mmm whatcha smea-ayy, ohhRIP emunand. You had a good run. But updated sysnand is the new prom queen around here...
mmm whatcha smea-ayy, ohhRIP emunand. You had a good run. But updated sysnand is the new prom queen around here...
No.Thank you so far.
Is there a way to use the gateway card (i still have some .3ds files, sometimes it's more convinient) with a9lh+Sysnand on 11.0? I have followed Plailects guide to install a9lh and Luma.
There are users currently working on that, but there have been some issues, especially with the o3ds. It seems as for now we can only get TOSHIBA NANDs working. Check out the thread with GW and A9LH. Or just wait till Gateway releases it, but that will be anytime SoonTM.Thank you so far.
Is there a way to use the gateway card (i still have some .3ds files, sometimes it's more convinient) with a9lh+Sysnand on 11.0? I have followed Plailects guide to install a9lh and Luma.
surely this question has been asked before, but it's possible to launch HomebrewLauncher cia from an updated SysNAND? What are the difference from a updated HL vs a 9.2 HL?
Even in this case you are not totaly screwed with a9lh. You should be able to rebuild the NAND with XORPADS and much help, and if you have a 9.2 Emunand you can simply copy it to sysnand.
emuNAND is not safer than updated sysNAND. Switching from updated sysNAND to emuNAND is 100% waste of space and time.
If you dont believe me ask a dev.
Ryanrocks says that it depends on the SD card, some boot emuNAND faster than the 3DS can boot sysNANDBooting emuNAND from Luma3DS with A9LH take more time than booting sysNAND from Luma3DS with A9LH.
Is that right?
Maybe like a fraction of a second lol. If your SD card is faster than the 3ds nand chip, then maybe the emunand is faster. In the end it won't make a difference unless you're The Flash xDBooting emuNAND from Luma3DS with A9LH take more time than booting sysNAND from Luma3DS with A9LH.
Is that right?
I'm using Samsung EVO 48MB/sRyanrocks says that it depends on the SD card, some boot emuNAND faster than the 3DS can boot sysNAND
yes!I'm using Samsung EVO 48MB/s
So emuNAND boot time is depend on SD Card?
"H"omebrew "L"auncher haha, but, once I enter on it, did I have the same permission as if I were on 9.2?Use the homebrew launcher cia and the HBL boot.3dsx. I don't know what you mean with HL?
It saves you 1-2gb of your SD. There are other advantages I'm sure. :]
You'll need to set up a 9.2 EmuNAND until either GW's release comes with a A9LH.bin compatible with public A9LH implementations or the community-modified GWA9LH implementation reaches a stable state for all 3DSes.Thank you so far.
Is there a way to use the gateway card (i still have some .3ds files, sometimes it's more convinient) with a9lh+Sysnand on 11.0? I have followed Plailects guide to install a9lh and Luma.
Thank you so far.
Is there a way to use the gateway card (i still have some .3ds files, sometimes it's more convinient) with a9lh+Sysnand on 11.0? I have followed Plailects guide to install a9lh and Luma.
You'll need to set up a 9.2 EmuNAND until either GW's release comes with a A9LH.bin compatible with public A9LH implementations or the community-modified GWA9LH implementation reaches a stable state for all 3DSes.
Here's a guide I wrote about using GW+Luma under current A9LH: http://gbatemp.net/threads/guide-how-to-use-gw-luma3ds-a9lh.424117/
I didn't know that the problem with Samsung NANDs was fixed. If OP wants to that route, then it should work just fine.There's really no reason to use that workaround anymore. Just use liomajor's workaround for current A9LH setups, it's soooo much better.
Link: https://gbatemp.net/threads/the-status-of-gateway-and-a9lh.427889/page-16#post-6386005
I am now using my Gateway3DS just fine with an updated 11.0 sysNAND. Using the 3.7.1 Launcher.dat. I however use Luma3DS to update, because I at least know that has Firm0/Firm1 protection.
Honestly, I always thought that the boot time argument was pretty pointless. People here like to make it out that having to wait extra seconds to boot up their 3DS is the worst thing that could ever happen. If you simply keep your 3DS in sleep mode instead of turning it off every time you're done using it, then you rarely have to worry about a few "precious" seconds being taken from you when you do actually boot the system.The only reason people are suggesting updatedsysnand is because it's new. I guarantee that if emunand wasn't a thing and arm9loaderhax introduced emuNAND, everyone would say "use emunand" "better security and stability".
Either way, PERSONALLY I'm using Dual emuNAND plus updatedsysnand. Updated sysNAND is my main boot, emuNAND1 is my 9.2 NAND and emuNAND2 is a region changed (to JP region) emuNAND. Weirdly I removed both from my SD Card and my sysNAND boot is still the same 9 seconds. It's 9 seconds WITH both emuNANDs. People say having an emuNAND increases boot by 2-3 seconds.