Best way to play Zelda 1/2?

zeello

The reason we can't have nice things.
OP
Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
774
Trophies
1
XP
1,223
Country
United States
I was wondering, should I play the GBA version or the 3DS eshop version? (for Zelda and Zelda 2)
The 3DS versions are only 5 bucks each last I checked. The GBA versions seem insanely overvalued, but I could just sell them afterwards, so technically their cost = cost of shipping.

I guess the reason I made this thread, is to ask whether the GBA version is worse in some regard. (such as FOV) Is it worth putting up with? By the way, it will be my first time playing through the games.
 

Ryupower

Brood
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
2,984
Trophies
1
Website
techmantis.net
XP
2,406
Country
United States
the 3ds version are the NES version, good thing is the have save state(and if you need you can 3ds notes for stuff)



the gba and nes are the SAME GAME
just some updated text
 

Arras

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
6,318
Trophies
2
XP
5,407
Country
Netherlands
This may sound obvious but the _BEST_ way to play these games is to get yourself a NES, a CRT and the original cartridges. Out of those two options though, the 3DS VC's are probably better, if only for save states.
 

Celice

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
1,920
Trophies
1
XP
628
Country
United States
I wouldn't use savestates. They really make the experience feel, for me, cheaper and less important. They turn the game into feeling like an automated chore, and that is not why I would be playing a game.

As for what's the best way, for Zelda 2, whatever you want as there's like two options beside a fan remake.

For Zelda 1, I could never get into the original game--it's not that it's an old game, but like Metroid, they're open in the sense that there's a whole lot of nothing to explore, making the world feel pretty meaningless (for me). However, playing the SNES remake was surprisingly nice--the game felt a little more fleshed out aesthetically, which made exploration fun. I think some new stuff was also added and arranged a bit.
 

Clydefrosch

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
6,022
Trophies
2
XP
4,619
Country
Germany
honestly, they're not really worth the money either way. use an emulator to try out zelda 1 though. just forget about 2 completely
 

tbgtbg

Shaking the ring ropes up in the sky
Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
1,999
Trophies
1
XP
1,026
Country
United States
The GBA versions have the screen slightly stretched due to the changed aspect ratio. I don't know about the eshop versions.
 

Vipera

Banned!
Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
1,583
Trophies
0
Location
Away from this shithole
XP
1,365
Country
United States
The first Zelda game is just like the first Metroid: cool game in the 80s, unplayable crap nowadays. If you can stand awful maps, controls and the most unfair deaths you'll encounter with no savestates, play the original. If not, get the 3DS VC version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gokujr1000

CompassNorth

Denko (´・ω・`)
Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
543
Trophies
1
Age
29
Location
Seattle, WA
XP
511
Country
United States
The first Zelda game is just like the first Metroid: cool game in the 80s, unplayable crap nowadays. If you can stand awful maps, controls and the most unfair deaths you'll encounter with no savestates, play the original. If not, get the 3DS VC version.

*Snip picture*

There's a difference between "unplayable crap" and the game being difficult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted-236924

Carnivean

STARMAN
Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
Messages
427
Trophies
0
Location
UK
XP
332
Country
The Third and Fourth Quest flavours of BS Zelda are an excellent way to (functionally) play the first zelda's two quests. The second zelda is fine as is if you are capable of thinking and can deal with the dungeons being extremely samey visually.
 

tbgtbg

Shaking the ring ropes up in the sky
Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
1,999
Trophies
1
XP
1,026
Country
United States
*snip*

There's a difference between "unplayable crap" and the game being difficult.

And Zelda is neither.

Zelda 2 on the other hand, I don't know how I ever managed to beat that, must've been a miracle. Damn, if I'd known I would have saved it for something important, like getting laid sooner.
 

Issac

Iᔕᔕᗩᑕ
Supervisor
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
7,025
Trophies
3
Location
Sweden
XP
7,344
Country
Sweden
I think the 3ds version is slightly better than the GBA version, I think the graphics was a little strange on the GBA version IIRC.

And Zelda 2 is an awesome game! Try it out for yourself and create your own opinion of it. It's one of my favourites just because it is different, hard and has experience points :3
 

Yepi69

Jill-sandwiched
Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
2,862
Trophies
2
Age
28
Location
Behind you
XP
1,776
Country
Portugal
I wouldn't use savestates. They really make the experience feel, for me, cheaper and less important. They turn the game into feeling like an automated chore, and that is not why I would be playing a game.

As for what's the best way, for Zelda 2, whatever you want as there's like two options beside a fan remake.

For Zelda 1, I could never get into the original game--it's not that it's an old game, but like Metroid, they're open in the sense that there's a whole lot of nothing to explore, making the world feel pretty meaningless (for me). However, playing the SNES remake was surprisingly nice--the game felt a little more fleshed out aesthetically, which made exploration fun. I think some new stuff was also added and arranged a bit.

Then don't use save states, honestly I don't use save states, not even with the 3DS's VC games.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    I @ idonthave: :)