Reviewing my Ivy Bridge Build

Discussion in 'Computer Games and Technology' started by ThePowerOutage, Apr 29, 2012.

Apr 29, 2012
    • Member

    ThePowerOutage The Lord of the Flyes

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Message Count:
    813
    Location:
    Vallhallah
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Building a new computer using Ivy Bridge.
    Budget £500

    CPU: i5 3570K £170.58
    Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G43 £76.52
    GPU: MSI HD 6770 1GB £71.60
    RAM: 2x4GB Corsiar XMS3 1333 £37.92
    PSU: Antek VP450P 450W £30.54
    HDD: Seagate Barracuda 6Gbs 500GB £56.38
    CPU Cooler: Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7 V2 £16.45
    Total = £469.58
    The HDD could be better, but I didn't want to spend more.
    GPU will to upgraded at end of year.
    Is the ram overkill? I'm not too sure.
    I already have a case and DVD writer.
    Any suggestions?


    • Member

    Originality Chibi-neko

    Member Since:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Location:
    London, UK
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Sounds pretty complete to me.

    8GB of RAM is pretty much the standard these days. 3GB minimum, 4GB for normal operation, and 8GB for future-proofing. 12+GB if you want to use a RAMdrive.

    Only suggestion... Get a legit copy of Windows :)
    • Member

    ThePowerOutage The Lord of the Flyes

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Message Count:
    813
    Location:
    Vallhallah
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I can get a legit copy of vista from my father, so that's no issue.
    No really point buying win 7, 80% of the time vista is just as good provided you have the correct drivers
    • Member

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member Since:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    27,885
    Location:
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Country:
    United States
    ^ ohshit

    Inb4 haters
    3 people like this.
    • Banned

    Midna Banned!

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Message Count:
    3,336
    Country:
    Albania
    Er, uh, I hope your father isn't paying for Vista. This deal only sounds worthwhile if someone is paying your father to take copies of Vista away
    And, not to be rude, but I disagree with originality. There is literally no disadvantage for the user in using a cracked copy of windows, as long as the right activator is used
    2 people like this.
    • Member

    mysticwaterfall Streamforce Supreme Commander

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,868
    Location:
    Right behind you
    Country:
    United States
    Beyond the legit vs non-legit debate (even though, for my 2 cents I would never trust an acquired copy of windows), sticking with Vista is just plain silly. Windows 7 outperforms it in almost all areas and has a much better UI.
    • Member

    AceWarhead "Must Construct Additional Pylons"

    Member Since:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,193
    Country:
    United States
    Vista... is slow, sluggish, and crashes alot.
    Even a cracked Windows 7 on the place where people go arrgh is better
    • Member

    Krestent What to post?

    Member Since:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Country:
    United States
    This. My Windows box crashed 5 times in that many days running Vista, and 0 times in that same period of time running 7. This is with a clean install.
    Also, edit out the torrent website.
    • Member

    Originality Chibi-neko

    Member Since:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Location:
    London, UK
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I only suggested legit Windows to show that there's nothing else I can really suggest. I personally won't judge anyone whether they use legit or cracked Windows since I've been using cracked Windows all my life up to Vista. 7 is the only version I've bought (twice) because as a student at the time I got it for $30/£30.

    And I've never had any problems with Vista. Sure, 7 is better, but I never had the problems others have had with Vista.
    • Member

    Zetta_x The Insane Statistician

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,812
    Country:
    United States
    Before I started working where I work, they moved everyone over to Vista 60+ computers. It worked fine at first, but given the large amount of people, weird things started happening especially with a lot of the software they use are either made by the people I work for or non-commercial ones. I was looking through the trouble tickets and weird bizarre things Vista would do. With 60+ people all the same software (different hardware) you would expect some consistency. Not only that, but the ones that did manage to not have many problems, their start up would take forever after a year. I don't know how long they endured vista for (it was before my time) but when I got there, everyone who didn't have a new computer was reverted back to Vista. For about a year now, all of our Windows 7 ready computers were changed from XP to 7 and have had nothing like what I have seen for Vista.

    But you are only one person, there is always some chance what you do will suffice.
    • Member

    brandonspikes King Erazer

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,509
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Sure you do, the fact you use it means your computer is using more resources than it should be.

    OP, replace the CPU with a 2500k and get a better graphics card, a 6870 will be much better.
    A 3570K is not an upgrade over a 2500k in the gaming world.

    http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/38421-intel-core-i5-3570k-22nm-ivy-bridge/?page=7


    Also, Pick a better PSU, 450W is kind of low.
    • Banned

    Midna Banned!

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Message Count:
    3,336
    Country:
    Albania
    2500k is basically the cost effective god of processors for gaming and otherwise. Awesome processor.
    • Newcomer

    itchigo New Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    24
    Location:
    Earth
    Country:
    United States
    ur build is good all u need is a better powersupply.
    im also upgrading my pc, here the lists of my new setup:

    Case: Rosewill Thor V2 White Edition
    Motherboard: ASUS P8Z77 V-PRO
    CPU: Intel I5 3570K
    RAM: G Skill 8gb DDR3 1600
    GPU: Powercolor Radeon hd 7970
    SSD: 120 GB
    HDD: 1TB 7200 rpm and 2TB 5900 rpm
    Powersupply: Rosewill 1000 Watt
    Cooler: XSPC Rosa 750 RS240 Universal Water Cooling kit
    Mouse: Logitech G500
    Keyboard: Microsoft Sidewinder X6

    I'll upload a video when i'm done with my build.
    • Member

    ThePowerOutage The Lord of the Flyes

    Member Since:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Message Count:
    813
    Location:
    Vallhallah
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    I think getting a higher quality PSU is better that getting a higher wattage PSU. That PSU can run the system fine for now, if necessary it can be updated later.
    I heeded the advice here and went with the 2500K. I also switch my motherboard to a Gigabyte Z77-DH3 for better OSx86 support.
    Thanks for the help

