I've tried to theorieze around the "I'm on x, should I update to y" question a bit, and think I've come up with a good analogy for people trying to get it answered by others.
I have 72% want to play "new game" online, and 5% chance of getting easier "something, I don't bother to define, but apparently I like it", should I update from x to y?
Is an entirely impossible question to answer educatedly.
Especially in an environemen, where the next person wants to know -
Yes, and I have 64% want to play "new game" online, and 20% chance of getting easier "something, I don't bother to define, but apparently I like it", should I update from x2 to y2?
So by definition, everyone asking it isnt the brightest bunch in the bowl, and everyone engaging in answering it, is playing "what I feel, is right, I feel" kind of logic games.
The point is, that you cant ask strangers, on tips regarding bets on future developments, you are making, depending on different firmware versions and the likelyhood they will be hacked in the way that might make it more easy than the general method, or the modchip you might eventually get - whose featuresets all are not even announced yet.
The entire attempt is outright silly. The only people asking this question, are the ones with absolutely no idea whats going on, and no intention of wanting to know. Its the "I ask for shortcuts to thinking" crowd that asks that question.
And that even the firmware version they are coming from, and the ones they would want to go to, are entirely "random" in the overall picture just is icing on the cake. Three months from now, when Nintendo pushed some updates - they will be entirely diferent - regardless of any development in the field.
Asking this question now also is telling in as far as - nothing has changed from the end user perspective in the last couple of days - yet people want their "absolution" or not having to think - and ask what it means in their case.
Its incredibly revealing - in a sense... :/
If any question should be banned in here (and ultimately it shouldnt), then its this one. Its just laziness, mixed with a limited understanding of whats important, mixed with an uneasiness regarding delayed gratification, mixed with people not knowing what they want - mixed with them not being able to really voice it (piracy presumably..), mixed with them asking others for "betting tips" - regarding things that only have a likelyhood of happening, and requires knowing "how bad they want to play online" right now, ...
Its a loaded question with five variables, of which tree realy are unknowable to the person the answer is requested from.
But yet it remains maybe the most popular question in here - because no abstraction is required in asking it. I am on x - should I update? Always? One time? In the future? To do what? Contrasted with you not wanting to loose what? With what probability, because you are betting against future developments... Again, the list of implied variables is endless here.
And ultimately they only want to hear a yes or no - from about five people and then "decide" by feel. Which someone like me could "direct" in any direction btw. Currently I suggest to them to act conservatively in their update "needs", but I could just as well indicate to them to do the opposite.
The point is - that some decisions are yours to make. And we can't tell you how it will feel if you loose something, that doesnt currently exist. (The betting on future developments part.)