Hardware wii and haters and graphics

[zragnarok]

Peresonally I'm really sick of fancy graphics now. In the end, if the game sucks...what's the point? (take for example...PSP...where are all the good games for it? And don't say GTA...that's ONE game). Nintendo DS has extremely crappy graphics but why is it that I take my DS with me more times than I take my PSP with me? Its because the games are so much better and people know that.

Now take PS3 for example...why should I buy the PS3 for a remake or Warhawk when I can get the Nintendo Wii which has all the similar games but has an entirely new control interface for it. Suddenly you're having more fun than your friends.

In the end, having fun is what gaming is. Not how freaking cool you are. If owning a better graphic system makes you cool then you better start souping up your PC.

Edit: Oh and jumpman...the Wii is exactly like the DS in this case. So I don't think there is much to worry about...there are many PSP fanatics that converted to the DS because there are good games on that system. All in time things will balance to the way the games are...not the graphics.

graphics are nothing, but its obvious you are a fanboy. the psp has many bad games and it has quite a few good games: LocoRoco, Lumines, Katamari, etc...

All these Nintendo fanboys keep saying the DS has AWESOME GAMES!!!!!... but really, like for every good DS games there is at least 10 crappy ass ones. Just goto IGN or Gamespot and look at the DS reviews, besides a small handful of A+ titles, the average game is a 5/10 POS like Tenchu. The good to bad games ratio is no better than the PSP

Just because a system has good graphics, doesnt mean it has crappy gameplay.... why cant you have both... why do you automatically assume that the PS3 has crappy games cause it has good graphics, and assume that the wii will have awesome games becuase it has mediocre graphics... so you have a PS3? do you have a wii?

 

[pinesal]

Peresonally I'm really sick of fancy graphics now.  In the end, if the game sucks...what's the point?  (take for example...PSP...where are all the good games for it? And don't say GTA...that's ONE game).  Nintendo DS has extremely crappy graphics but why is it that I take my DS with me more times than I take my PSP with me?  Its because the games are so much better and people know that.

Now take PS3 for example...why should I buy the PS3 for a remake or Warhawk when I can get the Nintendo Wii which has all the similar games but has an entirely new control interface for it.  Suddenly you're having more fun than your friends.

In the end, having fun is what gaming is.  Not how freaking cool you are.  If owning a better graphic system makes you cool then you better start souping up your PC.

Edit: Oh and jumpman...the Wii is exactly like the DS in this case.  So I don't think there is much to worry about...there are many PSP fanatics that converted to the DS because there are good games on that system.  All in time things will balance to the way the games are...not the graphics.



graphics are nothing, but its obvious you are a fanboy. the psp has many bad games and it has quite a few good games: LocoRoco, Lumines, Katamari, etc...

All these Nintendo fanboys keep saying the DS has AWESOME GAMES!!!!!... but really, like for every good DS games there is at least 10 crappy ass ones. Just goto IGN or Gamespot and look at the DS reviews, besides a small handful of A+ titles, the average game is a 5/10 POS like Tenchu. The good to bad games ratio is no better than the PSP

Just because a system has good graphics, doesnt mean it has crappy gameplay.... why cant you have both... why do you automatically assume that the PS3 has crappy games cause it has good graphics, and assume that the wii will have awesome games becuase it has mediocre graphics... so you have a PS3? do you have a wii?

Yeah, well when you have 100s (aka a lot more than PSP has) of games you are going to get a lot of crappy ones. Look how many crappy games are on PS2 but nobody will argue the fact that most of the best games of it's generation are PS2 exclusive.

And while I will not tell you than PS3 will have crappy games I will tell you that Wii sounds like the most fun system to own. And PS3's focus is graphics, that's obvious.

 

[Scorpin200]

Well santakuroosu or whatever ur called what exactly is a fanboy? if you mean a loser getting mad over a lame game well that's you, and im simply just stating a point since i have better things to do than throw away my money on a game system just cause the japanesse say so. How did sega lie? very easily since nintendo now owns them in a way, and what i was saying abut the ps2 is that it wasn't impressive to begin with. Although it's graphic capabilities are somewher near to what the ps3 seems to do, but the ps2 can do about the same type of visials it's just i think they rather not make a game that plays at 5-10 frames a sec ya know. This is where these new systems come in they upgrade things that the old ones couldn't possibly handle....some people just don't take the time to think about it, but back to sega they died because they lied to people by making a new system every 2 years or so that was exactly the same with minor upgrades....sega cd sound familar. Lol i said all that in one sentence an everyone else seemed to get it, but there always is one out ofthe bunch who has a lacking of simple understanding.

