-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Making modern weapons to be legal everywhere
- Thread starter Luke94
- Start date
- Views 3,158
- Replies 66
- Likes 1
Well I tried wearing ancient,medieval helmet myself with welding sword. Metallic sword without being made out of plasma laser swords/light sabers. Are they would they in reality be real? That one from Star Wars,Doom,original Deus Ex. Are they made out of sun energy?
Last edited by Luke94,
You do know that the World's biggest Arms Suppliers are: The US, The UK, Russia, France and China, right?????? Oh, and that is just the "Legal" types. The Illegal types are Classified like crazy, or they will naturally Deny it like crazy, to protect their Image to The People
All I am here to say is it is going to get really fun when 3d printers* and cheap CNC machines become able to manufacture things from steels you would want to use here (even more crazy in the US when it is the receiver** that is the item they care about rather than pressure bearing components like most of the rest of the world, though even then there are shortcuts). Gunpowder is trivial to make as well.
*laser sintering of metals is a fairly high end industrial process but so was laser sintering of plastics and you can just about squeak in under 10000 USD these days.
**a favourite series in this (youtube version is censored because youtube so we have to go somewhere else)
*laser sintering of metals is a fairly high end industrial process but so was laser sintering of plastics and you can just about squeak in under 10000 USD these days.
**a favourite series in this (youtube version is censored because youtube so we have to go somewhere else)
Automatic weapons are not used in mass shootings. I didn't read more since you couldn't even get that basic fact correct. I figured the rest was more of the same disinformation.
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2013
- Messages
- 17,736
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- The Lands Between
- Website
- gbatemp.net
- XP
- 8,534
- Country
That's not how things work, a knife isn't ever gonna have the same potential to kill or maim as many people as a thirty round magazine in any semi-auto firearm. Besides, the US is near the top of the list when it comes to the frequency of knife attacks as well, so clearly easy access to both only compounds problems further.
If you banned knives people would just stab each other with something else, or start using hammers or axes or something else. Acid attacks and Machete attacks are pretty common in UK. Personally I'd like to see guns being legal - it would even the odds quite a bit if you were about to be hacked up by a drug gang.
Tell that to our Idiot "Leaders" here in the US. We have 1 idiot in New Jersey, saying the 2nd Amendment is meant for the Rich........basically saying the People dont have Rights, only the Rich.
This statement could be applied to any country. What if Mexico decided overnight that the US is theirs? Or if the US called dibs on Canada? Shouldn't they be able to be armed as well?
What is considered a modern weapon? Semi-automatic weapons have been around since the 1700's. If you are talking about fully automatic weapons, those are prohibitively expensive and requires much more thorough background checks and costs. If you are talking about things such as nukes and missiles, then that is just silly argument.
What people do not realize is that in the 1700's, the American Navy relied on war ships owned by private individuals. It was also legal to purchase cannons. When the left makes the argument that the 2nd Amendment does not cover modern weapons, remember that the weapons from that time period are difficult to own today, unless they are disabled.
It is my hope that the left admit that their real argument is the disarmament of the entire citizenry so the government can own all the weapons just like what happened in Cuba, China, the Soviet Union, and Nazi Germany. This is one thing the communists and the fascists completely agree because it always works out in their favor.
Gun control laws are racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic.
What people do not realize is that in the 1700's, the American Navy relied on war ships owned by private individuals. It was also legal to purchase cannons. When the left makes the argument that the 2nd Amendment does not cover modern weapons, remember that the weapons from that time period are difficult to own today, unless they are disabled.
It is my hope that the left admit that their real argument is the disarmament of the entire citizenry so the government can own all the weapons just like what happened in Cuba, China, the Soviet Union, and Nazi Germany. This is one thing the communists and the fascists completely agree because it always works out in their favor.
Gun control laws are racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 1,560
- Trophies
- 2
- Location
- Emerald Coast
- Website
- web.archive.org
- XP
- 6,203
- Country
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China
Compare the death toll with the US. It's easier to stop a kid with a knife or a hammer than a kid with an AR15.
So yeah, no modern weapons everywhere. I'll leave that craze to the US, thank you very much.
I don't know if China owns all weapons inside it's borders, but I do know that China owns the US debt, because instead of developing their country, US is spending money, time and energy with weapons and weapon politics.
If you'd like to live under an authoritarian government who employs slave labor and concentration camps, then go ahead and move there. Just know they are still locking down their citizens over "Covid fears" because the citizens there cannot fight back. If guns were legal in China, Tiananmen Square may have had a different result.
Not to mention the U.S. is like... roughly 47 times the size of the puny U.K. size-wize, and populous-wise.
With the Cartel, I wouldn't blame Mexican citizens for wanting weapons.
its weird that you never considered the fact, there are some shitty people out there, wasnt your guy like the king of bad people?
Post automatically merged:
ironically, their government ( much like ours) is bribed by the cartel so they arent allowed to have them.
Yeah, you tell those farmers, ranchers, and other people in the country, that lives hours away from the police, that they can take down a bear, wolf or any other wild life with rubber bullets or a taser. I'm sure hunters will love going hunting with a taser or rubber bullets. I'm sure the fisherman in Alaska will love to be armed with a knife and a taser, when being confronted by a Polar Bear.
Similar threads
