Status
Not open for further replies.

Developer Playtonic Removes Jontron from Yooka-Laylee Cast

banner yuka.jpg

The developer behind Yooka-Laylee, a Kickstarter-funded spiritual successor to the beloved Banjo-Kazooie series plans to remove the Youtuber Jontron (Jon Jafari) from the game's cast of voice actors via a Day 1 update after his recent series controversial tweets regarding ethnic minorities in America. Jontron was always a big, vocal fan of the series and was invited to collaborate on the project back in February 2015. Many might say that he was pivotal in reviving the interest in Banjo-Kazooie through his content, both on Game Grumps and his own Youtube channel. Playtonic explained their position in an interview with Gameindustry.biz:
"We recently became aware of comments made by voice artist JonTron after development on Yooka-Laylee had been completed (...) JonTron is a talented video presenter who we were initially, two years ago, happy to include as a voice contributor in our game. However, in light of his recent personal viewpoints we have made the decision to remove JonTron's inclusion in the game via a forthcoming content update. We would like to make absolutely clear that we do not endorse or support JonTron's personal viewpoints and that, as an external fan contributor, he does not represent Playtonic in any capacity. Playtonic is a studio that celebrates diversity in all forms and strives to make games that everyone can enjoy. As such, we deeply regret any implied association that could make players feel anything but 100% comfortable in our game worlds, or distract from the incredible goodwill and love shown by our fans and Kickstarter backers."

This recent development in the Jontron controversy raises an important question regarding Free Speech. I can fully understand Playtonic's position - they're distancing themselves from Jontron in order to prevent any damage to their brand. On the other hand, one could argue that Jontron is free to voice his views on his own platform and shouldn't be penalised for them elsewhere.

Naturally this is a very controversial issue, so I'm eager to hear your thoughts on the matter. What's your opinion? Tell us in comments below!

Update: Jontron acknowledged the decision via his Twitter and although he finds it unfortunate, he understands it and wishes the developers a successful launch.

"Unfortunate to see Playtonic remove me from Yooka Laylee, but I understand their decision. I wish them the best with their launch!"

~https://www.twitter.com/JonTronShow/status/845038284967493638

:arrow: Source (Gameindustry.biz)
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,825
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,841
Country
Poland
So based on the majority of the people here due to the 1st amendment I can say whatever I like without any consequences?

So if I sat up here and said white people are shithead red neck crackers and homosexuals are an abomination and Muslims are all crazy suicide bombers and women are nothing more than my cum dumpster....yall cant do anything because i have my right to free speech which frees me from any consequences.
You can do that in the middle of the street and you shouldn't be harassed by the police in any way unless you are acting in a threatening manner. Your opinion represents you and you only. The government does not and should not have the authority to infringe upon your freedom of speech and expression as long as you're not violating the law. You have a right to say what's on your mind and others have the choice to not listen to you if they don't like what you're saying.
How about this example: Let's suppose some Internet user who's notorious for harassing people he doesn't like tries to submit a patch for a project I'm working on, and for exaggeration purposes, the patch is lined with rants about certain individuals he doesn't like. Would it be a "FREE SPEACH VIOLATION!!1!" if I rejected the patch because I didn't approve of his behavior, or would I be forced to accept it in order to satisfy the "anti-SJWs" (who, incidentally, become the very thing they hate)?
The difference here is that said opinion would be within the product of a larger body, the company. Jontron didn't make his comments within Yooka-Laylee against Playtonic's will, he did it privately. Playtonic is policing what he can and can't say on his own private platform that's unrelated to the product, which makes a huge difference. They are allowed to do so as Jon's right to freedom of speech does not invalidate their right to freedom of association, once again, that's not the topic. We know they can do it, unless it violates the contract they signed with Jon, the question posed is whether they should.
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
I don't mind that playtonic is removing it for brand sake; I just find it stupid for them to say:

"Playtonic is a studio that celebrates diversity in all forms and strives to make games that everyone can enjoy. "

For a company that celebrates diversity in all forms... They sure get upset when someone truly is diverse or different.

diversity means "showing a great deal of variety; very different." Which means they should be celebrating Jon Tron for having a different radical opinion...
Ah yes. The straight white American male showing hostile opinions towards other races adds so much variety to this bland [insert establishment here]
 

chartube12

Captain Chaz 86
Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
3,921
Trophies
1
XP
2,280
Country
United States
You can do that in the middle of the street and you shouldn't be harassed by the police in any way unless you are expressing your opinion in a threatening manner. Your opinion represents you and you only.
The difference here is that said opinion would be within the product of a larger body, the company. Jontron didn't make his comments within Yooka-Laylee against Playtonic's will, he did it privately. Playtonic is policing what he can and can't say on his own private platform that's unrelated to the product, which makes a huge difference. They are allowed to do so as Jon's right to freedom of speech does not invalidate their right to freedom of association, once again, that's not the topic. We know they can do it, unless it violates the contract they signed with Jon, the question posed is whether they should.

