Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'GBAtemp & Scene News' started by Chary, Feb 14, 2017.
Because, i think that Nintendo shoud not force players to pay in order to have a part of the story.
I am a huge fan of Zelda: i like its story, its universe. I pay my game to discover them, but having to pay to have a part of the story (and a hard mode) is just dumb.
Looks like they are starting to become like others developers that sold incomplete games...
its not part of the story, its a different story. and no one is forcing you to buy it
I know, but in my mind, what makes Nintendo different is that they dont force you to pay more to have more. You pay ONE time and you get the entire game and free addons if they exist (Splatoon for exemple).
It is sad they are doing it.
they already did it before with mario kart and smash bros for example, and everyone liked those dlcs
If you have a Wii U then you should know that SSB and MK8 had paid DLC.... It wasn't bad DLC either, it was well worth the $15 or so dollars for it all. What's to say the would do the Zelda franchise wrong? You're joining the "All consoles and publishers have DLC, but NINTENDO IS DOING NOW TOO! *THROWS DESK*" crowd.
I didn't think about these DLC, I must admit.
I am a little more calm now.
It is just i am really afraid they make things like: "You like these part of the game, pay 10 euros to get more".
Let's just hope they will be like Mario or FE DLC...
Lucina DLC/mods when?
Calm down, I was talking about FE Revelation xD
FE: fates had crapton of paid doc, and some of them expand the story, you never seen anyone complaining about those because you can get them for free :^)
How else was Nintendo gonna sell their online service, if their best games are offline?
We'll hear soon that the next Mario game needs online services to run.
Someone doesn't understand what "online services" means
So you'd rather it just not exist?
Because the game is already feature complete.
What they're selling is developed after the game has been completed, thus it wouldn't exist otherwise you fucking idiot. They're obviously not selling the ending of the game. It's likely just filler story they want to explore more of to enrich the players knowledge.
You trying to to justify stealing their hard work is pathetic. You object by not buying or playing the content, not stealing it. You're not taking any sort of moral highground, you're just misguided and proving nothing.
with all this DLCs being announced before launch. I hope Nintendo doesn't pull an an Asura's Wrath and keep the best/true/most dramatic ending from a paywall..
Let me know what your feelings are when the DLC releases and it does not infact contain a third of the new content the base game has. Infact, it won't even be a 1/20th.
Then don't buy it, you dumb monkey. It's optional. Guaranteed anyone buying it will be because they love the game and want more. If I play and enjoy the game for 100 hours, then $20 for hard mode and some hours more content is more than worth it.
I always find it funny when people object to content creation because they're too cheap to buy it.
Yeah, it's nothing like Namco Bandai where they charge 3 dollars per outfit, totaling up the 200 dollars (if you want all dlc that is)
as long it doesn't put the true ending on some sort paywall like EA/squenix, maybe it's ok. but damn nintendo, this is disappointing.