Former GBAtemp member and suspected pedophile gets 20 year sentence

Shawnj · Apr 25, 2017

Costello said:
to anticipate any questions:
- Cruel did not post any child porn on the forums
- he did not exchange any child porn via PM nor make any appropriate attempts to contact anyone
- no evidence was found that he did anything illegal in relation with GBAtemp
- we were not asked by the police or by any authority to provide any kind of information
- he has not used his account since March 3rd which is 2 weeks before the trial

Anything else you wanna know just ask. We have absolutely nothing to hide or to cover. I decided to post this thread as soon as I heard someone was accusing us to 'cover' the story, that is downright ridiculous.

Can you do people viewing this post a favor and link this https://imgur.com/gallery/un69v image next to the Reddit thread for people who want to view the now removed thread? Thanks. Also, could you clarify what happened with Dazazzo with regards to GBAtemp in this post as well? Thanks.

Costello · Apr 25, 2017

Shawnj said:
Can you do people viewing this post a favor and link this https://imgur.com/gallery/un69v image next to the Reddit thread for people who want to view the now removed thread? Thanks. Also, could you clarify what happened with Dazazzo with regards to GBAtemp in this post as well? Thanks.

done

bostonBC · Apr 25, 2017

Ew...this is disgusting.

>>>A preview of the suspect's computer "revealed tens of thousands of images of child pornography," police said in a report. Edvalson's computers were seized.<<<

That isn't his 'GoDaddy' servers where he hosted how a how-to guide for setting up CP sites this was his home PC.

Might give him the benefit of the doubt on if his server was hacked but having tens of thousands of CP pics on your home PC means you are a sick fuc*.

20 years sounds about right.

Deleted-355425 · Apr 25, 2017

And people here are still defending these baby rapers in plain sight for all to read, I hope the police are making a list of all of you that are strait up defending him and think there is no problem.

miraclaime · Apr 25, 2017

Not even phoenix wright can help this pedophil trial ...good luck man

Alkéryn · Apr 25, 2017

mech said:
And people here are still defending these baby rapers in plain sight for all to read, I hope the police are making a list of all of you that are strait up defending him and think there is no problem.

I defend inocent pedophile, not him since he is guilty

Deleted-355425 · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
I defend inocent pedophile, not him since he is guilty

There is no such thing as an innocent pedophile. You are part of the problem.

Alkéryn · Apr 25, 2017

mech said:
There is no such thing as an innocent pedophile. You are part of the problem.

No
First I am not a pedophile, one of my best friend is
Second if someone is a pedophile, he didn't choosed to so you can't balme him for that, you don't choose your sexual attraction, and even if you consider it as a mental disorder, then they should be helped before they do something bad, not persecuted

pedophile != rapist
By definition a pedophile is just someone attracted by child

and as long as they don't commit any crime they shouldn't be jailed but helped instead
the vast majority of pedophiles are inocent and live their whole life abstaining themselves but the only time you hear about one, it is because he comited a crime

JCCG1989 · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
No
First I am not a pedophile, one of my best friend is
Second if someone is a pedophile, he didn't choosed to so you can't balme him for that, you don't choose your sexual attraction, and even if you consider it as a mental disorder, then they should be helped before they do something bad, not persecuted

pedophile != rapist
By definition a pedophile is just someone attracted by child

and as long as they don't commit any crime they shouldn't be jailed but helped instead
the vast majority of pedophiles are inocent but the only time you hear about one, it is because he comited a crime

That is your partial opinion based on a case, you can't even bet your life to your own friend telling you ALL the truth. Usually people that comit those crimes does not confess them to their friends or family. You build a case and make statements solely on your personal opinion where the reality yells at you it's otherwise.

NightScript · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
No
First I am not a pedophile, one of my best friend is
Second if someone is a pedophile, he didn't choosed to so you can't balme him for that, you don't choose your sexual attraction, and even if you consider it as a mental disorder, then they should be helped before they do something bad, not persecuted

Um, you do realise, that people have brains for a reason, right? They can make their own desicion....

So your arguement is invalid...

Alkéryn · Apr 25, 2017

JCCG1989 said:
That is your partial opinion based on a case, you can't even bet your life to your own friend telling you ALL the truth. Usually people that comit those crimes does not confess them to their friends or family. You build a case and make statements solely on your personal opinion where the reality yells at you it's otherwise.

No the reality support my point
you hear about them only when they commit a crime
but their are far more pedophile than child rapist
which only mean that the vast majority or at least a good portion of them don't commit crimes

No they didn't choose to be pedophiles as much as you don't choose to be heterosexual or gay so you can't blame them for that
BUT if they do commit a crime they should be in jail
But they should be jailed just for their sexual attraction which they didn't choose

JCCG1989 · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
No the reality support my point
you hear about them only when they commit a crime
but their are far more pedophile than child rapist
which only mean that the vast majority or at least a good portion of them don't commit crimes

No they didn't choose to be pedophiles as much as you don't choose to be heterosexual or gay so you can't blame them for that
BUT if they do commit a crime they should be in jail
But they should be jailed just for their sexual attraction which they didn't choose

I'll just quickly correct your point... You hear about them when THEY GET CAUGHT. You assume every child molester is caught in a moment of his life and the reality is totally the opposite. Many cases can develop for years and the subjects NEVER beign investigated by any authority, so your point is totally silly. So, will you trust your child to your beloved friend?

