no because NASA and the modified FBI rely on memchunkhax2, which was fixed in 10.4.On an untouched 3DS that has been updated to 10.4, is it still possible to do the browserhax long enough to get into homebrew launcher, then into the FBI/NASA thing to install legit CIAs?
Thanks. Will previous installed legit CIAs on 10.3 survive an update to 10.4?no because NASA and the modified FBI rely on memchunkhax2, which was fixed in 10.4.
they should since they're "legit CIAs" and show up without any CFWThanks. Will previous installed legit CIAs on 10.3 survive an update to 10.4?
this is a really late response (yesterday) but I don't think this is actually illegal since you're modifying files the system uses during normal use. it would be illegal to start deleting files outside of that though.well then i guess nintendo broke the law with the wii then by removing hacked save files
but there is always ways around stuff like that, i.e nintendo decide in 10.5 that they suddenly feel like making a file called boot.3dsx on the root of the SD.....if there happens to be a "corrupt version" already there well they can delete it, i think they could probably just get away with it as "SD maintenance to remove files that may cause issues during normal operation" while EULA's don't supersede law, being notified something will be deleted before they do it is probably skirting on the right side of the law even if it is dickishthey should since they're "legit CIAs" and show up without any CFW
this is a really late response (yesterday) but I don't think this is actually illegal since you're modifying files the system uses during normal use. it would be illegal to start deleting files outside of that though.
yes, everything still works unless you're using Gatewayok i have a o3ds on 10.3 emunand can i update the emunand to 10.4? does everything still work fine?
yes, everything still works unless you're using Gateway
no update yetDid they release an update to fix the multi-ROM menu, then? Last I heard, 10.4 broke it.
It's possible to update without wanting?
I say, i turn on my 3ds and left it in sleep mode, he will "auto-download" the 10.4?
The message to update will start to appear now? Because he didn't appears when i'm in sysNAND (9.2 to 10.3)
There is anyway to block any attempt or message to upgrade?
Thanks for the answer!The 3DS doesn't auto update, no. It will automatically download the updates, but it will then nag you once a day (or is it more often? I forget) to press A to begin the update, or B to do it later. If you're using the TubeHax DNS (or a proxy, or something else that blocks Nintendo update servers), then you should never get those messages.
Thanks for the answer!
Did you have any instruction to how i do this TubeHax thing ?
I used the search of the forum , but found a lot of topics and none of it seems to be a tutorial or something like this .
If you use your 3DS in another language, then you'll have to figure out what those buttons are called in that language, of course.
- On your 3DS, open the System Settings app, then go to Internet Settings and Connection Settings. From there, select your favorite Connection, tap the Change Settings button, and on the second page head over to the DNS section. Once there, select "No" for "Auto-obtain DNS", and under Detailed Setup, enter the following address : 107.211.140.065.
Got a n3ds 9.2 with gateway 10.3 emunand coldboot set up.
And a 2ds rxtools 9.2 emunand 10.3 coldboot set up.
From what i read Multirom Menü gets broke on Gateway and rxtools is fine to upgrade.
But what i did Not read is if coldbooting still normaly works when update to 10.4, can someone help me out?
but there is always ways around stuff like that, i.e nintendo decide in 10.5 that they suddenly feel like making a file called boot.3dsx on the root of the SD.....if there happens to be a "corrupt version" already there well they can delete it, i think they could probably just get away with it as "SD maintenance to remove files that may cause issues during normal operation" while EULA's don't supersede law, being notified something will be deleted before they do it is probably skirting on the right side of the law even if it is dickish
but its all silly anyway they would be better off just focusing on blocking actual exploits rather than doing dick moves that ultimately are sidestepped easily