P.S sony is decent for making a hackable system, but it sure as hell ain't no pc for sure...good quote by the way Renegade

 

[Hitto]

Well santakuroosu or whatever ur called what exactly is a fanboy? if you mean a loser getting mad over a lame game well that's you, and im simply just stating a point since i have better things to do than throw away my money on a game system just cause the japanesse say so. How did sega lie? very easily since nintendo now owns them in a way, and what i was saying abut the ps2 is that it wasn't impressive to begin with. Although it's graphic capabilities are somewher near to what the ps3 seems to do, but the ps2 can do about the same type of visials it's just i think they rather not make a game that plays at 5-10 frames a sec ya know. This is where these new systems come in they upgrade things that the old ones couldn't possibly handle....some people just don't take the time to think about it, but back to sega they died because they lied to people by making a new system every 2 years or so that was exactly the same with minor upgrades....sega cd sound familar. Lol i said all that in one sentence an everyone else seemed to get it, but there always is one out ofthe bunch who has a lacking of simple understanding.

Have you read your own post to see if it made any sense?

I beg to differ, I hoped you'd apologise to him instead of spouting stupid bullshit before I'd finally rack enough motivation to call you a perfect imbecile. Now, I am the first one to know and understand that it's really useless to insult someone over the internet, but I can only explain your case as being an educational charity. That, and you would never understand "LURK MOAR".

PS : Speaking of lies, you could've talked about "BLAST PROCESSING", but you probably weren't even born at the time sega did "what nintendon't". And even then, it's pretty tame compared to the "emotion engine is teh banned in china becoz it builds nuclear bombs, omglolwtf" sonyspeak. As for the multiple useless addons for the megadrive/genesis, that was them shooting themselves in the foot, not lying to their customers. Well, at least kind of customers who breathe with their mouth closed and who have never bought a Jaguar or 3DO.

tl;dr : Dreamcast != Saturn u fukkin l0ser

 

[Veho]

About the crappy versus good games debate, about 80% of all games on all consoles are crappy clone wannabes, 10% are decent, and 10% are great. If you have a thousand games for a console, you will find 100 good ones. If you have 5 games, you might not even find one good game.

And the problem with portable consoles, both DS and PSP, is that nobody seems to take them seriously.
When you say "portable console", people (and developers, unfortunately) think "gameboy", "gba" at best. So they don't really bother with quality, they just put some stuff together just so they could have a game on every console out there. Most portable console games look just like their mobile phone Java versions: crappy. Sad but true.

And I really don't see the point of the argument "the DS has tons of great games, while the PSP has only one", or "The PSP has tons of great games, while the DS has only Tetris".

WTF?!? If you don't own a console, you don't care about the games it can run, so of course you don't know if they are any good. You only know of the most advertised ones. There can be tons of good games for the console, but you would miss them if you don't keep yourself informed, and of course raving fans of one console won't keep themselves informed about a different console.

The only ones who can compare the consoles are the people who own them both, and play both of them. The rest of you, shut up.

And, by the way, any real gamer has to have both consoles, so he/she wouldn't miss good games that are out on the "other" console.

Shunning/trash-talking a platform because you own another one = being a nerdy fanboy.

So shut up. You're just jealous because you don't have enough money to buy both.

Thank you.

 

[Hitto]

About the crappy versus good games debate, about 80% of all games on all consoles are crappy clone wannabes, 10% are decent, and 10% are great. If you have a thousand games for a console, you will find 100 good ones. If you have 5 games, you might not even find one good game.

And the problem with portable consoles, both DS and PSP, is that nobody seems to take them seriously.
When you say "portable console", people (and developers, unfortunately) think "gameboy", "gba" at best. So they don't really bother with quality, they just put some stuff together just so they could have a game on every console out there. Most portable console games look just like their mobile phone Java versions: crappy. Sad but true.

And I really don't see the point of the argument "the DS has tons of great games, while the PSP has only one", or "The PSP has tons of great games, while the DS has only Tetris".

WTF?!? If you don't own a console, you don't care about the games it can run, so of course you don't know if they are any good. You only know of the most advertised ones. There can be tons of good games for the console, but you would miss them if you don't keep yourself informed, and of course raving fans of one console won't keep themselves informed about a different console.

