I'm getting stuck on Stopping WC24. I'm guessing it's the same step I was getting stuck on on the <2.1 versions.
Also getting stuck on Stopping WC24 for some reason. Gonna try disabling it under settings if it isn't already.
edit: Disabled it and it still gets stuck there. Strange.
edit: Disabled it and it still gets stuck there. Strange.
Last edited by Deleted member 424658,
I wonder if it needs the opposite, having it and wlan enabled or something, I remember having both enabled maybe only for that case that call is needed and it otherwise just freezes? That'd be quite questionable design by nintendo but oh well, would not be the first time.
Tried it out. Works great, thanks a lot 
Something I could notice however is that when you do several sequenced downloads, whether transmitting the same or a different software, the download speed gets slower and slower, up to a point that the download stops in mid-process (whether it's downloading the download station client or the software we want to play). This gets kinda restarted when restarting the Wii, but keeps happening if you do several downloads again. As far as it goes it doesn't really affect anything besides cancelling if it gets too slow, but I find it worth mentioning. Thanks anyway, it's surely a wonderful application
Something I could notice however is that when you do several sequenced downloads, whether transmitting the same or a different software, the download speed gets slower and slower, up to a point that the download stops in mid-process (whether it's downloading the download station client or the software we want to play). This gets kinda restarted when restarting the Wii, but keeps happening if you do several downloads again. As far as it goes it doesn't really affect anything besides cancelling if it gets too slow, but I find it worth mentioning. Thanks anyway, it's surely a wonderful application
maybe you should try set the delay timing higher then because at a certain limit (seems to be different from wifi chip to chip) the sends just get so close together that it starts failing sends and taking forever to actually get a packet sent over.
So @Lyrin and @dpad_5678 maybe see if this file prints out some constant error number maybe.
https://mega.nz/#!dggiyAxB!BuuaQhZ8Rnk1wOC7h5DiZujIggx0OKEGhfvuHuRi8EY
https://mega.nz/#!dggiyAxB!BuuaQhZ8Rnk1wOC7h5DiZujIggx0OKEGhfvuHuRi8EY
You need to be connected to wifi for it could stop freezing there. I used to have the same problem.
maybe also try the file I posted yesterday before and after so we can maybe see some difference that I can then easly handle and fix in a v3.1.Thanks for the tip mate. Will try it when I get home.
Of course it does LOL good thing I stepped away from the code for a bit; that entire code bit was not required and actually did something that is not even required for this, only got into the code in the first place thanks to my copy-paste from some nintendont code in which I copied too much over, so now I pushed v3.1 which should fix this issue and should make it boot quicker too
Newest version works great, even sends a rom that didn't send before which doesn't work due to needing dldi I guess, but it sends which is cool!
just to test it i have tried to boot it with my n3ds xl (EUR) . It is stuck on "Downloading..." but the packets finished downloading
I had done so. It never worked. Until i rebooted. I don't know why, but then it worked.
Retails roms don't work. Only download play demos, nes/gbc roms (I think roms smaller than 2 MB), and homebrew without dldi.Thanks @FIX94 ! Awsome work as always.
edit: nes (guessing gbc haven't tried yet, edit: gbc works fine, pokemon crystal is 2.1 mb and sends) roms over 2 mb don't work, which is strange since the nesDS singles builds a rom that's about 3.3 MB with a 2.1 MB rom in it. How come the nesDS build you have increase the file size so much?
Last edited by Deleted member 424658,
Similar threads
-
Psionic Roshambo
-
BakerMan
The snack that smiles back, Ballsack!
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
the vram is one advantage when it comes to AI but ends up being slower even with that and really AI is the only use case that needs more than 12gb vram right now -
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I think I watched a video where two games at 4K where eating just over 16GB of RAM and it's the one case where the 7900XT and XTX pulled ahead (minus RTX of course)
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
So my opinion is that they could age a bit better in the future, and maybe AMD will continue improving them via drivers like they tend to do. No guarantee there but they have done it in the past. Just a feeling I have.
-
-
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
they definitely will age better but i feel dlss might outweigh that since it looks about as good as native resolution and much less demanding+1
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
AMD could introduce something comparable to DLSS but nvidia's got a lot more experience with that
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
least amd 7xxx has tensor cores which the previous generations didn't so there is the potential for AI upscaling
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
-
-
-
@
BakerMan:
Have you ever been beaten by a wet spaghetti noodle by your girlfriend because she has a twin sister, and you got confused and fucked her dad?
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I had a girlfriend who had a twin sister and they would mess with me constantly.... Until one chipped a tooth then finally I could tell them apart.... Lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
They would have the same hair style the same clothes everything... Really messed with my head lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to maybe close the gap a bit with Nvidia. Plus it would kinda put Nvidia at a future disadvantage since Nvidia can't make X86/64 CPUs? Intel and AMD licensing issues... I wonder how much that has held back innovation.
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to...