• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Would Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. approve of what his legacy has produced?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 586536

Returned shipping and mailing
Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2022
Messages
1,050
Trophies
1
XP
2,024
Okay groomer.

Your opinion of Kanye holds as much weight.

Says the guy who keeps saying everybody on the right waves nazi and confederate flags. Your opinion holds as much weight.

You should go to other countries so you can witness actual racism, but you won't because it's easier to attack people here or to attack dead people because they can't fight back. You have never done anything in your life to combat racism, so you can just stop pretending to be the white knight here to save all minorities, except for Asians. For some reason, the left really hates Asians.
You know, I could take you to court over calling me a groomer, just saying. That's not a term that is lightly thrown around.
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Boywife
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
27,904
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,162
Country
Antarctica
If you want to fry a lefties brain, tell them that you're Trans-Racial, and some days you identify as another race - therefore you can't be racist, EVER! because you can claim you identified as black on the day that they percieved you to be a racist. Then call them a transracial biggot and watch their heads explode when you are using their own logic against them.
Yeah, no one is going to have their heads fried because of this. You are presenting a fictional argument and strawman.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,526
Country
United States
All cops are racist and black people are unable to be racist cannot exist at the same time. You gotta pick one. Choose wisely.
Both articles you posted were opinion articles, and I definitely do not share the opinion of the latter that black people cannot be racist. Again, both racism and classism are institutionalized within police departments.

To quote NWA's Fuck The Police,

"But don't let it be a black and a white one
'Cause they'll slam ya down to the street top
Black police showing out for the white cop"
 

jordash25

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
56
Trophies
0
Age
42
XP
970
Country
United States

“Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.”​


― Martin Luther King Jr
 
  • Like
Reactions: TraderPatTX

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,736
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,526
Country
United States

“Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.”​


― Martin Luther King Jr
Yeah...that's not really applicable to violent sociopaths in positions of power. Showing them love isn't gonna correct their negative behaviors, it can only demonstrate that you approve of them. Case in point: officers' spouses try to show them love, and all the majority of them get in return is domestic violence or adultery. Police departments are in desperate need of reform, demilitarization, de-escalation training, and mandatory mental health counseling. Love doesn't even make the top one hundred on the list.
 

tabzer

This place is a meme.
Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
5,844
Trophies
1
Age
39
XP
4,910
Country
Japan
Bruh. Kayne West anyone?
Or is it racist to say that him being racist is bad?
At this point your pretty much projecting. Since I'm pretty sure when Kayne West (rightfully) got shat on for his positions. Ya'll called it racist.
I think you listen to OANN or fox news far too much.
Kanye is a better racist than you.
 

jordash25

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
56
Trophies
0
Age
42
XP
970
Country
United States
Yeah...that's not really applicable to violent sociopaths in positions of power. Showing them love isn't gonna correct their negative behaviors, it can only demonstrate that you approve of them. Case in point: officers' spouses try to show them love, and all the majority of them get in return is domestic violence or adultery. Police departments are in desperate need of reform, demilitarization, de-escalation training, and mandatory mental health counseling. Love doesn't even make the top one hundred on the list.
Matthew 24:12
And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
 

TraderPatTX

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2022
Messages
1,785
Trophies
1
Age
47
Location
Florida
XP
1,779
Country
United States
You know, I could take you to court over calling me a groomer, just saying. That's not a term that is lightly thrown around.
Cool, I'll make sure and mention all the times you've called me a nazi and white supremacist. It'll be a fun day of sharing.
Post automatically merged:

Both articles you posted were opinion articles, and I definitely do not share the opinion of the latter that black people cannot be racist. Again, both racism and classism are institutionalized within police departments.
No shit they were opinion articles. And all the times you say the right are fascist white supremacists is pure opinion too.
To quote NWA's Fuck The Police,

"But don't let it be a black and a white one
'Cause they'll slam ya down to the street top
Black police showing out for the white cop"
Love me some NWA, especially Ice Cube.
Post automatically merged:

If he continues to make that statement then I will try.
Is this you?

Should I forget all the times you called me a Nazi, white supremacist, racist, transphobe and whatever stupid name the left comes up with to stifle honest debate? GTFO here with that.
Considering that you continue to spout rhetoric that is bare minimum adjacent to nazi's, at worst, outright nazi, and considering that I have seen you in fact spout transphobic shit. It's warranted.

