Gaming Zelda BOTW - Low-res textures?

  • Thread starter KingpinSlim
  • Start date
  • Views 74,804
  • Replies 584

Adrian DX

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
65
Trophies
1
XP
333
Country
Norway
So USB vs. NAND makes no difference when it comes to framerate?
I've not noticed anything wrong with the textures, but as others have mentioned, the framerate is absolutely horrendous in certain spots (Very noticably in Kakariko)
 

morrissey2k7

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
45
Trophies
0
XP
385
Country
United States
I don't know if the OP got a different copy than I did, because I think it looks even better than I was expecting it would (light years better than what we saw at E3, which seems to be the footage they keep using in the Wii U/Switch comparison vids). I have experienced some frame drops moving from one area to another, or when there's a lot of action going on onscreen, but nothing that too frustrating. I think the game looks gorgeous, and super impressive considering the Wii U's specs.
 

Soupy_Soup

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Messages
9
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
52
Country
Serbia, Republic of
Completely agree with op, looks terrible. I need to see pictures from people who say that their game looks good, I'd like to kknow if we just have different standards of "good". This is my experience so far: http://m.imgur.com/uSjISv5,TOa4XQP,0bP73Bh,OfQRUMt,IvLuDyE
Maybe the problem is that my game is installed to a usb drive? Should I try installing it to system memory? Also, people whose game looks good, please tell me where you got the files, maybe mine are corrupted or compressed or whatever, I don't know.
 

naddel81

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,549
Trophies
1
XP
3,792
Country
United States
The game looks gorgeous on my 4K 55" TV, the performance is excellent without any drop on fps so far :D

View attachment 79856

View attachment 79857
thats not really true. I measured FPS to be anything between 31 and 10!

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

mine has no problem with graphics quality but has notable framerate drop very often
we all have since we all play the SAME game!

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Completely agree with op, looks terrible. I need to see pictures from people who say that their game looks good, I'd like to kknow if we just have different standards of "good". This is my experience so far: http://m.imgur.com/uSjISv5,TOa4XQP,0bP73Bh,OfQRUMt,IvLuDyE
Maybe the problem is that my game is installed to a usb drive? Should I try installing it to system memory? Also, people whose game looks good, please tell me where you got the files, maybe mine are corrupted or compressed or whatever, I don't know.
you can try whatever you want. you won't get anything sharper than now from the Wii U version. and even the switch does not feature HD textures. so you have to live with it.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I don't know if the OP got a different copy than I did, because I think it looks even better than I was expecting it would (light years better than what we saw at E3, which seems to be the footage they keep using in the Wii U/Switch comparison vids). I have experienced some frame drops moving from one area to another, or when there's a lot of action going on onscreen, but nothing that too frustrating. I think the game looks gorgeous, and super impressive considering the Wii U's specs.
exactly what I have seen so far. graphics are OK for Wii U. world is huge. and framerate is playable, not super smooth. all in all it is a typical nintendo game from the technical POV.
 

Soupy_Soup

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Messages
9
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
52
Country
Serbia, Republic of
thats not really true. I measured FPS to be anything between 31 and 10!

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


we all have since we all play the SAME game!

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


you can try whatever you want. you won't get anything sharper than now from the Wii U version. and even the switch does not feature HD textures. so you have to live with it.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


exactly what I have seen so far. graphics are OK for Wii U. world is huge. and framerate is playable, not super smooth. all in all it is a typical nintendo game from the technical POV.
Typical? I don't know, I've never seen jaggies like this in a nintendo game, not since the n64. The textures I can live with, but what the hell is wrong with the anti-aliasing? Never looked like this in any gameplay videos
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

naddel81

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,549
Trophies
1
XP
3,792
Country
United States
Typical? I don't know, I've never seen jaggies like this in a nintendo game, not since the n64. The textures I can live with, but what the hell is wrong with the anti-aliasing? Never looked like this in any gameplay videos
you have never seen jaggies in an ninty game? I feel bad for either your eye-vision or your bad TVs you play on.
Ninty games have always had jaggies. look at the 3DS!
N64 was the first console to release 3D graphics in Nintendo games and therefore the first to NOT use any form of anti aliasing because it was too demanding back then for the hardware. and yes: they all had jaggies if you had a large/good TV and a good eye-vision!
mario64-anti-aliasing.png


If you cannot see jaggies here, it is because your cable blurs the shit out of the image:
B9a5brhIcAA2kdp.jpg


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B9a5brhIcAA2kdp.jpg:large
B9a5brhIcAA2kdp.jpg:large

B9a5brhIcAA2kdp.jpg:large
 
Last edited by naddel81,

SonicMC

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
344
Trophies
1
XP
1,134
Country
United States
Dear lord, you do realize that SSD has no effect because the usb on the WiiU is a ''massive'' bottleneck?




