Homebrew (Question) Restore browser vulnerabilities on a 5.5.2 console that already has haxchi?

DonnieV

Active Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
29
Trophies
0
Age
28
XP
79
Country
United States
This is the scenario:
A 5.5.2 user who already has haxchi from when they were on 5.5.1
They install a previous copy of the browser somehow, wupinstaller maybe.
Would this restore vulnerability?
Would it have high brick risk?
Forgive me, I know nothing of how this stuff works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatmanFan

Maschell

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
1,090
Trophies
2
XP
4,646
Country
Germany
Why would you want this? Compared to haxchi the browserhack is soooooo unstable. There is NO reason to prefer browserhack
 

The Real Jdbye

*is birb*
Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
23,286
Trophies
4
Location
Space
XP
13,844
Country
Norway
This is the scenario:
A 5.5.2 user who already has haxchi from when they were on 5.5.1
They install a previous copy of the browser somehow, wupinstaller maybe.
Would this restore vulnerability?
Would it have high brick risk?
Forgive me, I know nothing of how this stuff works.
I don't know if the firmware will let you downgrade titles. With iosuhax it should be possible, but wupinstaller doesn't make use of that currently.
Brick risk should be 0 since you're not replacing an important title.
 

DonnieV

Active Member
OP
Newcomer
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
29
Trophies
0
Age
28
XP
79
Country
United States
@Maschell I haven't used browserhax since I first installed haxchi, but there's no downside to having it as a backup right?
I'm just wondering if it's possible to restore it on a 5.5.2 console that is already exploited
 
Last edited by DonnieV,

AmandaRose

Do what I do. Hold tight and pretend it’s a plan
Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
10,195
Trophies
1
Location
Glasgow
Website
www.rockstarnorth.com
XP
16,156
Country
United Kingdom
Why would you want this? Compared to haxchi the browserhack is soooooo unstable. There is NO reason to prefer browserhack
It would be useful for people on 5.5.2 incase they accidentally delete their haxchi game (Yes i am aware if they have cold boot they are fucked lol)
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
You can try to overwrite previous browser version if you know what you're doing with SysConfigTool.
 

3DSPoet

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
402
Trophies
0
XP
402
Country
United States
I haven't a clue about how Wii U works, but on the Old 3DS, you could update your firmware, then reinstall an older version of the browser for using things like Spider. The New 3DS used an entirely different browser, so it doesn't work on there...
Not sure if that's the case with the Wii U, but just a thought...
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
I haven't a clue about how Wii U works, but on the Old 3DS, you could update your firmware, then reinstall an older version of the browser for using things like Spider. The New 3DS used an entirely different browser, so it doesn't work on there...
Not sure if that's the case with the Wii U, but just a thought...
tbh, 3DS has more homebrew to install system apps easily, all we have is Nintendo's old leaked version of SysConfigTool which is capable of doing it. (It errors out if there's a problem with app if there's a problem with it)
 

aplumafreak500

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
32
Trophies
0
Age
27
Location
Meyersdale, PA
Website
www.youtube.com
XP
234
Country
United States
This is the scenario:
A 5.5.2 user who already has haxchi from when they were on 5.5.1
They install a previous copy of the browser somehow, wupinstaller maybe.
Would this restore vulnerability?
Would it have high brick risk?
Forgive me, I know nothing of how this stuff works.

I was wondering the same thing, and I don't see why it wouldn't work, especially since the IOSU wasn't updated. The only things I would really look out for are update blocking, but apart from that, with the legit ticket and TMD, it's an easy install with WUP Installer, and some quick testing.
 

Ryccardo

Penguin accelerator
Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
7,690
Trophies
1
Age
28
Location
Imola
XP
6,911
Country
Italy
Couldn't be bothered to rebuild wupinstaller without """safety""", so I just updated 5.5.1 to 5.5.2 via ftpiiu-everywhere and everything is just fine (but I'm on CBHC), going to redowngrade the browser now
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    He is now fishy.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Sak is a fishy pineapple
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    Have a good night everyone.
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    i'm getting sleepy.
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    So much drinking from @K3Nv2
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    Have a nice day. Life. Week. Month. year.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    10 tabs open on chrome and no slow downs suck it low ram plebs lol
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Firefox users be like "look at what they have to do to mimic a fraction of our power."
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    they be like which lite firefox exe pls
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Wut.
  • Maximumbeans @ Maximumbeans:
    GM all
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    butt
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    douche
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Touché.
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Push it :creep:
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Talk about propaganda.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Illinois is working to ban toxic food additives that have been banned for decades in other countries; additives that can be replaced and all those countries still have Skittles and Mountain Dew. Title of the piece: GUBMINT WANTS TO TAKE AWAY YOUR CANDY
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Gee, I wonder if the author is biased?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Veho, Sounds and smells like bullshit. They don't give you cancer, and California should know that. I don't get why they stick labels that say "may or may not cause reproductive harm or cancer".
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Arsenic doesn't give you cancer either.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    California has already banned those additives BTW.
    Veho @ Veho: California has already banned those additives BTW.