The only ones who can compare the consoles are the people who own them both, and play both of them. The rest of you, shut up.

And, by the way, any real gamer has to have both consoles, so he/she wouldn't miss good games that are out on the "other" console.
Â
Shunning/trash-talking a platform because you own another one = being a nerdy fanboy.

So shut up. You're just jealous because you don't have enough money to buy both.

Thank you.

God Dammit! Has the weather forecast predicted an idiot rain or something for today?
First, just because one does not own a specific console doesn't mean one has never played it. PSP was an interesting experiment - now we know that portable consoles need high battery life and games, and do not need any gimmicky addons like MP3 or movie playback, as there are specifically-designed machines that do it better, and cheaper. Oh, wait. Everybody knew that apart from sony.

Second, I have enough money to buy hetero AND gay porn, well guess what, I still am NOT interested in the gay porn! See how stupid your analogy sounds? I'm even less inclined to shell out my easily-earned and plentiful money for either a SIX HUNDRED DOLLAR ELECTRONIC TOY or a soon-to-be-dead portable console. At least gay pornos I can give to elderly ladies for the shock value alone.

Finally, you wanna call other people "real" gamers? Who are *you* to judge any gamer? 'Cuz let me tell you one thing, if you own one of EACH competitor's console, just to prove yourself or ... "us"

... (read : total strangers who wished they saw less retarded "LOLOLOL I CAN BUY ALL CONSOELS U R TEH POOR GET A JOB LOLOL" remarks) how much of a gamer god you are, then you can keep your "title", champ.

Fuck, everywhere's turning into either /v/, gamefags or ign, nowadays.
Fuck.

 

[Veho]

And why oh why haven't you read my post before jumping to... well, "conclusion" implies a thought process, doesn't it, and I wouldn't like to associate any kind of thought process to your rant...

First, just because one does not own a specific console doesn't mean one has never played it.

I played three games on the PSP, and all of them sucked. This, however, does NOT mean that all the games are crap, so neither I, nor anyone else with a similar experience, have the right to say that. The logical flaw in that is called "generalisation", but in most cases, it's called "being an idiot".

and do not need any gimmicky addons like MP3 or movie playback, as there are specifically-designed machines that do it better, and cheaper. Oh, wait. Everybody knew that apart from sony.

And apart from the thousands of people using Moonshell on their DS. Oh, wait, they don't count, do they? Why play mp3's on your DS when you can dish out several hundred dollars for a separate mp3 player? Not to mention that every mobile phone nowadays has mp3 and movie playback. Gee, I guess phone manufacturers don't share your amazing insight, either.

Second, I have enough money to buy hetero AND gay porn, well guess what, I still am NOT interested in the gay porn! See how stupid your analogy sounds?
Funny how the first thing to spring to your mind is gay porn. Where the hell did I use an analogy that sounds like that to anyone but you?

QUOTE(Hitto @ Sep 21 2006, 02:23 PM)I'm even less inclined to shell out my easily-earned and plentiful money for either a SIX HUNDRED DOLLAR ELECTRONIC TOY or a soon-to-be-dead portable console.

A $600 electronic toy? If you have ever bothered to look at the hardware specs of the stupid thing from an IT point of view, you would know that such hardware compares to servers or mainframes, while being infinitely cheaper. You could (well, not you, obviously), someone who knows what a computer is, could find several hundred good uses for the PS3, without ever playing a game. If all you see when looking at the PS3 is a toy, well, grandma, go back to your knitting. We won't bother you with those pesky "computers" anymore.

As for the "soon-to-be-dead", every console is about to expire. Within a year, mobile phones will have more processing power than PSP, DS and an iPaq put together, and I guess that means the iPaq is soon to be dead, too.

QUOTE(Hitto @ Sep 21 2006, 02:23 PM)

Finally, you wanna call other people "real" gamers? Who are *you* to judge any gamer? 'Cuz let me tell you one thing, if you own one of EACH competitor's console, just to prove yourself or ... "us"

... (read : total strangers who wished they saw less retarded "LOLOLOL I CAN BUY ALL CONSOELS U R TEH POOR GET A JOB LOLOL" remarks) how much of a gamer god you are, then you can keep your "title", champ.

Having one of every console just to "prove" something is a sure sign of a small penis.

