Meet The Condom of the Future

[Gahars]

That's the title I've always dreamed of typing, but I never thought in a million years... kids, take this to heart: Dreams do come true!

As if the title somehow didn't explain enough, though, here's some text.

...Despite the astonishing innovations of the last 100 years, the latex condom remains woefully old fashioned. It practically hasn't changed since its invention in 1918. And I think we can all agree that condoms are universally hated—a necessary evil of safe, protected sex.

Future patron saint (should his design work the way he says) Daniel Resnic is seeking to change all that with the first non-rolled, injection-molded, engineered, silicone condom. His invention is called Origami...

According to the creator, this new condom simulates the way bareback sex feels and is actually a safer option than traditional latex condoms. From the company's website:

"Unlike the conventional rolled latex condom (indirect transferred sensation), the OMC is designed to CREATE sensation internally with direct tactile contact. It provides a reciprocating motion of the penis inside the internally lubricated condom (not possible with rolled condoms)."

Ladyish

And if you're curious what Oragami looks like...

Spoiler

Spoiler: Ha ha, but seriously...

Spoiler: It was all an elaborate ruse! Seriously, though, let's get down to business.

The future is coming and it is ribbed for her pleasure.

In all seriousness, if this works as advertised, it could be a great step forward. An even safer condom can really only be a good thing. Less disease transmission and less unwanted child births equals happiness for all. Not condoning that is just con-dumb.

Plus, I can finally call something "Whore-agami". It's a win-win-win, really.

It's quite a bit away from hitting the market, though. It still needs to go through FDA testing (I'm sure there must be some very willing test subjects); the company doesn't expect it to hit shelves until 2015 or so.

Sure, the wait sucks, but look on the bright side,: It makes for a great excuse!

 

[trumpet-205]

Good for those who are allergic to latex, another option.

 

[Tom Bombadildo]

It still needs to go through FDA testing (I'm sure there must be some very willing test subjects)

Where do I sign up??

But this is good, it's fairly surprising we haven't thought up a better solution for safer sex than a condom, it's the 21st century guys! C'mon!

 

[dickfour]

It's basically a pocket pussy you cram into your gay lover's ass. I could see this getting a cult following in the fetish community but nothing beyond that

 

[Taleweaver]

Of all the opinions the last pope had, there was one I actually agreed on...

CONDOMS FUCKING SUCK!!!!


Yeah, yeah, I know about safe sex, hygiene, birth prevention and all that. And believe me: I don't take those arguments lightly. But what's all that worth if the act itself isn't fun to do anymore?


So...yeah. I'm curious as to how this will turn out. unfold.

 

[Gahars]

It's basically a pocket pussy you cram into your gay lover's ass. I could see this getting a cult following in the fetish community but nothing beyond that

Good thing there's no model designed for heterosexual intercourse and the fact that it's supposed to be safer and more comfortable.

Oh wait.

 

[porkiewpyne]

So XXXXXXXXXL condom/whatever is durable enough + rubber band = win?

 

[ferofax]

It looks like a funnel that attaches to a big fat syringe.

Or maybe I've just seen too much weird JAVs.

It's basically a pocket pussy you cram into your gay lover's ass. I could see this getting a cult following in the fetish community but nothing beyond that

Then in that case... onaholes. Because if we're gonna talk about inside ribbing, nothing beats that except real folds of flesh tightly wrapped around... wood.

 

[dickfour]

Good thing there's no model designed for heterosexual intercourse and the fact that it's supposed to be safer and more comfortable.

Oh wait.

Comfortable for who? You put that into a chick and she ain't gonna feel a thing.

 

[Satangel]

Comfortable for who? You put that into a chick and she ain't gonna feel a thing.

Ah man I saw condom and last post by dickfour, I lolled. How do you keep doing it GBAtemp?!

 

[Gahars]

Comfortable for who? You put that into a chick and she ain't gonna feel a thing.

I take it you're speaking from personal experience with the product here, right?

 

[Tom Bombadildo]

I take it you're speaking from personal experience with the product here, right?

Ba-dum tiss!

 

[dickfour]

I take it you're speaking from personal experience with the product here, right?

What are you stupid? It doesn't fucking move. Obviously you don't understand the mechanics of female orgasms
The female version looks like something made for sex workers. I bet you could turn a few extra tricks with that. Be less likely to put the ware on your delicate honey pot

 

[omgpwn666]

What are you stupid? It doesn't fucking move. Obviously you don't understand the mechanics of female orgasms

Yep, because when most people plow, they try to think about what is actually happening to her at that very moment.

 

[Gahars]

What are you stupid? It doesn't fucking move. Obviously you don't understand the mechanics of female orgasms

(If you had bothered to check the source first, maybe watching the attached video...)

 

[porkiewpyne]

What are you stupid? It doesn't fucking move. Obviously you don't understand the mechanics of female orgasms

By that "logic", males can't orgasm with the traditional condom because they don't "fucking move" either.

So unless the female's vagina and all share the same size and structure of a cave, she will be able to feel something. Reduced sensation maybe. But that's pretty much it.

Knowing the mechanics of (female) orgasms is useless when the logic is thrown out the window.....

 

[Sicklyboy]

Nothin beats bare-backing it.

NOTHIN.

Not to say I wouldn't use this. Most definitely would.

 

[p1ngpong]

I can't wait to try this out on all of ur mums.

 

[WiiUBricker]

These do look like sex toys, not condoms.

 

[porkiewpyne]

These do look like sex toys, not condoms.

Pretty sure those prototypes are more rigid than the real deal as seen in the vid in the source.