Misc Kid Icarus: Uprising High Value Weapon Online matches thread

[gamefan5]

Go look WAY back at the topic because that is EXACTLY what I've said.

I know, but you just said "pics or it didn't happen," when clearly, before, a pic wasn't enough for you.

Notice that this was the second person. U think one pic is enough?
Dude, do you know how to make research? You think one instance of having said weapons makes it as a fact when the pic is rather skeptical? I've only seen ONE person saying it has one. And ONE pic of a weapon with 342 as a value. Is it weird? For one that played the game a lot and that farms 9.0 intensity. Yes. IS it believable? Hardly. But go on, say that I'll deny every pic that doesn't suit my liking or that defeats what I've researched.
At this point, I rather ignore what you've said. Because what I've said still applies.
Shove a freaking vid on my face or a plethora of 342 weapons and that's when I'll believe.
Good day.

 

[TripleSMoon]

Notice that this was the second person. U think one pic is enough?
Dude, do you know how to make research? You think one instance of having said weapons makes it as a fact when the pic is rather skeptical? I've only seen ONE person saying it has one. And ONE pic of a weapon with 342 as a value. Is it weird? For one that played the game a lot and that farms 9.0 intensity. Yes. IS it believable? Hardly. But go on, say that I'll deny every pic that doesn't suit my liking or that defeats what I've researched.
At this point, I rather ignore what you've said. Because what I've said still applies.
Shove a freaking vid on my face or a plethora of 342 weapons and that's when I'll believe.
Good day.

I never said I believed it. I was just pointing something out.

You having never seen it before does not count as "research." That would be like saying that I don't exist because you looked all over North Carolina and never saw me. If one of the game designers or sakurai came out and said "yeah, the max value is 341," THAT would be research. Playing the game and farming high-intensity weapons and never seeing a 342 is NOT research.

You really can't stand it when people disagree with you, can you? I'm just pointing something out and stating an opinion, and you're turning it into a personal attack. So I'm just gonna stop here before it gets worse.

 

[gamefan5]

Notice that this was the second person. U think one pic is enough?
Dude, do you know how to make research? You think one instance of having said weapons makes it as a fact when the pic is rather skeptical? I've only seen ONE person saying it has one. And ONE pic of a weapon with 342 as a value. Is it weird? For one that played the game a lot and that farms 9.0 intensity. Yes. IS it believable? Hardly. But go on, say that I'll deny every pic that doesn't suit my liking or that defeats what I've researched.
At this point, I rather ignore what you've said. Because what I've said still applies.
Shove a freaking vid on my face or a plethora of 342 weapons and that's when I'll believe.
Good day.

I never said I believed it. I was just pointing something out.

You having never seen it before does not count as "research." That would be like saying that I don't exist because you looked all over North Carolina and never saw me. If one of the game designers or sakurai came out and said "yeah, the max value is 341," THAT would be research. Playing the game and farming high-intensity weapons and never seeing a 342 is NOT research.

You really can't stand it when people disagree with you, can you? I'm just pointing something out and stating an opinion, and you're turning it into a personal attack. So I'm just gonna stop here before it gets worse.

Uh? Aren't you typing to me? Unless I'm talking to a bot.
How is it not? I'm pretty sure experimenting is a vital part of collecting info. It's like medecine...
For a cure to be said that it works, it needs to be experimented lots of times, not just once. Saying that it works once, don't make it reliable at all.
The same could be said about this info. Happening it once dooesn't make it true unless a believable proof is shown or unless there is enough evidence supporting this fact. Which in this case, there isn't.

 

[TripleSMoon]

Uh? Aren't you typing to me? Unless I'm talking to a bot.
How is it not? I'm pretty sure experimenting is a vital part of collecting info. It's like medecine...
For a cure to be said that it works, it needs to be experimented lots of times, not just once. Saying that it works once, don't make it reliable at all.
The same could be said about this info. Happening it once dooesn't make it true unless a believable proof is shown or unless there is enough evidence supporting this fact. Which in this case, there isn't.

Whatever you say, man.