Playing computer games is a recreational activity to most, and a hobby to some. And just like any other hobby, it can grow to Olympic proportions. The difference between the REAL gamers and the rest of us is the same as the difference between hobby golfers and miniature-golf players. The same difference as between reading the funnies in the papers, and having a Garfield collection.

I'm saying that anyone shouting "ZOMFG I AM TEH R0XX0RZ UBER GAMER I RULE ALL GAMES", without ever playing anything else than a PSP, is a moron. Wow, mister gamer, I'm so humbled by your prowess at killing time. Wheee.

I have a radio controlled model plane. Does that make me a hobby modeller? No. So I won't talk about Monokote versus Lacque, Spitfire versus Stuka, Hobby towers glue versus Revell glue. I will keep my mouth shut.

Similarly: I have a GC, a DS and a GBA. I don't have a PSP. I don't have a SNES or N64, I don't have an Xbox, PS1/2/3 (although I might buy a PS2 when the price drops after the PS3 launch).

And therefore, I'm not a real gamer either. I play, occasionally, recreationally. I'm not a real gamer.
And that's why I've never, ever said anything on the topic of "this console better than that console", "this portable better than that portable", this over that, all rabid fanboyism, foaming at the mouth, thinking that "objectivity" is a city in Korea.

So if I can keep my big fat mouth shut on the subject, so can you. SHUT UP.

 

[Hitto]

Actually, since you freely admit that you have no clue in the field we're discussing, and since your time machine allows you to see that PS3 linux won't be the exact same fucking pile of shit the PS2 crippled linux was, or that a cell is something you can treat exactly like an x86, and that as an average consumer, seeing gaming become some sort of micropayment shitfest while most of you aren't even phased by this kind of news, being used as a guinea pig AND cannon fodder in the Blu-Ray army, well YES, I would rather like to talk about how a particular company harms the industry as a whole with its dickheaded tactics and fucking nintendo-1994-level arrogance which turned most recent games into steaming piles of shit. It's not an old-schooler knee-jerk reflex, it's not some sort of elitist power trip, it's simply become *boring*. I haven't bought one of the next-gen consoles neither at launch or used, but my friends and family covered all of the bases. I've played enough wind waker to get so fed up I never bothered to finish it (which is blasphemy in my opinion), mario sunshine to stop hating it and realize it was just a shitty generation, halo and its sequel enough to get used to some kid calling me a "cocksucking n**** jew faggot allah ackbar nazi communist frog" every frag, I got bored in shadow of the colossus' empty landscape and its equally intellectually pretentious that even a french art fag can't stomach (and believe me, I *like* mindless kitsch stuff) prequel, and base my opinions on facts.

If YOU don't know shit - then it's ok for you to shuddap. Don't assume everybody else on the net is an internet tough guy that doesn't know what he's talking about. When we give our input, it's based on each user's personal experience, which is the only reliable source of information, since it doesn't rely on advertisement and other censor-prone systems. Popping up on a forum to say "hay guyz, I'm motherfucking Socrates, I know nothing, therefore you don't either, so stfu!" is kinda like posting "I don't care".

Ok, enough hate in there, I love you, man.

And I treat all companies the same way. I cannot yell enough times in a day my favorite mantra : "FUCK NINTENDO AND ESPECIALLY NINTENDO OF EUROPE".

AS A CONSUMER. I'm not defending a particular company. I hate all of 'em equally ^^

 

[Veho]

AS A CONSUMER. I'm not defending a particular company. I hate all of 'em equally ^^

That's the most beautiful thing I've heard all day

.

Just one thing, though. I know the difference between Cell architecture and x86 architecture, and I know they can't be treated the same. But I wasn't talking about PCs, I was talking about mainframes (and, subsequently, servers), where the Cell processor would work much better than an x86.
The x86 architecture is a heap of un-optimised, Jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none crap. An optimised dedicated processor at 1GHz works better than a P4 at 4GHz.
The fact that x86 are most common is the result of company policies much like Sony's. "Force it on people. They will buy it if we don't offer an alternative." Yes, that harms the industry, but more importantly, it harms us, the end users, even more.

And I didn't say the PS3 should work with PS Linux. The PS2 Linux was written by enthusiasts, who stopped when they were happy with the result, or just got bored with it. No real developer/programmer worked on it, because the PS2 was, after all, just a games console.