Thing is, I don't throw those terms willy-nilly. They have a defined clear cut meaning to them. And I use them when they truly apply.

Yeah, that's definitely you alright.
 
Last edited by TraderPatTX,
  • Like
Reactions: CraddaPoosta

Deleted member 586536

Returned shipping and mailing
Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2022
Messages
1,050
Trophies
1
XP
2,024
Yeah, that's definitely you alright.
Alright, let's take a very quick glimpse at why.
Nobody on the right supports sending billions to literal nazis in Ukraine.
Here is your position on Ukraine, which Ukraine is not controlled or majority Nazis. Meanwhile Putin is openly authoritarian, and easily imperialist for invading another country, arguably Nazi adjacent.
Just remember that Republicans are not far right by and large
You trying to downplay how far right the party has gone, considering affiliation with literal Nazi Nick Fuentes, and using rhetoric he is steering.

When asked what kind of government did they form, Benjamin Franklin answered, "A republic, if we can keep it."

"Democracy is the most vile form of government."
- James Madison
You showing that you lack understanding that the United States is a republic and democracy.

Here in this statement:
You think representatives doing what the people voted for them to do is being just like the Taliban. Nobody should take anything you say seriously.
In which you defended banning abortion. In which i made this statement:

Reminder that those representatives are not representative of people due to gerrymandering. In which the Republican party, who wanted this decision for decades, finally got it through undemocratic means. Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. Won the electoral collage. As a result, and a result of the senate playing favorites. Trump packed the court with 3 conservative justices. I already had one person say their politics don't matter. But it does since Republicans tend to game the system even harder. And refusing to fix the undemocratic back doors such as gerrymandering.
Your response was a deflection. As you didn't talk about gerrymandering in your response. and instead changed the conversation to a entirely different discussion
There is a difference between packing the court, which is adding additional seats, and filling open seats...

Then we have:
You should read the Constitution. It states that that state legislatures have complete domain over elections.
This is the immediate moment that solidified my thoughts about you. You were responding to this post from xzi:
Next up they're gonna rule that state legislatures can override the will of the people in elections. Hot on the heels of Thomas stating he believes COVID-19 vaccines are made from aborted fetuses. I knew it was only a matter of time until dipshits brought fascism to this country, I just didn't think it would be dropped on our heads all at once.

Every time someone would take issue with fascists, you cried, and then in this specific case, you proceeded to push independent legislature theory.


Independent legislature theory was pushed and echoed from none other than the same person, Nick Fuentees.
No one up to this point had called you fascist directly.
And when one of the extremely problematic implications of it it was brought up by xzi, which was:

How fucking dense are you? If state legislatures draw their own maps, the party already in power will never lose another election again. They have data sets for voters down to the individual, let alone the communities they choose to include or omit in their maps.
Your response?
So your answer is to just trash the Constitution because it is inconvenient for you. That's the left's only answer to every "problem".
Which was to once again deflect. Ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people who study law and or the constitution, know it as fringe, relying on some very strange interpretations, and then attacking.
Every time, you defend undemocratic actions, and your rhetoric is adjacent to nazi groups.
The wall wasn't finished and there are a flood of illegal aliens being trafficked across the border
You constantly talk about "illegal aliens" and which i called you out on it.
Every time someone calls you out on your bullshit, you deflect and deflect and deflect.

You support Putin's attempt to invade Ukraine
You support gerrymandering
You support independent legislature theory.
Your rhetoric is often either based, or adjacent to nick fuentees. Regarding "illegals" which is a dog whistle for Mexicans.
And in which when i brought up Trump sitting with him. Your response was the same as Trump's response "I didn't know him"
Which the same response Trump has made with MANY MANY PEOPLE who he has connections to.
You believe in several conspiracy theories that are extremely harmful. In which those same conspiracies are, surprise, shared by other Nazi groups.
You support banning abortion, using the same rhetoric of "states rights"
And you constantly have tried to play down January 6th.

I will repeat my damn statement, at best, your rhetoric is adjacent to nazi's and other authoritarians, at worst, outright in support of them.
You constantly end up putting yourself in positions of defending these people, that's why I said what I said.

