uPlay+ is Ubisoft’s new game subscription service

FD5C88F7-E262-452B-BCF7-473810E5EF5F.jpeg

Need more gaming subscription services in your life? Because Ubisoft has just revealed their foray into the video game subscription service model. It’s called uPlay+, and offers over a hundred different titles, for $14.99 a month. You’ll also get access to upcoming games such as Ghost Recon: Breakpoint and Watch Dogs: Legion, as well as all DLCs. Classic games are offered too, with Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, and Beyond Good and Evil being shown during the announcement. uPlay+ will be available starting September 3rd, but if you pre-register now, you’ll be able to play free for a limited time. uPlay+ will be on PC when it launches, and Stadia later on in 2020.

:arrow: Source
 

Taleweaver

Storywriter
Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
8,689
Trophies
2
Age
43
Location
Belgium
XP
8,083
Country
Belgium
Not a bad move. If it weren't for humble bundle and/or my huge-ass backlog list of games, I might even try it for some months (okay: it needs a linux port as well). It's less hassle than pirating, and some games ubisoft makes are pretty good.

My only gripe with it is rather ironically: it's ubisoft. Their open world games and their simulation games (anno, settlers) tend to take many dozens of hours to play. This means that you can't "plow through" them like you can with indies ("this thing from my backlog looks interesting...<2 hours later>...okay: it was very good, but I'm done with it. :) ").

In other words: I'd only get it when I was unemployed, and when I'm unemployed, the first thing that I'm cutting is my gaming budget. So...to me, it's an example of something I'd never get because I am me. :unsure:
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
Awesome time for pc gamers, just registered for the free trial. Idk whether to continue subscription afterwards since for me Game Pass is the better option
 

Stwert

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
949
Trophies
1
Age
49
Location
Scotland
XP
2,524
Country
United Kingdom
This is such a great deal I'm surprised more people don't see this. I see alot of people talk about ownership, who freaking cares? How many of you really go back and play a 5 year old game? For the average Joe who wants to play the latest game this is a FANTASTIC DEAL. Pay for 4 months and that is ONE new game.


5 year old games? I still go back and play 40 year old games. I like ownership of the products I pay for, generally. I’ll grant you I don’t mind streaming services so much as I do buying a single game digitally, because I don’t feel as if I’m paying for any one product in particular.

But the days of owning our games are coming to an end. Even if we buy them physically, in ten years time we’re probably not going to be able to download the huge patches to fix bugs and add missing content. Hell look at MK11, that game needs to be online so much it’s practically pointless buying it for a collection.
 

D34DL1N3R

Nephilim
Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
3,670
Trophies
1
XP
3,220
Country
United States
It's like the good ol' rental days, but you have to buy n subscriptions from n companies to actually play all the latest titles. It's the same catastrophe that Netflix is devolving to as companies have decided it's better to splinter off to their own subscription service. Now, if you only play the latest games to beat them (which is very much what rentals was often about) it might still be a great deal. The rest of us more casual gamers who will wait 5+ years to play a game, $15/month is terrible. $5/month-$10/month total is probably about the limit before it's better to just buy older game bundles. I mean, look at how many games are sold dirt cheap right when a new release is about to announced to "drum up interest". *shrug*

At least it looks like it won't be streaming on the PC?

Agree with almost everything you said.

No "casual" gamer waits 5+ years LOL. Are you on drugs? Casual gamers are the ones consuming new media at its freshest. Casual doesn't mean occasional. There's a reason games like Madden sell like hotcakes every single year, it captures the casual audience. A more invested gamer would be more likely to research previous titles or market pricing trends. A more invested gamer is the one more likely to research older games to play and if it's worth getting the new one (because with Sports games, it never is).

You're not a "casual" gamer. You're cheap. Big difference.

$15 is fantastic. Absolutely fantastic. Someone sees $80 (in Canada, $60 USD), and might be taken aback. But $15? Fuck that's easy. Thats an hour or two of work for most people. People just keep subscribed to the service and let it run. They constantly get new games to play without huge bills attached. Win/win. It also more easily exposes casual gamers to older games thanks to the simplicity of the catalog and having every game at your fingertips.

And of course for invested gamers, the benefits are great. Want Watch Dogs 3 but know you'll beat it in a week? Buy a month of uplay+ for $15, beat it, unsub. It means a lot of people won't outright buy the game, but it also means cheapasses hyped for the game who weren't going to buy it (and more likely to buy it used) will spend the $15 to play it.

Like I said. It's a win/win for consumers and the company. It's an incredibly good tactic.