The PS3, however, is more. Maybe it happened by mistake (God knows Sony would never give us anything we haven't (over)paid for), but the PS3 could be used for more than just games.
Now, if anyone was to use the PS3 as a server, they wouldn't rely on some fan-based, half-baked homebrew OS, they would write their own. And with professionally written software, the PS3 could work great.
(I'm still not getting one, though

)

QUOTE(Hitto @ Sep 21 2006, 04:29 PM)Don't assume everybody else on the net is an internet tough guy that doesn't know what he's talking about. When we give our input, it's based on each user's personal experience, which is the only reliable source of information, since it doesn't rely on advertisement and other censor-prone systems.

I would like to think that, but it's not true. You may know what you are talking about, but the majority doesn't. When they give their imput, it's based on hearsay and bias, not facts and objectivity. Sad but true. And there is no "fanboy filter" to filter out those kind of oppinions, just like there is no "asshole filter" to filter me out

Peace, and

cheers.

 

[richardv]

I like Gay porn.

 

[Kyoji]

The x86 architecture is a heap of un-optimised, Jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none crap. An optimised dedicated processor at 1GHz works better than a P4 at 4GHz.
The fact that x86 are most common is the result of company policies much like Sony's. "Force it on people. They will buy it if we don't offer an alternative." Yes, that harms the industry, but more importantly, it harms us, the end users, even more.

Maybe I'm wrong here, and a bit off topic, but doesn't a chip, and therefore architecture, used by everyone for everything have to be a jack of all trades? Why would the masses want an optimized 1Ghz processor thats great at task, when they will be using their computer for , AND tasks? They wouldn't, it'd run everything that isn't like crap.

But anyway;

Do you actually have a PS3, Veho? Have you used it as a server? No? Then, according to your argument, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. I'm not saying you don't, just throwing some light onto the invalidity of your argument. (For the record, I think buying a PS3 solely for any other purpose than gaming would be foolish, but I digress)

I dont own a PSP. But, I know that certain aspects of it suck; aspects I've never even used. Such as the mp3 playback-limited by high priced Duo sticks, and the size of the portable. Video-limited by format, Duo sticks, battery life, etc. And games..lord. Granted, the PSP has some good games. But the majority of it is unoriginal and uninspired. But how do I know this? Well lets see, when I've played the same games on a console and didnt like them, chances are I wont like them now. When I read or hear the opinion of someone I trust, I take their word for it, so I can come to valid conclusions without even playing the game myself. And honestly, if an entire internet community doesn't like a game, chances are it sucks. Nobody on this planet has the mental or physical capability to fully know everything about anything. I don't have the time nor funds to buy every system, every game and "judge for myself". Thats why the internet is so great, because I can found out about these things without dropping a dime.

That doesn't mean I don't come to my own conclusions through experience, sometimes these conflict with popular held opinions, but alot of the time I come to the same end everyone else did. You put far too much emphasis onto the individual experience, and not enough onto the collective knowledge of communities such as this. Why do you think so many here continually make the same topics about "Wut flashcatre shuld i get" or "I'm going on vacation, give me games to bring along!"? Because they dont know, and instead of wasting hundreds of dollars finding a cart they like themselves, or bringing suck games on a trip with them, they prefer to avoid the trouble and just ask.

Some people speak up with no idea what they are talking about, this is true. But when you've played the "star" games on a specific console, and have read about the others, I think you are in a pretty good position to draw some conclusions about game quality on that console.

Essentially, you don't have to own all the consoles, and of played all the games to know what you are talking about.

 

[Golds]

I think the games will pull most people in toward the machine they want.

I will probably save up and get a PS3 late next year just for Final Fantasy and all the RPGs that will come after. The wii probably wont have many RPGs, that thats what keeps me away from it.

However, the wii will have the tried and tested "classic" games, that you know will be great. Mario's, Zelda's, and now movement based.

I've seen blu-ray and hd-dvd and they dont look any better than current dvds. Just the menu system is ALOT cooler, and the sound it ALOT better. And both of these DVD markets are relying on every single person getting an HDTV with at least 1080i dvi/hdmi. It will happen one day, but not anytime soon. Prices are so high for these TV's still its amazing. (however you can get a TUBE HDTV 27" for about 350.00, with 1080i hdmi).

Now for the real question, which system will guitar hero 3 be on? Thats what everyone will buy.

