• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Swedish scientist suggests eating "long pig" to fight climate change

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
Now that is what I call a coincidence. It's coming, folks. The impossible burger is people!!! It's PEOPLE!!!!

For the conspiracy people in here, here's one for you....
In the US, the Democrat forerunners running for president want us to become a Socialist nation to the likes of Venezuela where they have resorted to eating zoo animals and pets. They do not consider unborn babies as humans until they pass the birth canal as we now have abortion laws stating that they can be performed up till the moment of birth.
Planned Parenthood has been known to advocate for abortion over other options like adoption and try to convince mothers that killing their baby is the better option.
Now, we have here a left thinking swedish scientist advocating for cannibalism.

Hmmm, are the democrats getting our future food source prepared and ready in case their socialist ideas don't work out? They'll say, "We aren'tt be eating people. We're eating "9-month underdeveloped fetuses" roasted slow with some fava beans and a nice chianti."

Just something to ponder over.
You mean Social democracy.
When are Americans finally learn the difference between a social democracy (NOT BEING SOCIALIST) and a socialist country ? Americans always talk about the Nordic countries and countries in Western Europe and say socialism wich is ugh. Almost every country in Europe is a social democracy and not a socialist country like Americans always claim. Learn the fucking difference please cause i keep seeing people throwing the word socialist around and even by scholars doing speeches at universities not even knowing the difference between socialism or a social democracy wich is NOT THE SAME. See the picture below so that you may finally be educated and stop calling everything that isn't pure capitalism socialism.
Social Democracy_edited.jpg
 
Last edited by kumikochan,
  • Like
Reactions: Julie_Pilgrim

Godofcheese

Insane
Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
395
Trophies
0
Location
Shivering Isles
XP
2,466
Country
Sweden
You mean Social democracy.
When are Americans finally learn the difference between a social democracy (NOT BEING SOCIALIST) and a socialist country ? Americans always talk about the Nordic countries and countries in Western Europe and say socialism wich is ugh. Almost every country in Europe is a social democracy and not a socialist country like Americans always claim. Learn the fucking difference please cause i keep seeing people throwing the word socialist around and even by scholars doing speeches at universities not even knowing the difference between socialism or a social democracy wich is NOT THE SAME. See the picture below so that you may finally be educated and stop calling everything that isn't pure capitalism socialism.
View attachment 178728

I'm going to eat you first :)
 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
how you guys eat D?
Well it's an apple or pear syrup product you don't have that people often spread over meat. People from Germany, France, Netherlands and Belgium do it. It's actually a sort of syrup that originated from a city 15km from my place. It's often used on top of meat as a glacing. The original beef stew recipe actually comes from Belgium and it has to be made with this syrup and brown beer.
 

Attachments

  • Schermafbeelding-2016-01-13-om-06.41.26.png
    Schermafbeelding-2016-01-13-om-06.41.26.png
    29.5 KB · Views: 263
  • runderstoofvlees-bier-appelstroop0006-694x400.jpg
    runderstoofvlees-bier-appelstroop0006-694x400.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 249
Last edited by kumikochan,
  • Like
Reactions: Julie_Pilgrim

morvoran

President-Elect
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
1,032
Trophies
0
Location
MAGA Country
XP
2,358
Country
United States
You mean Social democracy.
When are Americans finally learn the difference between a social democracy (NOT BEING SOCIALIST) and a socialist country ?
No, I mean Socialist. Democrats say Democratic socialism but are for the full control over businesses and society on top of socialism, so socialism. They think capitalism is evil and force people into poverty when it's the opposite. If they ever come into power over the US, we will become a Cannibalistic socialist country.
 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
No, I mean Socialist. Democrats say Democratic socialism but are for the full control over businesses and society on top of socialism, so socialism. They think capitalism is evil and force people into poverty when it's the opposite. If they ever come into power over the US, we will become a Cannibalistic socialist country.
No, i actually followed what they said and it's 100 percent a social democracy and not socialist. Socialist would mean all companies in the US and banks and wall street and so forth being purely under the control of the State wich is not what they said and want and even claimed. I really don't get where you're getting that information that they claim socialism and not social democracy. I actually follow a lot what politicians say and claim in the US and everything hints toward social democracy wich again is not socialist. In a social democracy you have laws that protect citizens and consumers from the overly rich, corruption and so forth but all businesses are still private and not under goverment control. How is that socialist ? The democrats are proposing to go towards a system western European countries have wich is a social democracy and again not socialist like everybody keeps throwing around that word. I'm guessing people do it so they can induce fear like it's something bad and lying about what it is claiming it is socialism wich again is not. It is a social democracy based on evolution and not revolution mixing socialist ideas in a capitalist society where business is still privatized and not under goverment control while socialism is a society based on revolution and not evolution not having any form of democracy and all being under the control of the state nothing being privatized. It's not comparable whatsoever.
 
