But that wouldn't make more sense if Nintendo is going to release updated 3DS hardware, instead of trying to fix already hacked ones?
the switch uses a nivea chip so if you hard mod it you could flash android on to it
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
they all ready did that before and it did not work with the new 3ds it was hacked like not long after it came out because they ran basically the same software as the old 3ds mostly with just more ram and a better arm 11
Last edited by hacksn5s4,
All current exploits are open-sourced and well explained aren't they?
Current practice, find bug ==> work on exploit ==> release exploit with docs when time feels right ==> wait for Ninty to respond.
This seems to be an effort to have it switch to industry norm for security bugs. i.e. find bug/issue; theorise possible exploit; detail issue to company for bounty, wait an alloted time then release bug/exploit to community.
Yeah, it would. But it's not like Nintendo has ever made sense. It seems like their objective is to "vita"lize the 3ds completely for what's left of their lifetime.
"Community", in this case, is a blanket term. I wasn't just referring to this site. I also wasn't referring to A9LH users.
Stop jumping into conclusions.
Nintendo has never cared about exploits in older firmwares. They won't do anything to "patch A9LH" because, right now, to install A9LH you need an entrypoint in an older firmware. And that's what they care about, preventing new entrypoints from being discovered, like the recent DSiware downgrade, in hopes that the next person who finds a new one reports it to them for money.
They want to make sure the newest firmware has everything patched and that new systems being sold right now are fine. I'd say 80% of the 3DS userbase (probably more than that, just a guess) updates their system regularly.
Nintendo has never cared about exploits in older firmwares. They won't do anything to "patch A9LH" because, right now, to install A9LH you need an entrypoint in an older firmware. And that's what they care about, preventing new entrypoints from being discovered, like the recent DSiware downgrade, in hopes that the next person who finds a new one reports it to them for money.
They want to make sure the newest firmware has everything patched and that new systems being sold right now are fine. I'd say 80% of the 3DS userbase (probably more than that, just a guess) updates their system regularly.
Last edited by Sizednochi,
D
Deleted User
Guest
Damn, If I was a hacker I would sell out in a heartbeat.
But maybe that's just me (doubt it)
Yeah but, if you read the legal, it's kinda pointless as they can just say no to paying anything out and still take all the work you've put into it.
"Nintendo reserves the right to modify the terms of this program at any time.
You have no obligation to provide Nintendo with the abovementioned security and vulnerability information. However, you agree that by submitting such information to Nintendo, even if the information is not eligible for a reward, you grant Nintendo a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, sublicenseable, fully-paid and royalty-free license under any and all intellectual property rights that you own or control to use, copy, modify, create derivative works based upon and otherwise exploit such information for any purpose."
Have you seen how the switch looks? Bro the 3ds has 2 screens, switch got 1. All 3ds games use the bottom screen for some purpose, and therefore the switch doesn't have the nessicerry hardware. Not to mention that its a hybrid, meant to be played on a TV too, with a controller. I mean, even when you remove it and play it mobile, the controller buttons slide onto the side of the console. Which = no 3ds compatibility due to the lack of a touch screen. And not to mention, even if it did, the buttons go on the sides of the console, making it much too awkward to play normally. In fact that "theory" only arose on the net when people saw the switch play cartridges in the release trailer. So did the n64. Don't see backward compatibility for NES on that
See the premise behind buying a system is to legally say I own it. No matter who manufactured the product, if I dropped $80 at a GameStop, I'm entitled to do whatever the fk I want with it, no ifs, ands, or buts. That's why hacking a system is always legal. It becomes illegal when you pirate software
D
Deleted User
Guest
>create patches
>revert patches in the hacking community because you know how it was done
>repeat
>???
>profit
>revert patches in the hacking community because you know how it was done
>repeat
>???
>profit
D
Deleted User
Guest
D
Deleted User
Guest
No, blackmailing is not the right word.....it isn't even close lmao. They aren't demanding
Incorrect. Purchasing a system means you are purchasing the right to use the system as the manufacturer intended. The EULA covers this, and when you hit "I agree", you are legally obligated to abide by the agreement. You don't own the system, the manufacturer does.
Similar threads
-
- Portal
-
- Portal
-
-
@
Sicklyboy:
@Xdqwerty, to answer your question, they're a fusion Brit-pop/J-pop/electronic band with a woman vocalist. Flamingo is hands down their best known song but they've got a ton of other really good songs+1 -
@
Sicklyboy:
For example, one of my other favorite songs from them, with some massive house music influence -+1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