Also in regards to rentals, I paid like $10 for a week long rental. I don't give half a shit if this is just subscribing to a single publisher. A single publisher like Ubisoft or EA has a HUGE catalog of games for the price. 1000% better than rentals ever were.

Disagree with almost everything you said. And to say something like "Are you on drugs?" because someone has a different take or opinion is pretty stupid. Not going to get into the entire thing, but just for starters... it's the Madden fans who drive Madden sales. Being a casual gamer has ZERO to do with it. My son is an avid gamer who plays all types of games, often, including Madden, because he's a fan of the NFL outside of gaming. So that "casual audience" theory can be completely tossed out the window. If you look at practically any definition of casual gamer you can find online - it most certainly DOES correlate to occasional. I'm a casual gamer even though I own and play tons of different types of games, I just don't invest large amounts of time into gaming like a hard core gamer would. And guess what? I have tons of titles that are MUCH older than 5 years that I'm still waiting to play.
 

osm70

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
1,243
Trophies
1
XP
2,714
Country
Czech Republic
No "casual" gamer waits 5+ years LOL. Are you on drugs? Casual gamers are the ones consuming new media at its freshest. Casual doesn't mean occasional. There's a reason games like Madden sell like hotcakes every single year, it captures the casual audience. A more invested gamer would be more likely to research previous titles or market pricing trends. A more invested gamer is the one more likely to research older games to play and if it's worth getting the new one (because with Sports games, it never is).

You're not a "casual" gamer. You're cheap. Big difference.

$15 is fantastic. Absolutely fantastic. Someone sees $80 (in Canada, $60 USD), and might be taken aback. But $15? Fuck that's easy. Thats an hour or two of work for most people. People just keep subscribed to the service and let it run. They constantly get new games to play without huge bills attached. Win/win. It also more easily exposes casual gamers to older games thanks to the simplicity of the catalog and having every game at your fingertips.

And of course for invested gamers, the benefits are great. Want Watch Dogs 3 but know you'll beat it in a week? Buy a month of uplay+ for $15, beat it, unsub. It means a lot of people won't outright buy the game, but it also means cheapasses hyped for the game who weren't going to buy it (and more likely to buy it used) will spend the $15 to play it.

Like I said. It's a win/win for consumers and the company. It's an incredibly good tactic.


Also in regards to rentals, I paid like $10 for a week long rental. I don't give half a shit if this is just subscribing to a single publisher. A single publisher like Ubisoft or EA has a HUGE catalog of games for the price. 1000% better than rentals ever were.
Maybe for most people in your country. It's more like 4 or 5 hours of work here in my country.
 

Tarmfot

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
297
Trophies
0
XP
1,060
Country
Montserrat
However, closer to the horizon the sunlight must pass through more of the atmosphere before it reaches our eyes. This gives the rays of other colors of light a chance to be spread so that the light reaching our eyes is more a mixture of all the colors and therefore appears lighter.

I'm not sure. Closer to the Horizon would be more blue. Light travels more distance then more blue with this explanation. :-?
I 'll pay attention for this.

I do subscription service only for the free ones. I never buy a single game on steam, epic, whatever.
Perhaps gog because of not drm.
 
Last edited by Tarmfot,

eyeliner

Has an itch needing to be scratched.
Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
2,886
Trophies
2
Age
44
XP
5,510
Country
Portugal
15 dollars is a bit expensive for me.
Regarding price points, Microsoft had it right.
But this opion is welcome. Beats streaming, and for a frugal gamer like me, it isn't that bad.

Where can I buy time so I can play all the games I want?
 
D

Deleted_413010

Guest
Ubisoft is obviously making enough money to survive and pay every single one of their employees so why the need for this uPlay+ bullshit?
 

Captain_N

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
1,903
Trophies
2
XP
2,014
Country
United States
At least it looks like it won't be streaming on the PC?

That's just the beginning. It will turn into streaming after.. This is how you transition from people owning the games they buy to never owning anything. It creeps in slowly then before you know it its already there...

For those that think its good for the consumer your wrong. These companies cant wait for its consumers to own nothing and have zero control over the usage of the product.

@Memoir I prefer spending $60 on a game i can still play 30 years later. When all services for the game are long gone.
 
Last edited by Captain_N,

Jonna

Some sort of musician.
Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Messages
1,233
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
Canada
Website
twitter.com
XP
3,134
Country
Canada
They promote this type of service as if its a good thing and but you know what comes with this? Microtransactions for Single player games... Nah I'm good, Ubisoft as of lately is very medicorce to me anyway.
This comes with all the DLC, season passes and extra stuff the games have if applicable.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SugoiEndeavor @ SugoiEndeavor: What's up bakaz