Last edited by kumikochan,
  • Like
Reactions: Julie_Pilgrim

wartutor

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
759
Trophies
1
Age
45
XP
2,386
Country
United States
Well, I being from Europe that would be a good choice seeing that i have less chemical products running through my veins :P

But those products are the good parts. I will be second hand chemically grown . Btw i stumbled on this and had to read the whole damn thing. Loved the futurama references lmao. But the whole time reading this i had the song from swenny todd screaming in my head. "Try the priest" and "but fortunatly, its also clear...that ev'rybody goes down well with beer"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reynardine

morvoran

President-Elect
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
1,032
Trophies
0
Location
MAGA Country
XP
2,358
Country
United States
No, i actually followed what they said and it's 100 percent a social democracy and not socialist. Socialist would mean all companies in the US and banks and wall street and so forth being purely under the control of the State wich is not what they said and want and even claimed. I really don't get where you're getting that information that they claim socialism and not social democracy. I actually follow a lot what politicians say and claim in the US and everything hints toward social democracy wich again is not socialist. In a social democracy you have laws that protect citizens and consumers from the overly rich, corruption and so forth but all businesses are still private and not under goverment control. How is that socialist ? The democrats are proposing to go towards a system western European countries have wich is a social democracy and again not socialist like everybody keeps throwing around that word. I'm guessing people do it so they can induce fear like it's something bad and lying about what it is claiming it is socialism wich again is not. It is a social democracy based on evolution and not revolution mixing socialist ideas in a capitalist society where business is still privatized and not under goverment control while socialism is a society based on revolution and not evolution not having any form of democracy and all being under the control of the state nothing being privatized. It's not comparable whatsoever.
Yeah, and what part of this one-sided nonsense has to do with cannibalism or the story. Try to stay on topic.
As for the point you don't get, the Dems are against capitalism, so what are they for? Hmmm, socialism? There is a fine line between Democratic socialism and outright socialism. So fine that they are practically the same. Norwegian countries are considered socialist by the left, but are more compassionate capitalism countries. I would go further but this has nothing do do with the topic. Take it to another thread, please.
 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
Yeah, and what part of this one-sided nonsense has to do with cannibalism or the story. Try to stay on topic.
As for the point you don't get, the Dems are against capitalism, so what are they for? Hmmm, socialism? There is a fine line between Democratic socialism and outright socialism. So fine that they are practically the same. Norwegian countries are considered socialist by the left, but are more compassionate capitalism countries. I would go further but this has nothing do do with the topic. Take it to another thread, please.
I wasn't, i just quoted a comment on this topic about that and no they're not. Again look up what is a social democracy. There's no thin line. It has worked liked that for the Union almost a 100 years now without ever crossing that line. How can it be a thin line if European countries are the ones that started the social democracy and never even crossed that line ? I would say it is a thin line if the line was actually crossed multiple times but it never was so where are you getting that information that it actually is a thin line ? Assertion is a thin line between submission and agression since that line has often been crossed by people who were naturally assertive hence the term thin line since it has been crossed multiple times. How can something be a thin line if it NEVER has been crossed in a really LARGE timespan for politics with new leaders every 4 years ??? But yeah you're right, this has not a lot to do with the topic at hand so this will be my last comment regarding that topic on here. Back to the topic at hand
 
Last edited by kumikochan,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: @ZeroT21, not yet