Reggie Fils-Aime claims that Nintendo will have a "big" E3 this year

Gadd · Mar 27, 2017

I play botw with slowdown on my wii u but it ain't no big thing, most of the time it's smooth and I'm always having fun brah

Spider_Man · Mar 27, 2017

Gadd said:
I play botw with slowdown on my wii u but it ain't no big thing, most of the time it's smooth and I'm always having fun brah

well nintendo are not innovative then if they cant drum a basic game down to improve its frame rate, yet has the same issue on its "next gen" console.

when we can see game devs release massive games such as GTA and are able to make it work with minimal issues on the 360/PS3, yet nintendo cant get a basic cell shaded title to run smoothly when docked on its next gen console which is their 2nd console during the same geneartion.

how is this innovation, its imitation and sugar coating shite to make it seem better than it actually is.

im sure soon some fanboy will quote and try demand nintendo are the best, im to accept their flawed opinion while they disregard my opinion based on facts, not fanboysm, but they cant accept negative comments for something they love.

Gadd · Mar 27, 2017

botw isn't a fair test...it was designed on the wii u and quickly ported to switch....time was of the essence. wait until the first game that is made for switch, probably mario odyssey

Spider_Man · Mar 27, 2017

Gadd said:
botw isn't a fair test...it was designed on the wii u and quickly ported to switch....time was of the essence. wait until the first game that is made for switch, probably mario odyssey

find that hard to beleive, nintendo deliberately delayed it to make it a launch title to help make the switch sell better.

but logic fails, if your claiming nintendo made a game for a last gen system, then if anything it should perform better on the new system?

nintendo would have more likely made the game for the switch and dumbed it down for the wii u, again hence its delay.

mario is a completely different type of game, its not going to be an open world game like zelda (elder scrolls clone) mario will have a small town you run around then enter separate levels.

Gadd · Mar 27, 2017

it's different hardware, so it's not optimized for switch, it's optimized for wii u. and it was close to being released for wii u, we would have had it over a year earlier, but they decided to do the switch so they delayed the release for wii u, there's no way to make it perfect for switch but by making it from the ground up, they didn't pull that off in a year. the hint that it was made for wii u, and not switch as you theorize, is of course the sheikah slate, which is the wii u gamepad. it was originally designed to implement the wii u gamepad but tthey took that out to make both versions "equal"

Futurdreamz · Mar 27, 2017

I'm just saying that the dlc format may be another way to provide vc games. I thought I was pretty clear on that but I'll try to clarify that.

First you buy the NES emulator from the eShop. It comes with five or more games (and their licenses) such as Mario bros, The Legend of Zelda and Zelda II, etc. Games we consider to be classics. Then in the eShop you can buy additional games/roms/licenses that get added to the emulator, either individual games or bundles of similar games. A lot more organized then having every single rom separate, and potentially cheaper too.

Spider_Man · Mar 27, 2017

Gadd said:
it's different hardware, so it's not optimized for switch, it's optimized for wii u. and it was close to being released for wii u, we would have had it over a year earlier, but they decided to do the switch so they delayed the release for wii u, there's no way to make it perfect for switch but by making it from the ground up, they didn't pull that off in a year. the hint that it was made for wii u, and not switch as you theorize, is of course the sheikah slate, which is the wii u gamepad. it was originally designed to implement the wii u gamepad but tthey took that out to make both versions "equal"

sorry ut that is extremely hard to believe, game devs would even make its game for the new system with "better" hardware and dumb it down.

this is the reason the wii u did not get a zelda game (other than the cube hd remake) is because the wii u was dead on arrival, they put zelda on hold while they were working on its new console then made zelda for it then ported it down to the wii u.

so i think you got them the wrong way round, if it wasnt the case then zelda would have been released ages ago for the wii u then ported at launch for the switch.

but nintendo didnt do this because it was a switch game ported down and also wanted to delay the wii u version so that people got the switch and the game insted.

pedro702 · Mar 27, 2017

Retroboy said:
well nintendo are not innovative then if they cant drum a basic game down to improve its frame rate, yet has the same issue on its "next gen" console.

when we can see game devs release massive games such as GTA and are able to make it work with minimal issues on the 360/PS3, yet nintendo cant get a basic cell shaded title to run smoothly when docked on its next gen console which is their 2nd console during the same geneartion.

how is this innovation, its imitation and sugar coating shite to make it seem better than it actually is.

im sure soon some fanboy will quote and try demand nintendo are the best, im to accept their flawed opinion while they disregard my opinion based on facts, not fanboysm, but they cant accept negative comments for something they love.

frame rate has nothing to do with inovative... lol every company has frrame rate issues basicaly and they sort of get fixed after afew patches, the thing is nintendo hasnt ever been to much into patches but yeah preety much all AAA games with their first version have issues and then get 2 or 3 patches to be well "gold".

