So, for the encounter code to work, would the picnic reset method used for shiny hunting work? And if not, is there a good place to do this part efficiently?
- Thread starter OblivionReign
- Start date
- Views 2,413,631
- Replies 9,959
- Likes 176
Yes and there are even codes to have scarlet spawns in violet and vice versa so you could catch them like you were playing the opposite version.
Ok so i tried this on my OFW console for infinite ability patches and it WORKS lol
you just leave the miraidon or koraidon in the bottom of your party and the dupe glitch will stay active as long as its there! i saved , turned off the game and came back then clicked "return to ride form" to start the dupe circle all over again so this is not a code its a glitch but its amazing! So you need to know it exists! Enjoy!
WANT TO REMOVE THE RIDE MON YOU STUCK IN YOUR PARTY AFTER YOUR DONE?
simply re-preform the part where you clone it and "send to box" then release the one you sent to box to remove it from the party.
you just leave the miraidon or koraidon in the bottom of your party and the dupe glitch will stay active as long as its there! i saved , turned off the game and came back then clicked "return to ride form" to start the dupe circle all over again so this is not a code its a glitch but its amazing! So you need to know it exists! Enjoy!
WANT TO REMOVE THE RIDE MON YOU STUCK IN YOUR PARTY AFTER YOUR DONE?
simply re-preform the part where you clone it and "send to box" then release the one you sent to box to remove it from the party.
Last edited by phil3254,
sad as it is ive seen keyloggers in official software so many times i see your point here, they could but likely wont log any number of things to easily id and ban wave us for "abnormal behavior patterns" like say they like shiny encounters and note all your encounters are shiny they could certainly use this as a premise for banning some devs are very over zealous with that stuff, but as you point out its not too likely with pokemon as far as the way they have handled it in the past and even in more recent times when asked about it gamefreaks has expressed they would rather go after hackers (aka the person using the shiny code) than those who say recieved hacked shiny pokemon in trade. I believe blaines the poketuber who lives in Japan had mentioned something about that on his channel in regards to him asking about their policy on they gray areas of "hacked pokemon trades". I do think about all the times we found loggers in playstation games being used against players I suppose its just Ninty catching up bro! lulz!
time will tell! in diamond and pearl remakes i believe they found ways to id clones and ban for them as well in recent years.
It's not about logging. There are certain patterns to how pokemon are generated, and in some cases where the patterns are simpler — such as with ScVi's raid pokemon — you can analyze the pattern to see if the pokemon has been tampered with.
It's similar to how the weak RNG and simpler generation rules from generations 3 and 4 enabled PKHex to tell for sure if a pokemon was tampered with. The ability to tell for sure if a pokemon was tampered with wasn't intentional — thus, Nintendo never used it themselves — but simply a result of how the game works.
Whenever this is the case you simply can't edit a pokemon and hope it won't be detected as illegal. You need a more involved process that guarantees every last bit of data in the pokemon conforms to how the original, non-hacked game generates it.
Damn has no one made an EXP reducer cheat yet? That's crazy I wonder if it's even possible if it's been this long
They never changed it, the only new thing since gen 3 they added was more stuff to it.
Since gen7 they added the RareTryCount and a way to mod IV's, for example chaining, by chaining they added a way to mod IV's by editing the existing value like pkhex does, this allowed non-matching iv / seed combos and legal checking became more complex.
This is also the reason why gamefreak doesn't really care about very strict legal checking, it's too complex to maintain and there are many exceptions to the rule, so they only do rudimentery checks in the game/online to identify 100% illegal mons.
An example of this is my Encounter Mod Code for Scarlet/Violet, prior to 1.0.1 i made a different code that only modded the monsno instead of modding the generator code, this flagged all charmander and mew's to illegal and you were unable to catch them, but the newer code generates valid pokemon that go past the ingame checks.
EXP Share is build into "script/lua/bin/release/dll_danbattle/dll_danbattle.blua" have fun figuring out how to mod it, it's not possible with cheat codes.
Same goes to breeding, it's build into "script/lua/bin/release/dll_picnic/dll_picnic.blua".
These are binary lua 5.4 files, you need unluac.exe and a lot of patience...
here an example of what you have to deal with:
Code:
function L0_1(A0_2, A1_2)
local L2_2, L3_2, L4_2, L5_2, L6_2, L7_2, L8_2, L9_2
if nil == A1_2 then
return
end
L2_2 = getmetatable
L3_2 = A1_2
L2_2 = L2_2(L3_2)
if nil ~= L2_2 then
L3_2 = L0_1
L4_2 = A0_2
L5_2 = L2_2.__index
L3_2(L4_2, L5_2)
end
L3_2 = pairs
L4_2 = A1_2
L3_2, L4_2, L5_2, L6_2 = L3_2(L4_2)
for L7_2, L8_2 in L3_2, L4_2, L5_2, L6_2 do
A0_2[L7_2] = L8_2
end
end
Similar threads
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Veho, Sounds and smells like bullshit. They don't give you cancer, and California should know that. I don't get why they stick labels that say "may or may not cause reproductive harm or cancer". -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
Mame should be two sets one for preservation of everything and one set for people who just want to play and enjoy the old old ganes -
-
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, Believe Japan was going to make it legal at some point, according to a Kotaku story.+1
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I swear like 99% of arcade games wouldn't even exist these days outside of MAME the arcade machines are old and busted very few ever saw any sort of home conversion
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, There's a lot of obscure Japanese arcade titles that are either lost to time or dumped.+1
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I mean if a company could use AI to do the work of a home conversion for essentially free why not? The rights for some games are completely lost though
-
-
-
-
-
-