The company i work for would disagree with you and me. They somehow found a comment i made against hollywood and comic books on a comic book site. I am totally against changing well established characters race, gender, sex and sexuall choice for the lolz and p-correctiness. And they force me to remove my comments or else be fired...and i work in automotive plant. Completely unrelated to what i was posting
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

endoverend

AKA zooksman
Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
2,846
Trophies
0
Website
zooksman.com
XP
2,907
Country
United States
It seems to fall back onto the same Freedom of Speech problem.
I think it's a good thing. People should be allowed to say what you want. But then I would still want to be able call them a dick, and refuse to distribute their content.
I think Freedom of Speech shouldn't protect you from the consequences of what you have said, it should just allow you to say it.
^ This. Jontron's freedom of speech isn't being compromised here. You're allowed to say anything you want, but that doesn't mean you're guaranteed not to get metaphorically punched in the jaw for it.
 

Pluupy

_(:3」∠)_
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
1,945
Trophies
1
XP
2,265
Country
United States
People in this thread really don't get what free speech means.
Then stop playing smug and explain it if you understand what it means. Just standing on the side and saying they don't understand free speech contributes nothing to the thread.
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
^ This. Jontron's freedom of speech isn't being compromised here. You're allowed to say anything you want, but that doesn't mean you're guaranteed not to get metaphorically punched in the jaw for it.
On top of that it's not a government organization "punishing" him, which is the only thing the First Amendment protects against
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,825
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,841
Country
Poland
The company i work for would disagree with you and me. They somehow found a comment i made against hollywood and comic books on a comic book site. I am totally against changing well established characters race, gender, sex and sexuall choice for the lolz and p-correctiness. And they force me to remove my comments or else be fired...and i work in automotive plant. Completely unrelated to what i was posting
If you have a clause in your contract that specifies what you can and can't say on social media, they may be within their rights to do so. Besides, I'm not saying that they shouldn't - if you're contractually obligated to follow certain rules, you should. That being said, it works both ways - if the contract had no such clause, they had no leverage. Freedom of association is just as important as freedom of speech and expression, however we cannot forget about contractual obligations.
 

Sonic Angel Knight

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 27, 2016
Messages
14,399
Trophies
1
Location
New York
XP
12,933
Country
United States
The part about FE: Fates is really something alright, I never thought people would actually care about touching 2d characters with a stylus or think it is somehow creepy ... oh wait, pokemon anyone?
My arguement wasn't defending the content it was defending the decision to make it japanese exclusive and call it censorship, rather than include it and have a option not to use it. The fact nothing replaced it shows it was unnecessary to begin with but is there in japanese game. I don't care what kind of content it is in the game, is incomplete without it.

Just like in call of duty games where there is "OFFENSIVE CONTENT" To the player, you have a option to skip it, spectate it or play it. In Fire Emblem fates, you have no choice, is just gone for the sake of censorship, which is why most of the projects to translate games exist by fans. I plan to make friends, is a goal i had since grade school that never had seem to been getting better, and losing someone cause they can't respect my view on censorship just shows how bad the nature of some people are. Is fine we can't agree on things but we have other stuff in common, why should that lead to not having a relationship? Just find friends who do the things you don't wanna do with me, that why people have so many in the first place.

Anyway is not about me, is about the jon tron person getting his voice removed from a video game cause of a public opinion that seem to be effecting various spontaneous decisions. So is this game delayed until new voice actor can be found and recorded? To be honest i hope he is alright. :mellow:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

endoverend

AKA zooksman
Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
2,846
Trophies
0
Website
zooksman.com
XP
2,907
Country
United States
I said it when the campaign was announced, long before the Jontron controversy, and I'll say it again - Yooka-Laylee seems like a total cashgrab to me. The developers are desperately clinging to their former glory and instead of making a brand-new, original game they're making a pretend sequel to a game they no longer have the rights to that's basically bordering on copyright infringement by replicating everything they can including the font and replacing the protagonists so they don't get sued. That's all they can do at this point because the flame of their creativity is long since dead. They're removing Jontron because he can damage the brand, and the brand is all they have left. Yooka-Laylee, like many other games of its kind, is an elaborate attempt to cash in on your nostalgia and squeeze the last bit of money out of your wallet. I know it because I fall for it too. Some companies do this well, like inExile, others fail miserably. This is not original content, this is desperation. It's C.P.R administered to a cold corpse of an IP.
I actually totally agree with this. As I've already expressed in an article, I think gamers are tired of being handed the same things regurgitated over and over in an endless stream of the same games we've seen for the past 20 years. This is possibly the most flagrant abuse of nostalgia in recent memory. If it's a good title in its own right, then good for it, but somehow I just don't see this being the case, especially considering the Kickstarter platform and how often it's abused for the sake of nostalgia.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,825
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,841
Country
Poland
Can you provide some reasoning as to why they shouldn't?