 

[Scorpin200]

Sorry about that guy i didn't know that was ur boyfriend, and does make sence it's just u need an actual iq to read it. Who are u exactly? for someone who doesn't even know me you sure act like it, but i have no time to play lil kid games with ya. Mabye you should get a life outside videogames then you would see that it doesn't mean much, but you'll probaby want to give all ur money to sega and sony anyway

.

viva la revolution

p.s LURK MOAR!? i think i've just been insulted in Klingon

 

[santakuroosu]

Sorry about that guy i didn't know that was ur boyfriend, and does make sence it's just u need an actual iq to read it. Who are u exactly? for someone who doesn't even know me you sure act like it, but i have no time to play lil kid games with ya. Mabye you should get a life outside videogames then you would see that it doesn't mean much, but you'll probaby want to give all ur money to sega and sony anywayÂ

.

viva la revolutionÂ

p.s LURK MOAR!? i think i've just been insulted in KlingonÂ

And here we have the common forum troll's behaviour when faced with defeat: Feeble insults to the other parties involved in the discussion.

 

[Hitto]

I'm sorry scorpy, next time I'll remember you have the attention span of a goldfish.

But it seems that on every videogame-related topic you feel like you need to show the world you exist, by dissing nintendo if we're talking about DS games, sony if we're talking about sony stuff, and sega, for fuck's sake. THEY'RE ALREADY DEAD! When was the last fucking good sonic game you ever played? That's right, you weren't born back then. Well, it was even better on a console rather than the rom.
Anyway, you bitch and moan and rant without any incentive, and never provide insightful information whenever you post here. It's really annoying. Since telling you to try to type in a language most people who communicate with speech instead of cellphone text messages cannot read anymore didn't work, and since you seem to not have or want a clue, I think it is better if you stop engaging people in such an aggressive way. I don't know if you have someone bullying you between classes, if your mom die, or if your girlfriend doesn't want to suck your cock or something, THIS PLACE IS NOT A VENTING GROUND FOR FRUSTRATIONS.

Now go back to writing naruto fanfics or making winamp skins or whatever you twelve year olds do on the internet, and let the grownups talk.

PS : LEARN SOME FUCKING ENGLISH, I AM FUCKING TIRED OF THE TEXT MESSAGE SPELLING YOU USE.

 

[Scorpin200]

Lol funny stuff i can't believe how some nerds who have no life get made over some lame game

, and it means nothin to me cause i don't really care whne this topic is about the wii but oh well.

vi va la revolution

 

[Covarr]

Lol, funny stuff. I can't believe that some nerds have no life, and get mad over some lame game.Â

It means nothing to me, because I don't really care as long as I'm on topic talking about the Wii.

Viva la revolution.Â

I cleaned up your post a little, so that people can understand what you're saying, and so that you can get an idea of what a proper post looks like.

For the record, "Sorry about that guy i didn't know that was ur boyfriend" has nothing to do with Wii. It's just you being an asshat trying to stir up a fight. The way a discussion works is that people say valid points either for or against the issue at hand, and other people either agree or disagree and explain why. Your point carries more merit, though, if you use proper grammar and punctuation. Otherwise, no matter how intelligent your idea is, people will think you're an idiot. If you don't even make a valid point, though, and instead resort to insults and other derogatory comments, what you're actually doing is agreeing with the other person, by showing that the people who disagree, such as yourself, are jerks or idiots.

If you have a valid point to make, then by all means go ahead and make it. Otherwise, leave the discussion to people who have gotten past middle school.

 

[imgod22222]

I'm sorry, i just want to add something to my previous post. I have a reason for hating xbox-360. Because its from Microsoft, and Microsoft makes PCs, so IMO the game (at least the good games) aren't that far from being PC games.
*If what i said even mattered*

 

[Scorpin200]

Here is the proper description for people like you looossseerrr i really don't care much for games that much as they don't mean anything to me enough to get upset, but unlike you i have a actual life outside of my house......it's still funny to hear it though.

 

[Covarr]

y dont u get a actual life at shcool were u can learn to use english

just becase we have hobby doesnt make us loserr, at least we r smart and have jobs to pay for videogames not like u who will have to work at mcdonalds since u are too good to learn at schol.....

Take a look at my post count. You'll notice that it's lower than yours. This could be interpreted to mean that you post here more than I do, because I spend more time outside of my house than you, and don't spend as much time at these boards. Also, the way you described us, as "looossseerrr", shows a lack of elementary spelling skills, likely because you are "too cool for school". I'm sure you have a brain, so use it, or else the only "looossseerrr" in here is yourself.