Homebrew Question Are there any text editor homebrews besides vgedit?

Deleted member 487613

Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
13
Trophies
0
XP
409
Currently the only text editor I can find is vgedit, and that is useless for editing configs as the lines are offset by the slightest amount, so when you scroll down it slowly offsets the selection then you can never actually see which line you are on. So are there any other text editors available? Or is there someone willing to fix vgedit?
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
Have you tried what is available for the various Linux builds? I don't know which ones are available for it but if you can't make a run of it from the usual suspects in the Linux world then that is not great.

I grabbed a random package list for ARM ubuntu and nano, vim, emacs, gedit, ed, and gprompter all feature. I don't know how many made the leap but more than one should have.
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
sadly no.
Have you tried what is available for the various Linux builds? I don't know which ones are available for it but if you can't make a run of it from the usual suspects in the Linux world then that is not great.

I grabbed a random package list for ARM ubuntu and nano, vim, emacs, gedit, ed, and gprompter all feature. I don't know how many made the leap but more than one should have.
op asked for homebrew
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
op asked for homebrew

Yeah I got that. I would that agree running a linux distro just for a text editor is a bit excessive but if it is presently the only way to have something viable, or a way to have something even better, there is plenty of precedent. I don't know how far https://gbatemp.net/threads/l4t-ubuntu-a-fully-featured-linux-on-your-switch.537301/ can be minimised if it turns out just a copy of say nano is needed but even if it is used as is then relative to SD card sizes these days it is not the worst.
 

Jayro

MediCat USB Dev
Developer
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
12,965
Trophies
4
Location
WA State
Website
ko-fi.com
XP
16,984
Country
United States
Yeah I got that. I would that agree running a linux distro just for a text editor is a bit excessive but if it is presently the only way to have something viable, or a way to have something even better, there is plenty of precedent. I don't know how far https://gbatemp.net/threads/l4t-ubuntu-a-fully-featured-linux-on-your-switch.537301/ can be minimised if it turns out just a copy of say nano is needed but even if it is used as is then relative to SD card sizes these days it is not the worst.
As a Raspberry Pi user, I can say that I absolutely despise using nano. I mean, Ctrl+O to save? THE HELL IS WITH THAT? Was Ctrl+S too difficult to understand?
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
As a Raspberry Pi user, I can say that I absolutely despise using nano. I mean, Ctrl+O to save? THE HELL IS WITH THAT? Was Ctrl+S too difficult to understand?
I mainly got used to it as many years ago when I came back to Linux I had a choice between nano and old school vi/vim, and as said return to Linux was to build email servers I did not need the additional hassle of learning Vim.
Had a quick search for the reasoning for using such a command scheme. As it was built as a replacement for an even older editor I imagine said older editor followed a different standard (probably some old unix mainframe thing) than the one Microsoft if not developed then pushed and saw go wide.
 

Jayro

MediCat USB Dev
Developer
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
12,965
Trophies
4
Location
WA State
Website
ko-fi.com
XP
16,984
Country
United States
I mainly got used to it as many years ago when I came back to Linux I had a choice between nano and old school vi/vim, and as said return to Linux was to build email servers I did not need the additional hassle of learning Vim.
Had a quick search for the reasoning for using such a command scheme. As it was built as a replacement for an even older editor I imagine said older editor followed a different standard (probably some old unix mainframe thing) than the one Microsoft if not developed then pushed and saw go wide.
Still, they could change it now and people would adapt. Or heaven forbid, an editor comes out that's modern-looking in a terminal window with tabs and a white background like you'd expect in a text editor.
 

Tugay

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
48
Trophies
0
Age
35
XP
135
Country
Turkey
Bump to thread. I need a text editor homebrew too. I tried vgedit but the Enter button does not work (I can't add lines) is there another text editor homebrew? Or anyone know how to add lines in vgedit?
 

nmkd

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
554
Trophies
0
Age
26
XP
775
Country
Germany
As a Raspberry Pi user, I can say that I absolutely despise using nano. I mean, Ctrl+O to save? THE HELL IS WITH THAT? Was Ctrl+S too difficult to understand?

Trust me, Nano is still better than vim (in terms of being user friendly).

But yeah I agree, Linux is good at many things, but hotkey consistency is much better on Windows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayro

vgmoose

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
360
Trophies
1
Website
github.com
XP
3,063
Country
United States
I'm stopping by to say that these issues are now fixed in the latest vgedit. It can now handle very large files with line wrapping, the cursor doesn't get offset (gets its coordinates from the text now), and issues with newlines have been fixed.

Download and changelogs are here: https://github.com/vgmoose/vgedit/releases
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye: it won't make it better or worse