You've already established that they can, so under what circumstances can't they?
In terms of contractual obligation they wouldn't be able to shred the agreement if the contract does not have a specific social media clause or gag order - he did his job and deserves payment. Whether the content is included or not upon its completion is up to the developer - they're in charge of the product and it should reflect their vision.

More broadly, I don't think they should remove content based on a Twitter shitstorms, or any form of positive or negative reactions from the media, simply because it shows lack of the aforementioned creative vision. I think creators should stand by their product rather than alter it to appease the mob. They should release exactly what they intended to and hope that people will like it, any less than that amounts to pandering. Moreover, I don't think such judgements should be based on what people do outside of their place of employment. Just because it's legal doesn't mean that it sits well in my stomach. I work with plenty of people I don't agree with, but I wouldn't disavow them or seek to remove them based on how I feel. That's just a personal opinion.
 

Pluupy

_(:3」∠)_
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
1,945
Trophies
1
XP
2,265
Country
United States
Playtonic is within their rights to withdraw the content made by someone they disagree with. I disagree with them affiliating Yooka Laylee with their political agenda, but I am not saying they can't do it. It is just distasteful for them to do so.

The people who Kickstarted Yooka Laylee weren't crowdfunding the game so the company would use it to push political commentary.

So why remove JonTron from Yooka Laylee? Playtonic is a no-name game developer with no gravity to their ideas. They had to resort to Kickstarter because only common peoples who don't know any better will support them. Their only position of power in the world is Yooka Laylee, this popular game which piggyback-rides on the nostalgia of Banjo Kazooie. They are nothing.

This incident is nothing but a publicity stunt to garner attention for the game.

"Yes, we'll work with you for this game but your personal political stances better be in line ours." So much for being a company who claims to supports diverse ideas. Fuck those hypocrites.

My god the main villain of Yooka Laylee is, I shit you not it says this on their website, "Corporate Creep Capital B". Fucking wow. Way to show "the man", Playtonic! Clearly you are the only good guy company who doesn't assert their authority on the little guys.
 
Last edited by Pluupy,

TobiasAmaranth

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
456
Trophies
1
Age
38
Location
Texas
Website
werewolfdarkarts.com
XP
2,616
Country
United States
Humanity really should start learning how to block out extremist opinions. Metered discussion being the only acknowledged discussion rather than the crazy shitstorm dramafests we see online and now even on news sites, that would be a world I would enjoy living in. This current world, of everyone shouting without listening, is becoming extremely depressing to be a part of.

The earlier quote with Jon's comments indicates that it was a metered discussion, mostly emphasizing the strange hypocrisies, and not advocating any sort of extreme violence, just cautionary awareness of the strange social climate. But when we show balanced opinions, it's met with extremism, and we become drowned out. It's like, people have forgotten that the world isn't black and white, A and Z, etc.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,825
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,841
Country
Poland
Playtonic is within their rights to withdraw the content made by someone they disagree with. I disagree with them affiliating Yooka Laylee with their political agenda, but I am not saying they can't do it. It is just distasteful for them to do so.

The people who Kickstarted Yooka Laylee weren't crowdfunding the game so the company would use to push political commentary. It's a fucking cartoon video game.

So why remove JonTron from Yooka Laylee? Playtonic is a no-name game developer with no gravity to their ideas. They had to resort to Kickstarter because only common peoples who don't know any better will support them. Their only position of power in the world is Yooka Laylee, this popular game which piggyback-rides on the nostalgia of Banjo Kazooie. They are nothing.

This incident is nothing but a publicity stunt to garner attention for the game.

"Yes, we'll work on you for this game but your personal political stances better be in line ours." So much for being a company who claims to supports diverse ideas. Fuck those hypocrites.
This actually reminds me of Blizzard's approach towards Overwatch and their never-ending campaign of trying to make it the ultimate PC PoC LGBTQ+ SJW #RESTOFTHEALPHABET game of all time. It started with Tracer's butt, which for some reason was controversial, and even then I was upset that they altered the product because of a couple snowflakes. The moment they realised that they had the eyes of the SJW community on them, more alterations, or "lore", as they call it followed suit. "Hey guys, did you know that Tracer is actually a lesbian?", "Hey! Did you know that Symmetra has autism?", "Are we diverse yet?" - it's shameless and disgusting, it reeks of blacksploitation from the 80's. People don't realise that their constant outrage was turned into a revenue stream. I just enjoyed the game because it was a good shooter, I don't need all this. In fact, it's making me like it less
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Veho @ Veho: Gee, I wonder if the author is biased?