My accusation towards you is based on rhetoric you have said, and I can verifiable link over 100 times over, from either directly from a nazi (nick) or from the gripevine from some who are closely aligned. Since they said very similar wording, or sometimes even one to one. So I know where your getting your talking points from.


Your accusation towards me, is entirely baseless, and you have to spin things round and round to attempt to make it sound like it's not. You have to make logical leap after logical leap.
 

JackTheHorse

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 31, 2022
Messages
29
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
31
Country
Austria
You know, I could take you to court over calling me a groomer, just saying. That's not a term that is lightly thrown around.
Why were the rest of the posts removed by @DinohScene but not this one? How is telling OP to do it against the rules?

@Nothereed sent empty threats and got called out for it. He kept saying he would have done it, but didn't. This is how much his opinion matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CraddaPoosta

TraderPatTX

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2022
Messages
1,785
Trophies
1
Age
47
Location
Florida
XP
1,779
Country
United States
Alright, let's take a very quick glimpse at why.

Here is your position on Ukraine, which Ukraine is not controlled or majority Nazis. Meanwhile Putin is openly authoritarian, and easily imperialist for invading another country, arguably Nazi adjacent.

You trying to downplay how far right the party has gone, considering affiliation with literal Nazi Nick Fuentes, and using rhetoric he is steering.


You showing that you lack understanding that the United States is a republic and democracy.

Here in this statement:

In which you defended banning abortion. In which i made this statement:


Your response was a deflection. As you didn't talk about gerrymandering in your response. and instead changed the conversation to a entirely different discussion


Then we have:

This is the immediate moment that solidified my thoughts about you. You were responding to this post from xzi:


Every time someone would take issue with fascists, you cried, and then in this specific case, you proceeded to push independent legislature theory.


Independent legislature theory was pushed and echoed from none other than the same person, Nick Fuentees.
No one up to this point had called you fascist directly.
And when one of the extremely problematic implications of it it was brought up by xzi, which was:


Your response?

Which was to once again deflect. Ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people who study law and or the constitution, know it as fringe, relying on some very strange interpretations, and then attacking.
Every time, you defend undemocratic actions, and your rhetoric is adjacent to nazi groups.

You constantly talk about "illegal aliens" and which i called you out on it.
Every time someone calls you out on your bullshit, you deflect and deflect and deflect.

You support Putin's attempt to invade Ukraine
You support gerrymandering
You support independent legislature theory.
Your rhetoric is often either based, or adjacent to nick fuentees. Regarding "illegals" which is a dog whistle for Mexicans.
And in which when i brought up Trump sitting with him. Your response was the same as Trump's response "I didn't know him"
Which the same response Trump has made with MANY MANY PEOPLE who he has connections to.
You believe in several conspiracy theories that are extremely harmful. In which those same conspiracies are, surprise, shared by other Nazi groups.
You support banning abortion, using the same rhetoric of "states rights"
And you constantly have tried to play down January 6th.

I will repeat my damn statement, at best, your rhetoric is adjacent to nazi's and other authoritarians, at worst, outright in support of them.
You constantly end up putting yourself in positions of defending these people, that's why I said what I said.

My accusation towards you is based on rhetoric you have said, and I can verifiable link over 100 times over, from either directly from a nazi (nick) or from the gripevine from some who are closely aligned. Since they said very similar wording, or sometimes even one to one. So I know where your getting your talking points from.


Your accusation towards me, is entirely baseless, and you have to spin things round and round to attempt to make it sound like it's not. You have to make logical leap after logical leap.
So, I didn't waste my time reading all of this, but I can guarantee you said that it's ok that you call me a nazi and white supremacist because I'm a big doodie head and I deserve it, but you talking about sexualizing kids does not warrant people calling you a groomer.

And you're going to accuse me of believing a bunch of shit which I have never said I agree with or believe in, but you are going to continually lie about me anyway, but I can't mention that you continually talk about sexualizing children and mutilating their bodies, even though you have explicitly expressed support for giving kids drugs and cutting up their bodies.

All you have is lies and slander. You never back anything up you say about other people with facts. You make up words that they never say and say that's what they believe.

In a nutshell, you are a big doodie head and I'm gonna call you a big doodie head every time you lie about me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYzI76fwaM0