Also what is your issue? i look at the switch like i look at a portable console, is there any portable console that has this much power? awnser NO, the switch is basicaly a fully portable wiiu slightly more powerfull, wich is great it was getting preety hard to tolerate the 3ds graphics, those graphics are dated as hell, if you take your tough off switch being a "homeconsole", the switch is a great portable, i mean playing a massive game like zelda anywhere is great, comparing it to psvita or 3ds this thing is amazing, if nintendo further down the line releases a more powerfull home console and leavues the switch as their portable i think we are all well served, heck if they from now on keep going with the switch line im happy, no more ahving games on the 3ds and on the wiiu we can get the same homeconsole game and portable game by buying just one cartrige, i only bought wiiu games becuase the off tv gameplay since i prefer to play those games in "portable mode" since i can leavue the tv for something else.

Spider_Man · Mar 27, 2017

pedro702 said:
frame rate has nothing to do with inovative... lol every company has frrame rate issues basicaly and they sort of get fixed after afew patches, the thing is nintendo hasnt ever been to much into patches but yeah preety much all AAA games with their first version have issues and then get 2 or 3 patches to be well "gold".

Also what is your issue? i look at the switch like i look at a portable console, is there any portable console that has this much power? awnser NO, the switch is basicaly a fully portable wiiu slightly more powerfull, wich is great it was getting preety hard to tolerate the 3ds graphics, those graphics are dated as hell, if you take your tough off switch being a "homeconsole", the switch is a great portable, i mean playing a massive game like zelda anywhere is great, comparing it to psvita or 3ds this thing is amazing, if nintendo further down the line releases a more powerfull home console and leavues the switch as their portable i think we are all well served, heck if they from now on keep going with the switch line im happy, no more ahving games on the 3ds and on the wiiu we can get the same homeconsole game and portable game by buying just one cartrige, i only bought wiiu games becuase the off tv gameplay since i prefer to play those games in "portable mode" since i can leavue the tv for something else.

i have always said if this was just a portable console it would be great, like the vita it has potential but vita lacked support.

for a home console (which it is also) it sucks arse.

nothing is innovative about it, like i said, whats innovative about not been able to sit further than 5 feet from the console in fear that the cheap hardware disconnects.

the console is just a cheap sack of shite and nintendo are trying to pass it off as something amazing, as a gamer it sounded good (portable) but for a home system it will fall behind like the wii u did.

thing is yes games are known to have frame issues, but come off it, zelda isnt something youd consider demanding or having shit loads on screen to process, if at launch its having problems then how the feck is it to ever run out more demanding.

and also, whats innovative about not allowing users to copy game save data and back it up, nope sorry we give you a shitty 32GB internal storage which our shitty OS takes aprox half of that, if you ever run out of space then sorry you have to delete your precious save data and if you decide to play your game again....... START FROM THE BEGINNING.

how the fuck can they claim to be innovative, when its so far behind in what it gives.

I am glad i never wasted my money on this shit console, (for the fans that will claim i am wrong because i dont own one, no faults or problems with this shit.... yes i do own one, it was a gift)

supergamer368 · Mar 27, 2017

(o_o)

pedro702 · Mar 27, 2017

Retroboy said:
i have always said if this was just a portable console it would be great, like the vita it has potential but vita lacked support.

for a home console (which it is also) it sucks arse.

nothing is innovative about it, like i said, whats innovative about not been able to sit further than 5 feet from the console in fear that the cheap hardware disconnects.

the console is just a cheap sack of shite and nintendo are trying to pass it off as something amazing, as a gamer it sounded good (portable) but for a home system it will fall behind like the wii u did.

thing is yes games are known to have frame issues, but come off it, zelda isnt something youd consider demanding or having shit loads on screen to process, if at launch its having problems then how the feck is it to ever run out more demanding.

and also, whats innovative about not allowing users to copy game save data and back it up, nope sorry we give you a shitty 32GB internal storage which our shitty OS takes aprox half of that, if you ever run out of space then sorry you have to delete your precious save data and if you decide to play your game again....... START FROM THE BEGINNING.

how the fuck can they claim to be innovative, when its so far behind in what it gives.