    NOTE: As I previously mentioned, I rarely use windows, so Vista should suffice. But worst comes to worst, Windows 7 is only an hour away ;)
    NOTE2: Your PSU is overpowered. 1000W PSU's are for workstations, not gaming rigs.
    • Member

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member Since:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    27,885
    Location:
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Country:
    United States
    Let's not even start on that bullshit.
    BTW, Windows 7 does the same fucking thing and you don't see people bitching about it (because it's not called "vista").
    • Member

    brandonspikes King Erazer

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,509
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Windows 7 has better memory usage, faster loading time, better overall program optimization's, better compatibility with software/hardware, better gaming performance, protection, stability etc..
    • Member

    Zetta_x The Insane Statistician

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,812
    Country:
    United States
    You waited because whether or not you are going to use the Ivy bridge processors, prices for Sandybridge are going to drop.

    So you either get the new processor or get a cheaper price for what you would have paid a few months ago (which is usually true in electronics regardless if something comes out)
    • Member

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member Since:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    27,885
    Location:
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Country:
    United States
    What's the matter, never checked the damn requirements? Vista states 512MB-1GB, 7 states 1GB-2GB... and 7 and does the same preloading of programs as Vista (which is why people ran Vista, saw the RAM usage numbers climbing compared to XP, and started freaking out without knowing what the fuck was going on).

    Yes, thankfully that's one improvement they made.

    This has shit to do with the OS and all to do with the programs being run. This is often thought of because at the time that Vista came out, programmers were still being LAZY AS FUCK (well, they're still lazy as fuck now, but they were even worse back then), and a large number of them were NOT programming for compatibility with XP. (Outside of drivers) things written FOR XP should work on Vista out of the box.

    And things that were written FOR XP did.

    The problem is most programmers were not writing for XP. They were writing 9x code that happened to run on XP due to XP being backwards-compatible with the methods being used. Microsoft has been posting warnings for YEARS about deprecated program methods, but people were still writing shit code (writes directly to program files, doesn't use appdata, assumes admin) because it still ran on XP.

    Well, then Vista came out, and the companies realized they actually needed to update their coding practices for shit to work on it.
    That took a while, so by the time 7 came out, the fixed versions of the programs had been realeased.
    You can go out and take the same programs people said wouldn't run on Vista, and find the latest versions run on Vista now because they've actually been updated.

    As for hardware support; that's due to drivers, that's a third-party thing, and that follows the same timeline (though even harsher, as between NT5 and NT6 the models for some things like video changed, so old drivers neededs a rewrite from the start).

    Less than 2% difference.
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2864/14

    On what grounds?
    And yes, this is a serious question and I expect a serious response with proof, no anecdotal evidence. Issues of computer security are very serious and I will NOT tolerate any bullshitting around on that topic.

    Bullshit, state proof.
    1 people like this.
    • Member

    brandonspikes King Erazer

    Member Since:
    May 30, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,509
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    [IMG]
    7 uses less resources.


    As for protection, Windows 7 has a lot better stock protection than Vista, And that matters for people who dont know how to use a computer properly, in my case its true, Windows 7 has better protection Vs windows vista, I guess my only source right now is
    http://www.techradar...15167?artc_pg=3

    Also, In terms of gaming, 2% is 2% is 2%, Its an increase in any way to see fit, so my point is still valid,

    In terms of stability, That's more of a personal thing, While using 7, I have never had a BSOD,Crash, Or OS freeze, ever.

    During my vista years, Ive had many a month, and that wasn't due to fault of hardware, I can assure you.


    Windows 7 runs faster, takes up less memory when in stock, and boots faster than Vista, that alone is worth an upgrade, not only that, but has better future support in the long run.


    Edit: Not only that, But 7 has a slew of new handy features over vista, and just overall feels better
    • Member

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member Since:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    27,885
    Location:
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Country:
    United States
    Can I get a source for that? Lik, one showing the actual tests run and all that jazz.

    The only difference that article states is in the customization of UAC, but the issue is that turning the setting lower is LESS secure as it allows more things to happen without your consent.

    Grasping at straws, much? I mean, that's the same kind of attitude as trying to sell somebody insurance for a plane falling out of the sky and onto their house, because it does have a chance of happening. :P

    In the cases tested, the difference was less than 2FPS. If your games are at the point where that's an issue, the problem is in hardware, not software. If the difference was more (say, ~10FPS at 60FPS base which is about 15%) then yeah there'd be a problem, but it's not nearly to that level.

    I'm not talking personal experience, that has no play in this. This thread is not about you, it's about suggestions for the OP, and if you're going to be making accusations you should have proof.

    Any way you can toss me the dump logs (C:\Windows\Minidump\) so I can see what caused it?

    If not, that's anecdotal.


    As said, 2% in gaming. The only noticeable difference was in NAS performance, and that's been addressed since the test was run.

    Excuse me, but I already covered that piece of bullshit and I'm going to have to ask you to not repeat it.


    Up to the OP if they care or not (as many people leave their machines running for days or weeks at a time so differences may not even come into play).

    Agreed, but if the build here is temporary and within the lifecycle that doesn't matter.

    Personal opinion, up to the OP to decide.

    I think you have the wrong point. I'm not saying that Vista is better.

    I'm just trying to bash the bullshit that's been posted. If you post bullshit (that is, factually inforerect things), I will call you on it.

    EDIT: I R RYDIAN, I CAN FINISH MAH SENTENCES.
    After I edit...
    2 people like this.

Share This Page