Well people complained like crazy about batman arkham something on WiiU how unplayable it is with the low fps. I played through it not even noticing anything. So Im rather skeptic :)


I will politely disagree that the ssd will have no effect. When loading large files of a game. I can see that a hdd will run as fast as an ssd. Throughput will be limited by both devices by the usb/wii u bottleneck. When loading small files is when the ssd should shine. Lower seek time gets the data faster. Which could make it show up faster in game.

I have an older 500gb HDD and my brother has an ssd. There is a difference on how fast the icons from the USB get loaded on the system menu.
It may be just cause my HDD is a bit older; and a newer HDD would have much better seek times. All I know is that I believe that it can make a difference and does make small difference for me vs my brother. I have no real idea on breath of the wild; but a small guess, since it is 13 gb including the update. I would guess that if small files are rerouted to the update and some are taken straight from the game files; that they may not be optimized for usb hdd loading which means the drive head has to keep switching where to get data from. If this is true; then a ssd could be helpful, especially for small files; regardless of how lousy the wii u throughput is; if seektime is slowing things down further, then seektime is more important than throughput.

interesting video:
 
Last edited by SonicMC,

fatsquirrel

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
2,648
Trophies
2
Age
35
XP
3,480
Country
I will politely disagree that the ssd will have no effect. When loading large files of a game. I can see that a hdd will run as fast as an ssd. Throughput will be limited by both devices by the usb/wii u bottleneck. When loading small files is when the ssd should shine. Lower seek time gets the data faster. Which could make it show up faster in game.

I have an older 500gb HDD and my brother has an ssd. There is a difference on how fast the icons from the USB get loaded on the system menu.
It may be just cause my HDD is a bit older; and a newer HDD would have much better seek times. All I know is that I believe that it can make a difference and does make small difference for me vs my brother. I have no real idea on breath of the wild; but a small guess, since it is 13 gb including the update. I would guess that if small files are rerouted to the update and some are taken straight from the game files; that they may not be optimized for usb hdd loading which means the drive head has to keep switching where to get data from. If this is true; then a ssd could be helpful, especially for small files; regardless of how lousy the wii u throughput is; if seektime is slowing things down further, then seektime is more important than throughput.

interesting video:


Odd video. Internal memory will almost always if not always be faster than the external device.
Also if you noticed theres basically no difference in speed between optical ssd hdd and internal memory on the video :/

It doesnt matter how much faster the hdd or sdd is because the usb on wiiu is slower than the standard USB2 which is already SHIT slow decades old interface.
In my opinion at least. Im not a technician though :)


Edit: theres really not many small files in the game directories :)
 
Last edited by fatsquirrel,
  • Like
Reactions: SonicMC

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
Botw looks fine to me. Been playing it on a 4K tv but stopped playing after i went to kakariko village since i'm gonna play it on my switch on Friday so i don't want to spoil 2 much for myself.
Kakariko village seems to have drops till 10 - 15 fps. Sometimes even lower.
Also for the people complaining that it has no AA ? Nintendo doesn't know what AA is since i've never seen them use proper AA.
Even Switch games as seen from gameplay vids don't use AA.
Botw looks fine to me on the Wii U just that the framedrops are horrible and make it unplayable at times.
 

nolimits59

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2008
Messages
701
Trophies
1
XP
2,064
Country
France
Botw looks fine to me. Been playing it on a 4K tv but stopped playing after i went to kakariko village since i'm gonna play it on my switch on Friday so i don't want to spoil 2 much for myself.
Kakariko village seems to have drops till 10 - 15 fps. Sometimes even lower.
Also for the people complaining that it has no AA ? Nintendo doesn't know what AA is since i've never seen them use proper AA.
Even Switch games as seen from gameplay vids don't use AA.
Botw looks fine to me on the Wii U just that the framedrops are horrible and make it unplayable at times.
And the plot twist: the game is 90% identical to the switch version, textures included.

But guys, believe me, that game is more playable than hyrule warriors on O3DS...

See that compare a guy did with the WiiU leak from yesterday comapred to switch version.
It's the SAME game x), just some shaders differs.

 

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
And the plot twist: the game is 90% identical to the switch version, textures included.

But guys, believe me, that game is more playable than hyrule warriors on O3DS...

See that compare a guy did with the WiiU leak from yesterday comapred to switch version.
It's the SAME game x), just some shaders differs.


Yeah true but i see a lot more jaggies in the Wii U version tho in the distance.
But if it's truly the same then fuck Nintendo because that's some false advertisment they did !
I hope that there's gonna be a big difference tho. We'll see on Friday
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: 455