Gaming Touchscreen only games now allowed?

DiscostewSM

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
5,484
Trophies
2
Location
Sacramento, California
Website
lazerlight.x10.mx
XP
5,482
Country
United States
the only things I could think of are the AAA games with the extreme graphics. but in this case cant they just reduce the amount of polygons and reduce the level of detail in portable mode and enable it?
There's still the CPU drop in portable mode (assuming that's what happens), which is responsible for much of the game logic.
 

grossaffe

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
3,007
Trophies
0
XP
2,799
Country
United States
You read. READ. You didn't actually play it so you have no right to be defending it.
I can comment on how opinions differ. Maybe the controls aren't great for me; I don't know yet. But the fact remains that there are quite a number of reviews out there that do state that the controls can take time to get used to but are great after you adjust to them. You see, there exist people whose opinions do not match your own. No one person is the embodiment of objectivity and thus such opinions and preferences fall under the umbrella of subjectivity. You not liking the controls does not make them objectively bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quantumcat
D

Deleted User

Guest
There's still the CPU drop in portable mode (assuming that's what happens), which is responsible for much of the game logic.
but that isnt a big issue nowdays (from what I understand?) cause when you buy a gaming rig you dont really care about CPU (just that it wont suck thats all the requirements) but you do care about GPU... maybe Im wrong? or consoles are diffrent? please correct me in that case...
 

grossaffe

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
3,007
Trophies
0
XP
2,799
Country
United States
a great game is one that has intuitive controls so you can enjoy your time solving puzzles/adventuring/ whatever instead of having to waste your time to understand the controls of.
So then are you agreeing that dual-analog shooters should not exist because it takes time to get used to them the first time you play them? Maybe we should have the "Grandma" test where every new game is put into the hands of a grandmother who's never played video games before and see if the controls are intuitive to her. Can't risk the experiment being thrown off by putting in an experienced gamer who's already gone through the growing pains of learning some control schemes.
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
I can comment on how opinions differ. Maybe the controls aren't great for me; I don't know yet. But the fact remains that there are quite a number of reviews out there that do state that the controls can take time to get used to but are great after you adjust to them. You see, there exist people whose opinions do not match your own. No one person is the embodiment of objectivity and thus such opinions and preferences fall under the umbrella of subjectivity. You not liking the controls does not make them objectively bad.
but think about how great this game would be if the controls would be more intuitive... think how much better would it be if you would just enjoy the fun of the game without having to get used to the damn controls. ppl use a joystick only as an extension of themselves, as something that translate their wishes to the game. if there would be a way to play a game without the controller ppl would use it. and as an extension, it should be as seemless as possible to give the feeling that youre really the character inside the game, not the stupid ass that cant get used to those stupid controls.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

So then are you agreeing that dual-analog shooters should not exist because it takes time to get used to them the first time you play them? Maybe we should have the "Grandma" test where every new game is put into the hands of a grandmother who's never played video games before and see if the controls are intuitive to her. Can't risk the experiment being thrown off by putting in an experienced gamer who's already gone through the growing pains of learning some control schemes.
I agree partially. because if the dual anolog controllers dont give the player any advantages then they would be better off not used in a game. they grant you the possibility that cant be achieved without them, thats why ppl use them... and BTW im not gonna spend time to "get used to" the dual anolog sticks to play shooters because Im good with mouse and keyboard, and spending time mastering something thats not needed is pretty stupid... (I use the controllers in some games, more in slow paced ones and non-first-person ones)
 

grossaffe

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
3,007
Trophies
0
XP
2,799
Country
United States
but think about how great this game would be if the controls would be more intuitive... think how much better would it be if you would just enjoy the fun of the game without having to get used to the damn controls. ppl use a joystick only as an extension of themselves, as something that translate their wishes to the game. if there would be a way to play a game without the controller ppl would use it. and as an extension, it should be as seemless as possible to give the feeling that youre really the character inside the game, not the stupid ass that cant get used to those stupid controls.
The controller becomes an extension of yourself through experience. It's how the brain works. You give it something new and it takes some time to figure out as it makes neural connections until the new thing has become another extension of the brain. You give Grandma a controller, she won't make heads or tails of it because she hasn't used one before. Over time, though, she will adjust.