 

[gamefan5]

Uh? Aren't you typing to me? Unless I'm talking to a bot.
How is it not? I'm pretty sure experimenting is a vital part of collecting info. It's like medecine...
For a cure to be said that it works, it needs to be experimented lots of times, not just once. Saying that it works once, don't make it reliable at all.
The same could be said about this info. Happening it once dooesn't make it true unless a believable proof is shown or unless there is enough evidence supporting this fact. Which in this case, there isn't.

Whatever you say, man.

Hahahaha. That says a lot. Thanks I needed a laugh. XD

 

[Zerosuit connor]

Uh? Aren't you typing to me? Unless I'm talking to a bot.
How is it not? I'm pretty sure experimenting is a vital part of collecting info. It's like medecine...
For a cure to be said that it works, it needs to be experimented lots of times, not just once. Saying that it works once, don't make it reliable at all.
The same could be said about this info. Happening it once dooesn't make it true unless a believable proof is shown or unless there is enough evidence supporting this fact. Which in this case, there isn't.

Whatever you say, man.

@[member='xwatchmanx']
I am totally on your side
+1 Watchman is right

 

[gamefan5]

Uh? Aren't you typing to me? Unless I'm talking to a bot.
How is it not? I'm pretty sure experimenting is a vital part of collecting info. It's like medecine...
For a cure to be said that it works, it needs to be experimented lots of times, not just once. Saying that it works once, don't make it reliable at all.
The same could be said about this info. Happening it once dooesn't make it true unless a believable proof is shown or unless there is enough evidence supporting this fact. Which in this case, there isn't.

Whatever you say, man.

@[member='xwatchmanx']
I am totally on your side
+1 Watchman is right

Whatever you say, man.

 

[Zerosuit connor]

Uh? Aren't you typing to me? Unless I'm talking to a bot.
How is it not? I'm pretty sure experimenting is a vital part of collecting info. It's like medecine...
For a cure to be said that it works, it needs to be experimented lots of times, not just once. Saying that it works once, don't make it reliable at all.
The same could be said about this info. Happening it once dooesn't make it true unless a believable proof is shown or unless there is enough evidence supporting this fact. Which in this case, there isn't.

Whatever you say, man.

@[member='xwatchmanx']
I am totally on your side
+1 Watchman is right

Whatever you say, man.

Whatever you say, man.

 

[TripleSMoon]

Whatever you say, man.

Whatever you say, man.

Whatever you say, man.

Oh good grief, look at the monster I created!

Anyway, to be fair, I think I should redact something from my statement... You're right, GameFan, all that experience IS research. I made an extremely poor choice of words. What I SHOULD have said is that it isn't proof against it's existence. What I mean to say is, just not seeing the 342 valued weapon doesn't disprove it's existence. It just shows that we don't know. And until we have more proof that either it exists, or one of the game devs comes out and says "yeah, 342 isn't possible," then we have no way of knowing. That's all I was trying to say.

 

[gamefan5]

Whatever you say, man.

Whatever you say, man.

Whatever you say, man.

Oh good grief, look at the monster I created!

Anyway, to be fair, I think I should redact something from my statement... You're right, GameFan, all that experience IS research. I made an extremely poor choice of words. What I SHOULD have said is that it isn't proof against it's existence. What I mean to say is, just not seeing the 342 valued weapon doesn't disprove it's existence. It just shows that we don't know. And until we have more proof that either it exists, or one of the game devs comes out and says "yeah, 342 isn't possible," then we have no way of knowing. That's all I was trying to say.

*Sigh, I never said it didn't exist. I said that for the believed max to be changed, there needs to be enough evidence. For now it's considered to be 341. In fact, I'd like to compile everyone's weapon that exceeds 341. So far, I only got 1. Doesn't say much.

 

[TripleSMoon]

*Sigh, I never said it didn't exist. I said that for the believed max to be changed, there needs to be enough evidence. For now it's considered to be 341. In fact, I'd like to compile everyone's weapon that exceeds 341. So far, I only got 1. Doesn't say much.

I see what you mean.