I am glad i never wasted my money on this shit console, (for the fans that will claim i am wrong because i dont own one, no faults or problems with this shit.... yes i do own one, it was a gift)

like i said your taking the switch has being a full fledged home console like the wiiu which isnt, the switch isnt a home console, sure nintendo is marketing it as an hybrid but anyone with some brains sees this is a portable console with a way to play games on the tv with more resolutin basicaly.

i will take and use my switch as a portable, heck i varely played on the tv i basicaly take it out of the dock and play it like i do with my 3ds.

Viri · Mar 28, 2017

Nintendo land 2 hype, this time with Amiibo support!

Futurdreamz · Mar 28, 2017

pedro702 said:
like i said your taking the switch has being a full fledged home console like the wiiu which isnt, the switch isnt a home console, sure nintendo is marketing it as an hybrid but anyone with some brains sees this is a portable console with a way to play games on the tv with more resolutin basicaly.

i will take and use my switch as a portable, heck i varely played on the tv i basicaly take it out of the dock and play it like i do with my 3ds.

It's more powerful then the Wii U. If you buy a a pro controller and hide the Switch behind a door you could basically forget that it can be portable. I think that's enough to consider it a console, just one that has the portability mod built in.

Captain_N · Mar 28, 2017

Taleweaver said:
Sorry, but this "no one" consists of quite a few people. And in fact, there's at least one more than decent game in the old metroid-style. It's called axiom verge. You should probably try it before making claims about what nobody or everybody wants, needs and/or makes.

I know all about that game. I was referring to actual metroid. Instead of hd remakes of older metroid games id like a new one.

slingblade1170 · Mar 28, 2017

I can tell by what people are saying they are speaking to the retroboy troll. Just ignore him you won't get a civilized argument. Someone from Nintendo screwed his wife or burnt it house down so he won't listen to reason.

grossaffe · Mar 28, 2017

slingblade1170 said:
I can tell by what people are saying they are speaking to the retroboy troll. Just ignore him you won't get a civilized argument. Someone from Nintendo screwed his wife or burnt it house down so he won't listen to reason.

My ignore list is so big nowadays that I don't hazard to guess who's involved in the arguments. Every now and then I'll hover the mouse down at the 'Show Ignored Content' just to see who it is.

Captain_N said:
I know all about that game. I was referring to actual metroid. Instead of hd remakes of older metroid games id like a new one.

Aren't those remasters and HD remakes usually done by a different team, so they don't really take up development time from someone who'd be making a new one anyways?

Spider_Man · Mar 28, 2017

pedro702 said:
like i said your taking the switch has being a full fledged home console like the wiiu which isnt, the switch isnt a home console, sure nintendo is marketing it as an hybrid but anyone with some brains sees this is a portable console with a way to play games on the tv with more resolutin basicaly.

i will take and use my switch as a portable, heck i varely played on the tv i basicaly take it out of the dock and play it like i do with my 3ds.

regardless what you may want to think or say, this is a home console, nintendo market it as a home console.

just nintendo hit a problem with the wii u and want to try ensure the switch does not fail, and save money by not releasing both a home and a portable console. merging the two saves them money and combines both market sales into one, thus increasing its sales figures.

so, yes it is in fact a home console and a portable console in one.

have nintendo released another home console to then class this as just a portable one? no.

Nintendo have stolen this concept off other tablets to give it more hype.

For a home console it sucks, its yet again another cheap machine that wont be able to provide the games third parties are pushing out these days.

for a portable console it is impressive, same view as the vita, its hardware is pretty good for a handheld, but like the vita, if it doesnt get the games (which nintendo proven they dont in the past) it will be an over priced paper weight.

i laugh how they claim to be innovative yet its features are flawed thanks to cheap hardware.

Spider_Man · Mar 28, 2017

slingblade1170 said:
I can tell by what people are saying they are speaking to the retroboy troll. Just ignore him you won't get a civilized argument. Someone from Nintendo screwed his wife or burnt it house down so he won't listen to reason.

doesnt matter to me if you want to add to an ignore list or call me a troll, like fans have been since day one, its like they stick their heads in the sand in denial.
end of the day the console is what it is, the fans can try claim its not and that nintendo havent just copied off other tablets to give its non-innovative console more hype.

time will prove everything ive said, its not like i said the exact same thing before the wii u launched, yet my views had the exact same response off nintendo fans.

hope you all enjoy your over prices last gen revamp to sit and play with old tech that doesnt work as intended (joycons/dock) to play the same old titles nintendo always release and it lack anything else thats new and a must have aaa title..... that you will have to wait when nintendo will be first yet again to rush out a new system because its hardware has always been shit, so you will eventually get ports of some of the best games that its rivals have had.