Just because your brain hasn't already set the neuro pathways for a particular control scheme does not make that control scheme inferior. It very well can be a superior control scheme once you adjust to it (see again: the dual-analog shooter control; took time to get used to after playing games such as Goldeneye and Perfect Dark, but in the end it was a superior control scheme after the brain adjusted).

Pretty much every game you play on a controller was, at one point, unintuitive. As you played video games for a long time, you became familiar with controllers and control schemes. Just because you are now familiar with certain control schemes it does not make those control schemes superior; it just means you are already experienced with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quantumcat

V0ltr0n

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
484
Trophies
0
Age
39
XP
542
Country
United States
I see this as a double edged sword. Should touch only games exist? Sure. There's a good handful of touch only (or touch-centric) games out there. The scary question is: will nintendo take this idea and run with it, making the switch into a pay-to-win cheap ass mobile game ports console? Apart from instances where a mobile game could be deemed worthy of being on console, if nintendo opens the door for games like candy crush, farmville and the many shitty game of war type mobile games, it will not be a good move. I prefer touch as an option, not as a forced control scheme.

TL/DR: Mobile games are NOT what we mean when we say we want continued 3rd party support. DON'T FUCKIN DO IT NINTENDO!!!
 
D

Deleted User

Guest
The controller becomes an extension of yourself through experience. It's how the brain works. You give it something new and it takes some time to figure out as it makes neural connections until the new thing has become another extension of the brain. You give Grandma a controller, she won't make heads or tails of it because she hasn't used one before. Over time, though, she will adjust.

Just because your brain hasn't already set the neuro pathways for a particular control scheme does not make that control scheme inferior. It very well can be a superior control scheme once you adjust to it (see again: the dual-analog shooter control; took time to get used to after playing games such as Goldeneye and Perfect Dark, but in the end it was a superior control scheme after the brain adjusted).

Pretty much every game you play on a controller was, at one point, unintuitive. As you played video games for a long time, you became familiar with controllers and control schemes. Just because you are now familiar with certain control schemes it does not make those control schemes superior; it just means you are already experienced with them.
my grandma plays FPS so thats a bad example LOL
but anywho if the controls are BAD then it will take too much time to adjust to, which may make more ppl ragequite. when you start playing titanfall after the last game you played was CS some years ago, you dont need to adjust all your brain, you just jump right into the game. no need to get used to the controls. theres a reason why mosta FPSs use similar control scheme..
if you would have to choose a control scheme you're used to or a new one, you would choose the first one unless the new one will give you advantages. if it doesnt have any, then it IS inferior.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I see this as a double edged sword. Should touch only games exist? Sure. There's a good handful of touch only (or touch-centric) games out there. The scary question is: will nintendo take this idea and run with it, making the switch into a pay-to-win cheap ass mobile game ports console? Apart from instances where a mobile game could be deemed worthy of being on console, if nintendo opens the door for games like candy crush, farmville and the many shitty game of war type mobile games, it will not be a good move. I prefer touch as an option, not as a forced control scheme.

TL/DR: Mobile games are NOT what we mean when we say we want continued 3rd party support. DON'T FUCKIN DO IT NINTENDO!!!
cant see the connection between being cheep ass mobile device and having touch controls. there are plenty of games that are great that will benefit from touch, but there are plenty of platforms with lame games that dont have touch controls (go see the old-j2me phones)
 

sarkwalvein

There's hope for a Xenosaga port.
Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
8,506
Trophies
2
Age
41
Location
Niedersachsen
XP
11,221
Country
Germany
People like to complain without reasons.
Let the reasons come first (and sure they will come) and then complain.
Touch controls could be great for many type of games when used right, so wait for the PoS implementations before complaining.
There is still a 0.1% probability the touch games that will (ever?) be released are fucking great.
 

grossaffe

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 5, 2013
Messages
3,007
Trophies
0
XP
2,799
Country
United States
my grandma plays FPS so thats a bad example LOL
but anywho if the controls are BAD then it will take too much time to adjust to, which may make more ppl ragequite. when you start playing titanfall after the last game you played was CS some years ago, you dont need to adjust all your brain, you just jump right into the game. no need to get used to the controls. theres a reason why mosta FPSs use similar control scheme..
if you would have to choose a control scheme you're used to or a new one, you would choose the first one unless the new one will give you advantages. if it doesnt have any, then it IS inferior.
Well I'd already in a previous post specified an inexperienced grandma :/