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Alkéryn said:
No the reality support my point
you hear about them only when they commit a crime
but their are far more pedophile than child rapist
which only mean that the vast majority or at least a good portion of them don't commit crimes

No they didn't choose to be pedophiles as much as you don't choose to be heterosexual or gay so you can't blame them for that
BUT if they do commit a crime they should be in jail
But they should be jailed just for their sexual attraction which they didn't choose

And for last damn time. You don't blame for their twisted idea of sexuality, you blame them for the damage they do to other people, molesting kids or promoting said activity by consuming child pornography.

NightScript · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
No the reality support my point
you hear about them only when they commit a crime
but their are far more pedophile than child rapist
which only mean that the vast majority or at least a good portion of them don't commit crimes

No they didn't choose to be pedophiles as much as you don't choose to be heterosexual or gay so you can't blame them for that
BUT if they do commit a crime they should be in jail
But they should be jailed just for their sexual attraction which they didn't choose

Why does it say that you quoted my post? Did you mean to quote me?

Alkéryn · Apr 25, 2017

JCCG1989 said:
I'll just quickly correct your point... You hear about them when THEY GET CAUGHT. You assume every child molester is caught in a moment of his life and the reality is totally the opposite. Many cases can develop for years and the subjects NEVER beign investigated by any authority, so your point is totally silly. So, will you trust your child to your beloved friend?

I know that but that don't mean either that every pedophiles are child molesters, in fact most of them are not and just don't tell it to avoid being persecuted
But i think they should be helped before risking to commit a crime

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

maorninja said:
Why does it say that you quoted my post? Did you mean to quote me?

Yes but you removed a part of the quote flags so the quote isn't showed even if you get the notifcation

Thunder Hawk · Apr 25, 2017

Shawnj said:
Can you do people viewing this post a favor and link this https://imgur.com/gallery/un69v image next to the Reddit thread for people who want to view the now removed thread? Thanks. Also, could you clarify what happened with Dazazzo with regards to GBAtemp in this post as well? Thanks.

To be honest that damn thread shouldn't have even existed. It should have just died with the Freeshop thread, but alas it was made because some person claimed this was a "cover up" on something completely unrelated.
Anyway, as for the reddit thread, it really had no place on /r/3dshacks, even if it was made with good intentions. (I really didn't want to downvote almost post, but that's what I ended up doing.)

Cruel is one thing, but Dazzozo is another. They shoudn't have been connected.

The Shack Staff made an official statement was made with the reason why it was removed:
"While the intent of this thread was good, the manner in which it was executed was incredibly poor, leading to witch hunting, brigading, and overall doing more harm than good." Source

Plailect took it to himself and abused the reputation he recieved as being the bible writer, effectively getting everyone to upvote his message to give the impression that it was a very importent PSA. It wasn't. We never needed it.

He even stated himself:
"...intended on leaving the country in order to have sexual relations with this minor... When confronted, Dazzozo made no attempt to deny this behavior; instead, he stated that he was unaware that the sex tourism laws applied"
And that's it. Nothing else happened. Nothing at all. No contact. No meeting. No nothing.

Now, I do not have these "explicit conversation logs", so I cannot confirm if Daz intended to have sexual relations or not.

"and all information has been turned over to the relevant authorities."
Good. It should have stayed like that. Nothing else needed to be done, but Plailect decided to make the thread anyway. Good job, you did more harm than good.

Anyway, why should everything Plailect said be taken at face value? He even stated himself that he is a minor. "I am also a minor. It is because of this that I am especially dedicated to protect those of this scene that cannot protect themselves."

JCCG1989 · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
I know that but that don't mean either that every pedophiles are child molesters, in fact most of them are not and just don't tell it to avoid being persecuted
But i think they should be helped before risking to commit a crime

No, it does not mean ALL of them do but you lack any evidence stating "most of them are not".

Alkéryn · Apr 25, 2017

JCCG1989 said:
No, it does not mean ALL of them do but you lack any evidence stating "most of them are not".

