Did you actually read the guide? Since you are on 1.0.0-0, you need to do a cart update before you do anything else.
Yes, make sure you are on the latest version of Luma then update. Do not use nightlies.
Last edited by KunoichiZ,
Yes I read that but i am asking i need to do updation till 9.2 only right? and also can i use the legit trick to own Fieldrunners originally on hacked cfw and use it for dsiware downgrade to downgrade my other 3ds which is on 11.1
Yes, 9.2.0-20 is the ideal firmware version to be on. I haven't tried the "legit trick", but you really should just buy it. It's a $5 game.
Source 3DS = system with CFW
Target 3DS = system without CFW
You need to buy the game from the eShop on the source system.
Is it okay to update once you reach the "Move EmuNAND" part of Plailect's A9LH guide, since there is now an 11.2 update?
Also, I cannot seem to get out of the HBL menu.
Every time the 3DS starts it goes to there, and there is no Luma3DS option in the HBL menu.
Also, I cannot seem to get out of the HBL menu.
Every time the 3DS starts it goes to there, and there is no Luma3DS option in the HBL menu.
Last edited by Kotomine Kirei,
my system is N3DSLL 10.0.7-32J with arm9loaderhax + luma3ds , i have red gateway with blank microSD (fat32), i copied launcher.data (3.4.1 or 3.7.2) to microSD and complete https://gbatemp.net/threads/tutorial-using-luma3ds-with-gateway-on-v2-a9lh.431691/#gateway-logo , i inserted red gateway and hold button when turning on 3ds, black screen.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
- Messages
- 15,144
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Canberra, Australia
- Website
- boot9strap.com
- XP
- 11,094
- Country
It will be more complicated to downgrade your browser on its own, plus you are likely to break stuff. You may find something in the future just won't work and nobody helping you is going to think of asking you whether you downgraded your browser because that's such a weird thing to do.
So, with the new firmware that just came out I was reading up on if it was safe to update, and I saw several mentions to make sure you are using the latest Luma3DS Stable and not nightly.
Well, my Luma3DS even stable was out of date, so I updated to the latest stable version of 6.3.1.7, and now I am confused.
The old version of Plailect's guide I followed mentioned to enable the options "SysNAND is updated" and "Force A9LH detection". These options are no longer there, and there are new options that the version version of the guide does not mention:
https://github.com/Plailect/Guide/wiki/Installing-arm9loaderhax
It only mentions:
Are these other two options no longer needed? I just want to make sure I don't accidentally enable (or not enable) something that could cause this update to actually update my FIRM and get me stuck on a non-hackable 3DS.
I can tell by the names what most of these four options do (though I am not sure what the point of booting SysNANMD FIRM by holding R is) but nothing seems to indicate any sort of update protection, unless that is something hard-coded that you cannot disable? (Or is that what this last option, "Patch SVC/service/archive/ARM9 access" is?).
Basically, what options do I have to choose (or make sure NOT to choose) to safely update on Luma3DS 6.3.1?
Well, my Luma3DS even stable was out of date, so I updated to the latest stable version of 6.3.1.7, and now I am confused.
The old version of Plailect's guide I followed mentioned to enable the options "SysNAND is updated" and "Force A9LH detection". These options are no longer there, and there are new options that the version version of the guide does not mention:
https://github.com/Plailect/Guide/wiki/Installing-arm9loaderhax
It only mentions:
- "Autoboot SysNAND"
- "Use SysNAND FIRM if booting with R (A9LH)"
- "Show NAND or user string in System Settings"
- "Show GBA boot screen in patched AGB_FIRM"
Are these other two options no longer needed? I just want to make sure I don't accidentally enable (or not enable) something that could cause this update to actually update my FIRM and get me stuck on a non-hackable 3DS.
I can tell by the names what most of these four options do (though I am not sure what the point of booting SysNANMD FIRM by holding R is) but nothing seems to indicate any sort of update protection, unless that is something hard-coded that you cannot disable? (Or is that what this last option, "Patch SVC/service/archive/ARM9 access" is?).
Basically, what options do I have to choose (or make sure NOT to choose) to safely update on Luma3DS 6.3.1?
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
- Messages
- 15,144
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Canberra, Australia
- Website
- boot9strap.com
- XP
- 11,094
- Country
Non-dev Luma will not let you break your console by updating so don't worry :-) (maybe dev Luma stops you as well). Worst that can happen is maybe you get a black screen on boot which you could fix by deleting the config so you can reselect options.
Last edited by Quantumcat,
It's not bricking my console I am worried about (well, I guess that too now that you brought it up... but that's a different issue), I just wanted to know if the protection so I can install an official update without it disabling A9LH/overwriting FRIM is hard-coded and thus I can't accidentally disable it through any of these options. Because I want to install 11.1.0-35 update that was just released and I realized my Luma3DS was pretty out of date so I updated it, and there are different options now from what I had before.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
- Messages
- 15,144
- Trophies
- 0
- Location
- Canberra, Australia
- Website
- boot9strap.com
- XP
- 11,094
- Country
I have a O3DS on 11.2.0-35U with A9LH.
I have a N3DSXL on the same firmware, but no hax.
My question is, can I downgrade the XL without a hardmod. Or is that still being figured out?
If so, what steps would I need to take to make that happen?
Thanks in advance.
I have a N3DSXL on the same firmware, but no hax.
My question is, can I downgrade the XL without a hardmod. Or is that still being figured out?
If so, what steps would I need to take to make that happen?
Thanks in advance.
Similar threads
-
Psionic Roshambo
-
BakerMan
The snack that smiles back, Ballsack!
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
the vram is one advantage when it comes to AI but ends up being slower even with that and really AI is the only use case that needs more than 12gb vram right now -
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I think I watched a video where two games at 4K where eating just over 16GB of RAM and it's the one case where the 7900XT and XTX pulled ahead (minus RTX of course)
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
So my opinion is that they could age a bit better in the future, and maybe AMD will continue improving them via drivers like they tend to do. No guarantee there but they have done it in the past. Just a feeling I have.
-
-
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
they definitely will age better but i feel dlss might outweigh that since it looks about as good as native resolution and much less demanding+1
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
AMD could introduce something comparable to DLSS but nvidia's got a lot more experience with that
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
least amd 7xxx has tensor cores which the previous generations didn't so there is the potential for AI upscaling
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
-
-
-
@
BakerMan:
Have you ever been beaten by a wet spaghetti noodle by your girlfriend because she has a twin sister, and you got confused and fucked her dad?
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I had a girlfriend who had a twin sister and they would mess with me constantly.... Until one chipped a tooth then finally I could tell them apart.... Lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
They would have the same hair style the same clothes everything... Really messed with my head lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to maybe close the gap a bit with Nvidia. Plus it would kinda put Nvidia at a future disadvantage since Nvidia can't make X86/64 CPUs? Intel and AMD licensing issues... I wonder how much that has held back innovation.
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to...