pedro702 · Mar 28, 2017

Retroboy said:
doesnt matter to me if you want to add to an ignore list or call me a troll, like fans have been since day one, its like they stick their heads in the sand in denial.
end of the day the console is what it is, the fans can try claim its not and that nintendo havent just copied off other tablets to give its non-innovative console more hype.

time will prove everything ive said, its not like i said the exact same thing before the wii u launched, yet my views had the exact same response off nintendo fans.

hope you all enjoy your over prices last gen revamp to sit and play with old tech that doesnt work as intended (joycons/dock) to play the same old titles nintendo always release and it lack anything else thats new and a must have aaa title..... that you will have to wait when nintendo will be first yet again to rush out a new system because its hardware has always been shit, so you will eventually get ports of some of the best games that its rivals have had.

if you count how manny wiiu games and 3ds games were made to be exclusive by nintendo themselves they are a crapton, if the switch gets as manny exclusive games as both home and portable consoles did it will be worth the money.

Also you do realize that every time nintendo had the most powerfull console except for the snes it sold porely?
besides the snes everytime nintendo wanted to to surpass sony playstation they lost and sold like crap like n64/GC and when they have a very underpowered one they actualy won with the wii lol.

no idea why you keep saying the joycons and the dock dont work, they work fine for me lol.

Spider_Man · Mar 28, 2017

pedro702 said:
if you count how manny wiiu games and 3ds games were made to be exclusive by nintendo themselves they are a crapton, if the switch gets as manny exclusive games as both home and portable consoles did it will be worth the money.

Also you do realize that every time nintendo had the most powerfull console except for the snes it sold porely?
besides the snes everytime nintendo wanted to to surpass sony playstation they lost and sold like crap like n64/GC and when they have a very underpowered one they actualy won with the wii lol.

no idea why you keep saying the joycons and the dock dont work, they work fine for me lol.

the 3ds - more so aimed for kids, the wii u lacked games but as stated, minus the usual nintendo titles whats left? nothing much hence the faulire.

there are reasons behind nintendo's failure and lets take the snes, kick ass machine would not consider it as a failure, then came the n64 and its failure started here, its ignorance to continue with old tech (carts) put devs off when it was cheaper and cd format offerred more.... yes the n64 had better graphics but it was costing more to produce, but the N64 still in my eyes had some great titles, the PS1 pissed all over it.

then came the cube, sony already had a good relationship with third parties and this carried over to the PS2, the cube had some great titles but again not that many, nintendo then promised better support but couldnt afford to take the risk so they revamped the cube.

the wii was marketed very well and did very well in sales, but its hardware was preventing it from getting the titles that third parties were pushing its games towards and it ended up littered with sports/party type games.

then came the wii u and sorry but nintendo's excuse its just a lie, it failed to get devs on board and again hardware, nintendo been cheap released a subpar last gen machine again with a bs tablet controller - it had minimal support and then it died pretty quickly.

we can see the same again, nintendo releasing another console thats not able to compete and knowing this nintendo add another bs gimmick to give it hype.

also to help prevent its sales looking bad, they decide to combine its home console market with its portable.... now to third parties and shareholders, this has to be a win win right?

but lets ignore the copied concept that it is, and look at it as what it is, a home console.... whats the chances of third parties releasing its AAA titles to it? very slim..... again.

nintendo can brag to the retards as much as they like on how they claim its sales are best ever (comparing to wii u), when the fact is, adding portable sales (3DS) to the console figure it falls short.

end of the day like any other nintendo console, it will prove it will be just another system with the usual nintendo titles.

i would bet both my testicles on this, it is fact third parties do not support nintendo as much as they do the other consoles, simply because nintendo refuse to spend money and make something that competes, they release cheap shit and over hype it.

most fans refuse to see this because theyre blinded.... i have a switch and i find its so called innovation a laughing stock, it shows how cheap and nasty and out dated the darn thing is, lucky for me it wasnt my money spent on it.

i will be willing to let anyone cut my happy sacks off if this console starts to get the great AAA third party titles the other systems get, thus giving gamers the option to buy said title rather than not have that option, because end of the day you buy a console to play games.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

pedro702 said:
no idea why you keep saying the joycons and the dock dont work, they work fine for me lol.

try use your joycon as a wireless controller and move further than 5 feet from your dock, in fact im sure if you moved to the exit of which ever room i bet it wont stay connected.

now take your ps3 or ps4, 360 or xbx1 what ever and see the difference...... its 2017 and nintendo "innovate" cant get wireless controllers to work properly and why.... poor design and shit hardware.

"lets put a square piece of sponge t fix t problem"..... hmmm ok nintendont, lets not recall them and improve its hardware that performs better.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

🗿

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads

Popular threads in this forum