Hacking CONFIRMED: No roadblocks for 7.0.1 Support on SXOS

[Meepers55]

Man, I've been looking through these posts and damn, seems like alot of people who use SXOS cant spell for shit. I wonder if this means anything?

It means they're on an internet forum, so they don't care much about spelling errors.

 

[wicksand420]

I thought it meant people where illiterate..

 

[ombus]

I thought it meant people where illiterate..

using sxos now = to being illiterate.. wow .. just to what length people will go to bash sxos eh.

 

[Deleted User]

No roadblocks ahead, Team-Xecuter will ride straight through them.
TX it rocks!

except for that sept splash screen huh?

 

[ombus]

Your mom!!!!

what the heck is your problem ?

 

[ZachyCatGames]

except for that sept splash screen huh?

Volthax is (probably?) a memer

 

[linuxares]

Volthax is (probably?) a memer

He is

 

[JoeBloggs777]

Man, I've been looking through these posts and damn, seems like alot of people who use SXOS cant spell for shit. I wonder if this means anything?

Their spellchecker is not on

 

[PatrickD85]

That exploit affects over 3 billion devices

Gotta love TSEC though but indeed it would open a whole lot of eyes from a whole lot of places for sure ...
It would be better to have something more Switch specific ... if that ever happens.

 

[aos10]

my english is not that perfect, but what do you means by "No roadblocks"?
so they gonna make it or they don't want to make it?

 

[nutsack]

my english is not that perfect, but what do you means by "No roadblocks"?
so they gonna make it or they don't want to make it?

No roadblocks means there is nothing stopping them. They're saying they can hack 7.0.1 themselves and I guess don't need to use SciresM's code?

 

[ZachyCatGames]

It would be better to have something more Switch specific ... if that ever happens.

Yea, but sadly it's not really possible to have a unpatchable switch specific TSEC expoit :/

 

[PatrickD85]

Yea, sadly it's not really possible to have a unpatchable switch specific TSEC expoit :/

Yeah it's the unicorn we want but will never have ... but as always ... the scene will eventually get something incredible.
(And for what it is worth ... the entire RCM thing being open at first was kinda that, now lets hope once Mariko units drop that something can be done to both them and current ipatched units)

 

[aos10]

No roadblocks means there is nothing stopping them. They're saying they can hack 7.0.1 themselves and I guess don't need to use SciresM's code?

hmmm, if they managed to get the method to obtain the TSEC using the new method, then they can update all the time, right?

 

[ZachyCatGames]

Yeah it's the unicorn we want but will never have ... but as always ... the scene will eventually get something incredible.
(And for what it is worth ... the entire RCM thing being open at first was kinda that, now lets hope once Mariko units drop that something can be done to both them and current ipatched units)

There will be stuff for ipatched systems eventually (on systems below 6.2.0 iirc). Mariko is looking pretty scary tho :/ (it's adding even more security features and is fixing many if not all of the currently known exploits)

 

[natkoden]

XCi loading, Emunand and Usb loading, not bad for people who don't know what they are doing

yeah, i guess that's the sole reason we don't have 7.0 compat... changing a few lines of code sure takes 1+ month

I seriously don't know why people can't accept the truth

 

[stephrk398]

@ All: as far as the implementation and priority of the emuNAND is concerned.
Here is a statement from the SciresM:

That's actually pretty revealing. He only works on things that please him. TX, however you want to cut it, works on things that please their customers. So once the Switch runs out of Pokemon games to mod then it's bye-bye Atmosphere.

 

[PatrickD85]

There will be stuff for ipatched systems eventually (on systems below 6.2.0 iirc). Mariko is looking pretty scary tho :/ (it's adding even more security features and is fixing many if not all of the currently known exploits)

Yeah I guess you are referring to the nvhax browserhax ... and that is where I kinda screwed up. My ipatched is on 7.x already.

But all in all ... all I really would want is a way to get my old saves transferred between the two.

Because really life with a superbanned and ipatched switch is not that bad (best of both worlds).
But that still seems something that will not happen soon ... ahh the horror of saves of 450+ hours of BOTW and others going towards the 100hours a piece ... is just painful not to have on the 'vanilla' 'goodie goodie' system

 

[mrdude]

Man, I've been looking through these posts and damn, seems like alot of people who use SXOS cant spell for shit. I wonder if this means anything?

Perhaps English is not their first language? I bet you'd have a few spelling mistakes if you were trying to write on a German/French/Spanish/Chinese forum.

In fact - I doubt you even thought about - which begs into question your intelligence level.

 

[DayVeeBoi]

We don't know that for sure. They may have had to change how they did things which requires slog work, but slog work that they know they can do. Or maybe they've run

For the record, I do agree with this (I was just being a smart-ass kinda) and I think that TX has made some improvements from some of the things I have been critical about in the past. I've largely abstained from any discussion or controversy regarding TX recently, but I am glad that there are people on both sides of the discussion as the last thing we need is to allow the subforum to be dominated by any particular viewpoint. Particularly one that is centered around commercial interests.

I don't have any issue with an entity making money off a product, but when that product is largely based on the opensource work of a dedicated development community, and when the optics TX are trying to spin is that they have done all the heavy lifting. Where it's not at all obvious to those less tech-oriented users that this is very much so, and in fact skews towards the opposite pole; on the surface (the UI, everything they are interacting with) is TX branded.