so you want to hear that nintendo had the most superior system of gen "X" . . . and you also admit that nintendo systems are lacking in hardware
no idea where your getting that from, it means nothing to anything i said, i know when nintendo used to be on top form when it came to hardware, i mean they always used to aim to be better than sega and sony in the early days.
look we all know 3rd party support sucks for nintendo but when you have a system great enough to make 3rd party companies indirectly apologize for doubting it as a market one can expect more than just rehashed re-released games . . . but you seem mad that these software co.'s did not have confidence in the switch to begin with so what if the market is currently ports when a good selling port is good startup money for working on a system they deemed to shitty to sell on in the first place (therefore did not budget much money for) . . .
when have any third party apologised to nintendo for not supporting them, the reason they end support is simply that the system IS NOT great enough, it costs them more to port its new titles over to inferior hardware and in return brings in less sales, hence why the support ends and they then focus on the hardware that they know can handle what theyre currently working on and it brings them good sales return.
if i remember correctly zombiiu is a perfect example of a great game from a 3rd party that hopped on too early so it flopped with the system and only got "real" recognition when ubisoft stripped the game down and resold it on other platforms . . . i say that to say no co. wants to repeat (or make) mistakes like this
Zombi U i admit was a decent game, but i didnt like the Wii u pad control, it wasnt that it hopped on too early, its like (which you will see) a third party wanting to show support, but the system was DOA again due to its hardware, not the BS nintendo told its fans "OHH GAMERS DIDNT KNOW THE WII U WAS A NEW CONSOLE, THEY THOUGHT IT WAS A WII ADDON".
This game got its recognition as you say because it was then later ported to the other consoles...... now use this as the prime example to why third parties support these systems more than nintendo, brings in the sales for them.
I understand that companies dont want to make the same mistake again, but tell me one thing, how many times have nintendo relied more on a fancy gimmick to make its inferior hardware sell.
when was the last time nintendo released an actual system with hardware to even compete with its competition, consider this that the switch is in fact nintendo's next gen system and it cant even compete with current gen.
its hardware is inferior....... so please use common sense here, why are devs going to pay more to publish its next big AAA title for nintendo when theyve learned in the past that it doesnt bring in the sales, hence why then end support.
just like the WII U, devs are testing the waters, porting its older games over, DOOM is a bad example of the switch trying to run anything last gen, lets see how LA NIORE performs and compared to its cheaper counter part "HD REMASTER" on the PS4/XBX1 which is cheaper.
its safer to wait before investing in nintendo safer yet if you could make that startup money on the console (and get a gauge of the number of fans you have on said console at the same time) its all about the profit and as nintendo is a notoriously bad place to seek that they get ports first instead of high budget brand spanking new games . . . but money talks and the more these ports bring in the higher the chance of big budget new
its not safer to wait, again look how the lacking support did the wii u no favours, end of the game game support is crucial to a console, why do you think i have such beef when it comes to nintendo consoles, im pissed that it always lacks the option to buy these new titles for nintendo consoles.
When i have a bookshelf full of PS4/XBX1 games and i only have 1 switch game which i got bored of and completed within a few weeks of it launching, and say a new third party title comes out that i like and if its not a shit port or costs more...... can you guess which system i would buy it on..... the two systems that i have shit loads of games, some not even completed yet, or the system i have nothing to play that i havent completed.
now im sure you can see me point here, that you dont get that option when it comes to nintendo
also i like how you downplay the consoles hybrid portability . . . like lol dude i am sorry that the only time you get up is to take a shit . . . you should get some friends lol
I actually refer to the taking a shite point because its what some of the nintendo fans on here say as a way to say its ok to pay more for an old game, the type of game they slated the other systems for being littered with, fps, blood guts gore..... when really y'all just got moist when you found out its coming to nintendo.....
im like erm..... yea wow who cares, i already own the game, if i didnt i can get it for £10 (far cheaper than a shitty port).
so just to recap, i buy a console to play games, its not my problem that nintendo do not provide the platform that third parties can support with its current new titles, i dont buy a console to play old games i already own.
yup i fucking hate sony when they keep advertising discount sales on PS2/PS3 games, why the fuck would i pay you again to play what i already own.
but anyway back to the point, im pretty sure that nintendo are teaming up with nvidia as a means to test ride the idea, see if it runs well considering the very close similarities between its shield and the switch.
i can bet you any money if nintendo did then impliment this on the switch, when the fans all slate PS/XBX for having some last gen ports, yup again these fanboys will contradict because we know theyre all dying to get this feature, so how is it bad for PS/XBX third parties to do this, yet its A OK when its nintendo doing it.....
i love the logics, its like back in the day Nintendo have better graphics, now its i dont give a shit about graphics its about fun gameplay..... all the games they slated is now ok and still on the dont give a shit about graphics, im playing these old games while taking a shite....
hmmm, but im sure more folks will keep quoting me insisting their view is solid and my views which can be proven is not valid, ill then be told again in a quote by another member who thinks i should stop trying to get others to share my same view, yet that rule should apply to those who try quoting.....
but they wont, they want to think nintendo is the best thing since sliced bread...... that i used to agree on many years ago, and trust me when i say this, sit back button those pretty little lips up and watch the third parties drop out, and when my problem has always been not having the option to play said titles where as i have on other systems comes true, im sure theyll go back to slating these games and will be loving em next gen when it gets ported over.