That doesn't matter at all... the more randos these guys have "volunteering for testing" the more likely someone will leak it, and in the case of the one Plutoo's doing, having Nintendo remove it from the eShop. I'm sure these guys are capable of testing their own hax.
http://gbatemp.net/threads/davees-i...all-3000-go-models.414948/page-2#post-6403046
I never said I deserve anything? i just wanted to volunteer, no need to be rude for that.
An actually working version of the hax itself leaking isn't necessarily the only thing that could go wrong. If testers go blabbing about how X game can be used as an entrypoint then Nintendo can go and remove it from the eShop before the hax is even officially released.
Even if it weren't an eshop title, they could have a patch waiting for when the exploit does get released to the public because one person leaked it
Hmm, thats true. They once had released a "Stability" patch for ORAS, during the time of spider3dstools. It was released so that people who didnt have 9.5 couldn't go online on ORAS. Wish we had httpwn back then lol
That's inevitable to happen regardless of someone leaking the exploit or even talking about it (IE, browserhax). However, if the exploit had some sort authentication in place, Nintendo wouldn't be able to do anything if it were leaked unless the source was leaked as well.
