That doesn't make any sense. My reasons to not trust him is based on evidence of his actions, evidence that can be easily found just by going through his forums and even through his posts on this site. Deliberately ignoring this evidence and going after me doesn't change anything. Your logic here is basically just willful ignorance and comes off more as petty fanboyism.
You come over as a petty bully.
If Nintendo doesn't release it, then his claims will be false again. If they do release it and it follows his speculation, then he's actually got some crediblity. Regardless that doesn't mean anything about his past actions.
Wow, just wow. So if he reported in good faith and Nintendo then changed their mind, you think he would lose credibility? No wonder you have such a low opinion of him if your thinking is that distorted.
I am going to question your motives here. Why does it matter that I don't trust him and I think there needs to be more evidence to backup his claims?
Because you come across as a massive jerk. If you don't want to believe him then you are free to do it quietly.
Don't act like a massive drama queen and demand that someone else confirm it, because it makes other people believe that it's an acceptable way to behave in public.
No no, no not what i mean and i apologize for the confusion. While technically it IS a software patch, it's done at the factory for new systems and not something they just roll out for pre existing systems
Yes it's software, but like boot1 on the wii & metldr on the ps3 they can't change that part of the software (and neither can we) as a hash is stored in one time programmable memory. To change it you would need to be able to find a hash collision, but it's very unlikely that you'd find one that resulted in valid code.
Last edited by smf,