someone, then violent crimes will drop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smoker1

Smoker1

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Messages
5,045
Trophies
1
Location
California
XP
6,062
Country
United States
Exactly. You can get a Vehicle easily, and use it to run down lots of People. What would stop someone from grabbing or getting a large Vehicle, go to a Mall, or School and run over as many as possible before being stopped???? There are those who have run over People, yet no one has demanded a Ban on Vehicles, why is that????
 

zekro94

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
455
Trophies
1
Age
29
XP
1,409
Country
I don't get americans and their love of guns. I see them as unnecessary, as something that regular folks shouldn't have access to, but then people start with whatabotisms like owning a car or other things. It really seems that americans fear their guns being taken away, like having a gun is some sort of "necessary human right"
My question is: How many times have people used their guns in order to defend themselves? in a stresful situation one can grab his gun and just kill an inocent person
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi and concept8192

concept8192

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
57
Trophies
0
XP
761
Country
United States
I don't get americans and their love of guns. I see them as unnecessary, as something that regular folks shouldn't have access to, but then people start with whatabotisms like owning a car or other things. It really seems that americans fear their guns being taken away, like having a gun is some sort of "necessary human right"
My question is: How many times have people used their guns in order to defend themselves? in a stresful situation one can grab his gun and just kill an inocent person
These are my thoughts exactly. Unlike a car, gun has no alternate usage other than maybe hunting (which you still don't need an assault rifle to do)
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: I'll just pretend like I know what's going on