Anyways, as for giving advantages, Star Fox Zero decouples your blaster fire from your flight allowing you to aim places other than straight-forward. And using the gyro for this allows you to use your fine motor skills for pinpoint precision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quantumcat

kumikochan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
3,753
Trophies
0
Age
36
Location
Tongeren
XP
3,311
Country
Belgium
It is confirmed that not all games will work in Tv mode.
Some games that use the touchscreen will only work in handheld mode and won't use Tv-mode.
1 game that is confirmed to not use Tv mode is Voez.
voez.jpg
 
Last edited by kumikochan,
  • Like
Reactions: jt_1258

Hanafuda

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
4,485
Trophies
2
XP
6,941
Country
United States
I hate the idea, some people want to use the switch as a home console only. I don't want to be forced to use it as a tablet.

Don't worry, it'll be like what George Carlin said about abortion.

("Have you noticed that most of the women who are against abortion are women you wouldn't want to fuck in the first place?")
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,321
Country
United Kingdom
That works OK when you have millions to choose from. Given the gameplay deserts of recent Nintendo consoles then any port in a storm and all that.
 

duffmmann

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
3,966
Trophies
2
XP
2,305
Country
United States
I wonder if they'll consider creating games for Portrait play only now. I had floated this idea a few months ago (along with a few other ideas) for a possible adapter to connect to a Joycon port:

479KfTD.jpg

The image I used was Mario Run, which obviously wouldn't even need a special controller. But if the right game came along for portrait mode that also was more intensive than just needing the touch screen to play, then I'd hope they'd consider such an attachment, especially since now we know that games don't have to be playable in docked mode if the gameplay calls for it.
 

jt_1258

Ella
Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
3,053
Trophies
2
Age
24
XP
4,869
Country
United States
I'm sure having some decent games from mobile only may attract some causal players which may help sales, there are quite a few games I hope get ported like Voez has. Idolm@ster Cinderella Girls: Starlight Stage and Mobius Final Fantasy, although mobius ff does have controller controls on pc so if those controls get brought over, which they should if it gets ported, then that should allow it to also be a tv mode game unlike Idolm@aster's. Both being some of the higher quality games on mobile in my opinion.

I wonder if they'll consider creating games for Portrait play only now. I had floated this idea a few months ago (along with a few other ideas) for a possible adapter to connect to a Joycon port:

479KfTD.jpg

The image I used was Mario Run, which obviously wouldn't even need a special controller. But if the right game came along for portrait mode that also was more intensive than just needing the touch screen to play, then I'd hope they'd consider such an attachment, especially since now we know that games don't have to be playable in docked mode if the gameplay calls for it.
Ehh, kinda bad looking but i'm sure it could work out with a better design maybe.

I can comment on how opinions differ. Maybe the controls aren't great for me; I don't know yet. But the fact remains that there are quite a number of reviews out there that do state that the controls can take time to get used to but are great after you adjust to them. You see, there exist people whose opinions do not match your own. No one person is the embodiment of objectivity and thus such opinions and preferences fall under the umbrella of subjectivity. You not liking the controls does not make them objectively bad.
I just wana take a moment to say that there are some people who like Superman 64 XD
 

jt_1258

Ella
Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2016
Messages
3,053
Trophies
2
Age
24
XP
4,869
Country
United States
Just a quick photoshop job meant to reflect the idea, not necessarily how the real aesthetic would work. I would have hoped that was clear lol.
Naa, I get the point, not too bad for a quick mock up but I think it could work if executed correctly. Not to bad of a quick job XD
 

KingVamp

Haaah-hahahaha!
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
13,485
Trophies
2
Location
Netherworld
XP
7,920
Country
United States
I figured that this (and TV only) could happen, I didn't know it would happen so soon.
If enough touchscreen only or at least optional touchscreen only controls games are made, you could even leave your Joy Cons at home.
I really doubt Pokemon wouldn't have Tv mode.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jt_1258

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: roms wont boot with wood r4menu