Yeah right
first of all you realize that they are humans being so they know their action could traumatize someone life

The problem here is that many pedophile would like to confess to a psycholog but they don't because by doing so they risk prison

plus if you look in the statistics 90% of child rapist arent actually pedophiles but just rapist

JCCG1989 · Apr 25, 2017

Alkéryn said:
Yeah right
first of all you realize that they are humans being so they know their action could traumatize someone life

The problem here is that many pedophile would like to confess to a psycholog but they don't because by doing so they risk prison

plus if you look in the statistics 90% of child rapist arent actually pedophiles but just rapist

Well, it seems like you're more wrong that you think, take in account you're talking with a physician... First, in most countries mental health care professionals like psychologists and psychiatrist are under the phyisican/professional-patient secret policy, so said professional would be punished for releasing sensitive information of a patient when said patiend IS NOT under investigation for a crime (so if the petient never admited a rape the professional cannot release any information). Clinically and psychologically a rape it an act of power and domination, that's why common rapist tend to overpower their victims and then raping them, unlike child rapes where usually it fulfills the rapist sexual urges using the inocence of the child and the power position of the adult, so your statement is totally false, can you please make me know where did you get those percentajes. The reality is (and maybe you became confused at this point) 90% of child rapes are performed by close relatives.

FAST6191 · Apr 25, 2017

mech said:
And people here are still defending these baby rapers in plain sight for all to read, I hope the police are making a list of all of you that are strait up defending him and think there is no problem.

Point me at where you think those posts are.

I am seeing a bunch of people say "unless you actually hurt someone, or have solid plans to" (and possession of a video is considered as such as harm would have been done to make it) then do consider getting help and try to live your life as well as you can. You know, what the law, principles in law making and those of most ethics actually say. Pending something showing that the conversion rate is so high as to warrant some kind of intervention (and given I don't know of anywhere with an active screening program for positions involving at risk individuals, just places with legal history lookups the law would seem to indicate that is how it thinks too) then I am not sure how one can really advocate for such interventions, at least other than from a purely emotional place.
There have been some serious misunderstandings about the nature/definition of fetishes, sexualities, paraphilias, mental disorders and laws concerned (curiously I am seeing some say CGI is OK where that is against the law in many locations, though on the basis of harm done that is not an untenable platform), seen as not everybody is versed in law and such that is not unexpected and discussion and corrections do seem to come. Also the specifics of this case seem to be scarcely discussed despite the cases apparently being linked earlier.
I can see most deleted posts and histories and there is not even anything there either.

The kid fucking bit, nobody is saying that is OK. I can safely say that shit would not fly either.

The worst I am seeing is some seemingly advocating for some kind of thoughtcrime.

Alkéryn · Apr 25, 2017

JCCG1989 said:
Well, it seems like you're more wrong that you think, take in account you're talking with a physician... First, in most countries mental health care professionals like psychologists and psychiatrist are under the phyisican/professional-patient secret policy, so said professional would be punished for releasing sensitive information of a patient when said patiend IS NOT under investigation for a crime (so if the petient never admited a rape the professional cannot release any information). Clinically and psychologically a rape it an act of power and domination, that's why common rapist tend to overpower their victims and then raping them, unlike child rapes where usually it fulfills the rapist sexual urges using the inocence of the child and the power position of the adult, so your statement is totally false, can you please make me know where did you get those percentajes. The reality is (and maybe you became confused at this point) 90% of child rapes are performed by close relatives.

Well even if you are a physician, it add no value to your argument
if you were a philosoph then maybe, but even in this subject, when we are abording law, a subject should not be judged if he didn't choosed in a councious mind something exept if he represent a treat to the civilisation
so a "low risk" pedophile shouldn't be judged but one who commited a crime or is in a state of mind that make him very likely to do so, should be put in jail

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

FAST6191 said:
Point me at where you think those posts are.

I am seeing a bunch of people say "unless you actually hurt someone, or have solid plans to" (and possession of a video is considered as such as harm would have been done to make it) then do consider getting help and try to live your life as well as you can. You know, what the law, principles in law making and those of most ethics actually say. Pending something showing that the conversion rate is so high as to warrant some kind of intervention (and given I don't know of anywhere with an active screening program for positions involving at risk individuals, just places with legal history lookups the law would seem to indicate that is how it thinks too) then I am not sure how one can really advocate for such interventions, at least other than from a purely emotional place.
There have been some serious misunderstandings about the nature/definition of fetishes, sexualities, paraphilias, mental disorders and laws concerned (curiously I am seeing some say CGI is OK where that is against the law in many locations, though on the basis of harm done that is not an untenable platform), seen as not everybody is versed in law and such that is not unexpected and discussion and corrections do seem to come. Also the specifics of this case seem to be scarcely discussed despite the cases apparently being linked earlier.
I can see most deleted posts and histories and there is not even anything there either.

The kid fucking bit, nobody is saying that is OK. I can safely say that shit would not fly either.

The worst I am seeing is some seemingly advocating for some kind of thoughtcrime.

Well i think it is better that a pedophile watch cgi or hentai to lower his pulsion rather than actually rape someone or commit child abuse
but if he watch IRL child porn, then he is guilty since it did harm a real person

Well-Known Member

Headmaster

Well-Known Member

Deleted-355425

Guest

custom themes maniac

Moon Dweller ~

Deleted-355425

Guest

Moon Dweller ~

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Moon Dweller ~

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Moon Dweller ~

Firefox Master Race

Well-Known Member

Moon Dweller ~

Well-Known Member

Techromancer

Moon Dweller ~

Similar threads

Popular threads in this forum